Re: [PATCH 0/17][REVIEW] Backport candidates for stable-0.10

From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/17][REVIEW] Backport candidates for stable-0.10
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 18:36:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A109F76.60505@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A104522.1060309@redhat.com>

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> This is a set of patches from master that I think are candidates for the
>> stable-0.10 branch.   They're all KVM specific.
>>
>> I tried to be conservative and didn't include any ia64, PPC, or 
>> passthrough
>> fixes.  I don't know the state of those subsystems well enough to 
>> judge whether
>> the commits help or not.
>>
>> To detect set of candidates to consider, I used the following git 
>> command:
>>
>>  git log ^kvm-stable-start origin/master..kvm
>>
>>   
>
> 'git log origin/stable-0.10..origin/master' would have given you the 
> same results ("all commits in master not present in stable").

You need to exclude commits from qemu/master too.

git log ^qemu/master origin/stable-0.10..origin/master

Gives the same result as what I did.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> I commented on some patches; all the rest seem appropriate to me.  If 
> you (and other reviewers) agree, I'll apply these patches.  Thanks for 
> doing this.
>