All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] clk: davinci: add a reset lookup table for psc0
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 11:01:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b985ed2-0db0-b4ad-8a9f-b8804e6d4db4@lechnology.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180321120807.18032-5-brgl@bgdev.pl>

On 03/21/2018 07:08 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> 
> In order to be able to use the reset framework in legacy boot mode as
> well, add the reset lookup table to the psc driver for da850 variant.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> ---
>   drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c | 8 ++++++++
>   drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c       | 1 +
>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c
> index ccc7eb17bf3a..395db4b2c0ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>    */
>   
>   #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/reset-controller.h>
>   #include <linux/clk.h>
>   #include <linux/clkdev.h>
>   #include <linux/init.h>
> @@ -66,8 +67,15 @@ LPSC_CLKDEV3(ecap_clkdev,	"fck",	"ecap.0",
>   				"fck",	"ecap.1",
>   				"fck",	"ecap.2");
>   
> +static struct reset_control_lookup da850_psc0_reset_lookup_table[] = {
> +	RESET_LOOKUP("davinci-rproc.0", NULL, 15),
> +};
> +
>   static int da850_psc0_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base)
>   {
> +	reset_controller_add_lookup("da850-psc0",
> +				    da850_psc0_reset_lookup_table,
> +				    ARRAY_SIZE(da850_psc0_reset_lookup_table));

Could there be a race condition here since you are adding the lookup *before*
you are adding the actual provider? It seems like reset_controller_add_lookup()
should be after davinci_psc_register_clocks().

>   	return davinci_psc_register_clocks(dev, da850_psc0_info, 16, base);
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c
> index 3b0e59dfbdd7..063df62381ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c
> @@ -425,6 +425,7 @@ __davinci_psc_register_clocks(struct device *dev,
>   
>   	psc->rcdev.ops = &davinci_psc_reset_ops;
>   	psc->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> +	psc->rcdev.dev = dev;
>   	psc->rcdev.of_node = dev->of_node;
>   	psc->rcdev.of_reset_n_cells = 1;
>   	psc->rcdev.of_xlate = davinci_psc_reset_of_xlate;
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: david@lechnology.com (David Lechner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] clk: davinci: add a reset lookup table for psc0
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 11:01:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b985ed2-0db0-b4ad-8a9f-b8804e6d4db4@lechnology.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180321120807.18032-5-brgl@bgdev.pl>

On 03/21/2018 07:08 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> 
> In order to be able to use the reset framework in legacy boot mode as
> well, add the reset lookup table to the psc driver for da850 variant.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> ---
>   drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c | 8 ++++++++
>   drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c       | 1 +
>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c
> index ccc7eb17bf3a..395db4b2c0ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>    */
>   
>   #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/reset-controller.h>
>   #include <linux/clk.h>
>   #include <linux/clkdev.h>
>   #include <linux/init.h>
> @@ -66,8 +67,15 @@ LPSC_CLKDEV3(ecap_clkdev,	"fck",	"ecap.0",
>   				"fck",	"ecap.1",
>   				"fck",	"ecap.2");
>   
> +static struct reset_control_lookup da850_psc0_reset_lookup_table[] = {
> +	RESET_LOOKUP("davinci-rproc.0", NULL, 15),
> +};
> +
>   static int da850_psc0_init(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base)
>   {
> +	reset_controller_add_lookup("da850-psc0",
> +				    da850_psc0_reset_lookup_table,
> +				    ARRAY_SIZE(da850_psc0_reset_lookup_table));

Could there be a race condition here since you are adding the lookup *before*
you are adding the actual provider? It seems like reset_controller_add_lookup()
should be after davinci_psc_register_clocks().

>   	return davinci_psc_register_clocks(dev, da850_psc0_info, 16, base);
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c
> index 3b0e59dfbdd7..063df62381ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c
> @@ -425,6 +425,7 @@ __davinci_psc_register_clocks(struct device *dev,
>   
>   	psc->rcdev.ops = &davinci_psc_reset_ops;
>   	psc->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> +	psc->rcdev.dev = dev;
>   	psc->rcdev.of_node = dev->of_node;
>   	psc->rcdev.of_reset_n_cells = 1;
>   	psc->rcdev.of_xlate = davinci_psc_reset_of_xlate;
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-21 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-21 12:07 [PATCH 0/8] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 12:07 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 12:08 ` [PATCH 1/8] reset: modify the way reset lookup works for board files Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 12:08   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 12:08 ` [PATCH 2/8] ARM: davinci: dts: make psc0 a reset provider Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 12:08   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 12:08 ` [PATCH 3/8] ARM: davinci: dts: add a reset control to the dsp node Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 12:08   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 14:04   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 14:04     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 16:07     ` David Lechner
2018-03-21 16:07       ` David Lechner
2018-03-21 12:08 ` [PATCH 4/8] clk: davinci: add a reset lookup table for psc0 Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 12:08   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 16:01   ` David Lechner [this message]
2018-03-21 16:01     ` David Lechner
2018-03-21 16:08     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 16:08       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 16:17       ` David Lechner
2018-03-21 16:17         ` David Lechner
2018-03-23  9:07         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-23  9:07           ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 12:08 ` [PATCH 5/8] remoteproc: da8xx: add the missing checke for clk_enable() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 12:08   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 16:21   ` David Lechner
2018-03-21 16:21     ` David Lechner
2018-03-21 12:08 ` [PATCH 6/8] remoteproc: da8xx: prepare and unprepare the clock where needed Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 12:08   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 12:08 ` [PATCH 7/8] remoteproc: da8xx: use the reset framework Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 12:08   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 12:08 ` [PATCH 8/8] clk: davinci: kill davinci_clk_reset_assert/deassert() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 12:08   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-03-21 16:23   ` David Lechner
2018-03-21 16:23     ` David Lechner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4b985ed2-0db0-b4ad-8a9f-b8804e6d4db4@lechnology.com \
    --to=david@lechnology.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.