From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Munehiro Ikeda <m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
jens.axboe@oracle.com, nauman@google.com, dpshah@google.com,
lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, mikew@google.com, fchecconi@gmail.com,
paolo.valente@unimore.it, ryov@valinux.co.jp,
fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com,
taka@valinux.co.jp, jmoyer@redhat.com, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com,
jbaron@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io-controller: implement per group request allocation limitation
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:38:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A77D76B.3090502@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A77964A.7040602@ds.jp.nec.com>
Munehiro Ikeda wrote:
...
>
> Consideration and Conclusion
> =============================
>
> From result(1), it is observed that it takes 1000~1200[ms] to rise P2
> bandwidth. In result(2), where both of g1 and g2 have
> nr_group_requests=100, the delay gets longer as 1800~2000[ms]. In
> addition to it, the average bandwidth becomes ~5% lower than result(1).
> This is supposed that P2 couldn't allocate enough requests.
> Then, result(3) shows that bandwidth of P2 can rise quickly (~300[ms])
> if nr_group_requests can be set per-cgroup. Result(4) shows that the
> delay can be shortened by setting g2 as RT class, however, the delay is
> still longer than result(3).
>
> I think it is confirmed that "per-cgroup nr_requests limitation is
> useful in a certain situation". Beyond that, the discussion topic is
> the benefit pointed out above is eligible for the complication of the
> implementation. IMHO, I don't think the implementation of per-cgroup
> request limitation is too complicated to accept. On the other hand I
> guess it suddenly gets complicated if we try to implement further more,
> especially hierarchical support. It is also true that I have a feeling
> that implementation without per-device limitation and hierarchical
> support is like "unfinished work".
>
> So, my opinion so far is that, per-cgroup nr_requests limitation should
> be merged only if hierarchical support is concluded "unnecessary" for
> it. If merging it tempts hierarchical support, it shouldn't be.
> How about your opinion, all?
Hi Munehiro-san,
Thanks for the great job. It seems Per-cgroup requests allocation limits
has its value in some cases. IMHO, for the time being, we can just drop
the hierarchical support for "Per-cgroup requests allocation limits", and
see whether it can work well.
>
> My considerations or verification method might be wrong. Please correct
> them if any. And if you have any other idea of scenario to verify the
> effect of per-cgroup nr_requests limitation, please let me know. I'll
> try it.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--
Regards
Gui Jianfeng
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Munehiro Ikeda <m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com>
Cc: dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, snitzer@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, dpshah@google.com,
jens.axboe@oracle.com, agk@redhat.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
paolo.valente@unimore.it, fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp,
mikew@google.com, jmoyer@redhat.com, nauman@google.com,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
righi.andrea@gmail.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, fchecconi@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, jbaron@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io-controller: implement per group request allocation limitation
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:38:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A77D76B.3090502@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A77964A.7040602@ds.jp.nec.com>
Munehiro Ikeda wrote:
...
>
> Consideration and Conclusion
> =============================
>
> From result(1), it is observed that it takes 1000~1200[ms] to rise P2
> bandwidth. In result(2), where both of g1 and g2 have
> nr_group_requests=100, the delay gets longer as 1800~2000[ms]. In
> addition to it, the average bandwidth becomes ~5% lower than result(1).
> This is supposed that P2 couldn't allocate enough requests.
> Then, result(3) shows that bandwidth of P2 can rise quickly (~300[ms])
> if nr_group_requests can be set per-cgroup. Result(4) shows that the
> delay can be shortened by setting g2 as RT class, however, the delay is
> still longer than result(3).
>
> I think it is confirmed that "per-cgroup nr_requests limitation is
> useful in a certain situation". Beyond that, the discussion topic is
> the benefit pointed out above is eligible for the complication of the
> implementation. IMHO, I don't think the implementation of per-cgroup
> request limitation is too complicated to accept. On the other hand I
> guess it suddenly gets complicated if we try to implement further more,
> especially hierarchical support. It is also true that I have a feeling
> that implementation without per-device limitation and hierarchical
> support is like "unfinished work".
>
> So, my opinion so far is that, per-cgroup nr_requests limitation should
> be merged only if hierarchical support is concluded "unnecessary" for
> it. If merging it tempts hierarchical support, it shouldn't be.
> How about your opinion, all?
Hi Munehiro-san,
Thanks for the great job. It seems Per-cgroup requests allocation limits
has its value in some cases. IMHO, for the time being, we can just drop
the hierarchical support for "Per-cgroup requests allocation limits", and
see whether it can work well.
>
> My considerations or verification method might be wrong. Please correct
> them if any. And if you have any other idea of scenario to verify the
> effect of per-cgroup nr_requests limitation, please let me know. I'll
> try it.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--
Regards
Gui Jianfeng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-04 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 191+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-02 20:01 [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V6 Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 01/25] io-controller: Documentation Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 02/25] io-controller: Core of the B-WF2Q+ scheduler Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 03/25] io-controller: bfq support of in-class preemption Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 04/25] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 05/25] io-controller: Charge for time slice based on average disk rate Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 06/25] io-controller: Modify cfq to make use of flat elevator fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 07/25] io-controller: core bfq scheduler changes for hierarchical setup Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 08/25] io-controller: cgroup related changes for hierarchical group support Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 09/25] io-controller: Common hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <1246564917-19603-10-git-send-email-vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-06 2:46 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-06 2:46 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-06 2:46 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-06 14:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-06 14:16 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20090706141650.GD8279-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-07 1:40 ` [PATCH] io-controller: Get rid of css id from io cgroup Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-07 1:40 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-08 14:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08 14:04 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <4A52A77E.8050203-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-08 14:04 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <4A51657B.7000008-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-06 14:16 ` [PATCH 09/25] io-controller: Common hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 10/25] io-controller: cfq changes to use " Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 11/25] io-controller: Export disk time used and nr sectors dipatched through cgroups Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08 2:16 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-08 2:16 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-08 14:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08 14:00 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <4A54018C.5090804-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-08 14:00 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <1246564917-19603-12-git-send-email-vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-08 2:16 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 12/25] io-controller: idle for sometime on sync queue before expiring it Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <1246564917-19603-1-git-send-email-vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 01/25] io-controller: Documentation Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 02/25] io-controller: Core of the B-WF2Q+ scheduler Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 03/25] io-controller: bfq support of in-class preemption Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 04/25] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 05/25] io-controller: Charge for time slice based on average disk rate Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 06/25] io-controller: Modify cfq to make use of flat elevator fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 07/25] io-controller: core bfq scheduler changes for hierarchical setup Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 08/25] io-controller: cgroup related changes for hierarchical group support Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 09/25] io-controller: Common hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 10/25] io-controller: cfq changes to use " Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 11/25] io-controller: Export disk time used and nr sectors dipatched through cgroups Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 12/25] io-controller: idle for sometime on sync queue before expiring it Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 13/25] io-controller: Wait for requests to complete from last queue before new queue is scheduled Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 14/25] io-controller: Separate out queue and data Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 15/25] io-conroller: Prepare elevator layer for single queue schedulers Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 16/25] io-controller: noop changes for hierarchical fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 17/25] io-controller: deadline " Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 18/25] io-controller: anticipatory " Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 19/25] blkio_cgroup patches from Ryo to track async bios Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 20/25] io-controller: map async requests to appropriate cgroup Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 21/25] io-controller: Per cgroup request descriptor support Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 22/25] io-controller: Per io group bdi congestion interface Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 23/25] io-controller: Support per cgroup per device weights and io class Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 24/25] io-controller: Debug hierarchical IO scheduling Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 25/25] io-controller: experimental debug patch for async queue wait before expiry Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08 3:56 ` [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V6 Balbir Singh
2009-07-10 1:56 ` [PATCH] io-controller: implement per group request allocation limitation Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-27 2:10 ` [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V6 Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 13/25] io-controller: Wait for requests to complete from last queue before new queue is scheduled Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:09 ` Nauman Rafique
2009-07-02 20:09 ` Nauman Rafique
[not found] ` <e98e18940907021309u1f784b3at409b55ba46ed108c-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-02 20:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:17 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <1246564917-19603-14-git-send-email-vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-02 20:09 ` Nauman Rafique
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 14/25] io-controller: Separate out queue and data Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 15/25] io-conroller: Prepare elevator layer for single queue schedulers Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 16/25] io-controller: noop changes for hierarchical fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 17/25] io-controller: deadline " Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 18/25] io-controller: anticipatory " Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 19/25] blkio_cgroup patches from Ryo to track async bios Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 20/25] io-controller: map async requests to appropriate cgroup Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <1246564917-19603-21-git-send-email-vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-03 2:13 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-03 2:13 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-03 2:13 ` Gui Jianfeng
[not found] ` <4A7647DA.5050607-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 1:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-08-04 1:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-08-04 1:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 21/25] io-controller: Per cgroup request descriptor support Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08 3:27 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-08 3:27 ` Gui Jianfeng
[not found] ` <4A54121D.5090008-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-08 13:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08 13:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08 13:57 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <1246564917-19603-22-git-send-email-vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-08 3:27 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-21 5:37 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-21 5:37 ` Gui Jianfeng
[not found] ` <4A655434.5060404-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-21 5:55 ` Nauman Rafique
2009-07-21 5:55 ` Nauman Rafique
2009-07-21 5:55 ` Nauman Rafique
2009-07-21 14:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-21 14:01 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20090721140134.GB540-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-21 17:57 ` Nauman Rafique
2009-07-21 17:57 ` Nauman Rafique
2009-07-21 17:57 ` Nauman Rafique
[not found] ` <e98e18940907202255y5c7c546ei95d87e5a451ad0c2-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-21 14:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 22/25] io-controller: Per io group bdi congestion interface Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-17 0:16 ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-07-17 0:16 ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-07-17 13:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-17 13:52 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <4A5FC2CA.1040609-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-17 13:52 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <1246564917-19603-23-git-send-email-vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-17 0:16 ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 23/25] io-controller: Support per cgroup per device weights and io class Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 24/25] io-controller: Debug hierarchical IO scheduling Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 25/25] io-controller: experimental debug patch for async queue wait before expiry Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08 3:56 ` [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V6 Balbir Singh
2009-07-08 3:56 ` Balbir Singh
[not found] ` <20090708035621.GB3215-SINUvgVNF2CyUtPGxGje5AC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-08 13:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08 13:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08 13:41 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20090708134114.GA24048-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-08 14:39 ` Balbir Singh
2009-07-08 14:39 ` Balbir Singh
2009-07-08 14:39 ` Balbir Singh
[not found] ` <20090708143925.GE3215-SINUvgVNF2CyUtPGxGje5AC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-09 1:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-09 1:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-09 1:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-10 1:56 ` [PATCH] io-controller: implement per group request allocation limitation Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-10 1:56 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-13 16:03 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-13 16:03 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-13 21:08 ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-07-13 21:08 ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-07-14 7:45 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-14 7:45 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-04 2:00 ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-08-04 2:00 ` Munehiro Ikeda
[not found] ` <4A77964A.7040602-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 6:38 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-04 22:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-08-04 6:38 ` Gui Jianfeng [this message]
2009-08-04 6:38 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-04 22:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-08-04 22:37 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <4A5C377F.4040105-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 2:00 ` Munehiro Ikeda
[not found] ` <4A5BA238.3030902-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-14 7:45 ` Gui Jianfeng
[not found] ` <20090713160352.GA3714-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-13 21:08 ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-07-14 7:37 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-14 7:37 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-04 2:02 ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-08-04 2:02 ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-08-04 6:41 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-04 6:41 ` Gui Jianfeng
[not found] ` <4A7796D2.4030104-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 6:41 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-04 2:04 ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-08-04 2:04 ` Munehiro Ikeda
[not found] ` <4A779719.1070900-MDRzhb/z0dd8UrSeD/g0lQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 6:45 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-04 6:45 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-04 6:45 ` Gui Jianfeng
[not found] ` <4A569FC5.7090801-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-13 16:03 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-08-04 2:02 ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-08-04 2:04 ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-07-27 2:10 ` [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V6 Gui Jianfeng
[not found] ` <4A6D0C9A.3080600-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-27 12:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-27 12:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-27 12:55 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-28 3:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-28 3:27 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20090728032712.GC3620-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-28 3:36 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-28 3:36 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-28 3:36 ` Gui Jianfeng
[not found] ` <20090727125503.GA24449-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-28 3:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-28 11:36 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-29 9:07 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-28 11:36 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-29 9:07 ` Gui Jianfeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A77D76B.3090502@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=dpshah@google.com \
--cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
--cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=nauman@google.com \
--cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=ryov@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.