All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Send KOBJ_ADD event after dm resume ioctl.
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:42:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA34722.9030306@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268920694-10960-1-git-send-email-mbroz@redhat.com>

Milan Broz wrote:
> Block layer sends ADD uevent when new device is initialised.
> 
> But the device-mapper block devices are more complex,
> initialisation consists of allocating underlying device and
> loading mapping table.
> 
> Because from the userspace all block devices should behave
> the same, patch defines new flag indicating that ADD event
> should be suppressed in block layer.
> 
> If the flag is set, caller then take full responsibility
> for enabling and sending events later when device is ready
> to use.
> 

Please. DONT.

driver core sends out 'ADD' uevents whenever a device
is added (ie made visible) in /sys.
There is _no_ guarantee that a device is usable at this
point, hence there is is 'CHANGE' event which those device
afflicted by this sent out to signal to userspace the
device is now ready for use.

You are not alone here, S/390 DASD and qeth driver
behave the same.

And udev (and multipath :-) are pretty much aware of
the fact. And so should other userspace tools.

No need to fiddle around with events here. It'll
just serve to confuse userspace.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-19  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-18 13:58 [PATCH 1/3] Send KOBJ_ADD event after dm resume ioctl Milan Broz
2010-03-18 13:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add genhd flag requesting notification of partition changes only Milan Broz
2010-03-18 13:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] Do not send multiple REMOVE events for kobjects Milan Broz
2010-03-18 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] Send KOBJ_ADD event after dm resume ioctl Kay Sievers
2010-03-18 17:24   ` Alasdair G Kergon
2010-03-18 21:35   ` Milan Broz
2010-03-19  8:27     ` Kay Sievers
2010-03-19  9:06       ` Lars Ellenberg
2010-03-19  9:24         ` Kay Sievers
2010-03-19  9:49           ` Milan Broz
2010-03-19 10:16             ` Kay Sievers
2010-03-19 11:14               ` Milan Broz
2010-03-19 11:44                 ` Kay Sievers
2010-03-19 12:08                   ` Milan Broz
2010-03-19 12:14                     ` Kay Sievers
2010-03-19 11:50                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2010-03-19 12:00               ` Alasdair G Kergon
2010-03-19 12:12               ` Alasdair G Kergon
2010-03-19 12:16                 ` Kay Sievers
2010-03-19 13:17                   ` Peter Rajnoha
2010-03-19 13:24           ` Peter Rajnoha
2010-03-19 13:43             ` Kay Sievers
2010-03-19 13:47               ` Alasdair G Kergon
2010-03-19 13:58               ` David Zeuthen
2010-03-19 14:34                 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2010-03-19 14:59                   ` David Zeuthen
2010-03-19 15:24                     ` Alasdair G Kergon
2010-03-19 16:01                       ` David Zeuthen
2010-03-19 16:36                         ` Alasdair G Kergon
2010-03-22 10:11                         ` Milan Broz
2010-03-19 15:55                 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-03-19 16:08                   ` David Zeuthen
2010-03-19 14:08             ` Hannes Reinecke
2010-03-19 15:05               ` Peter Rajnoha
2010-03-19 15:14                 ` David Zeuthen
2010-03-19 15:51                   ` Peter Rajnoha
2010-03-19  9:10       ` Milan Broz
2010-03-19  9:22         ` Kay Sievers
2010-03-19  9:42 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2010-03-19 12:27   ` Alasdair G Kergon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BA34722.9030306@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=mbroz@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.