From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: Ensure there are no stale ar->txqs entries.
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 10:19:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c1d2822-05cd-c0cb-7c57-a3f6c7ced709@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+BoTQnuLbVzuEVvf9+wOGhj7i3DV2LaMqGBfGhQHEgOSXei4g@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/05/2016 12:50 AM, Michal Kazior wrote:
> On 2 December 2016 at 01:24, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>> On 12/01/2016 02:52 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/19/2016 06:34 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 08/18/2016 11:59 PM, Michal Kazior wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 19 August 2016 at 03:26, <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was seeing kernel crashes due to accessing freed memory
>>>>>> while debugging a 9984 firmware that was crashing often.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch fixes the crashes. I am not certain if there
>>>>>> is a better way or not.
>>
>>
>> Michal, thanks for the help on IRC. I added this logic:
>>
>> static void ieee80211_drv_tx(struct ieee80211_local *local,
>> struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
>> struct ieee80211_sta *pubsta,
>> struct sk_buff *skb)
>> {
>> struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *) skb->data;
>> struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata = vif_to_sdata(vif);
>> struct ieee80211_tx_info *info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
>> struct ieee80211_tx_control control = {
>> .sta = pubsta,
>> };
>> struct ieee80211_txq *txq = NULL;
>> struct txq_info *txqi;
>> u8 ac;
>>
>> if ((info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_SEND_AFTER_DTIM) ||
>> (info->control.flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTRL_PS_RESPONSE))
>> goto tx_normal;
>>
>> if (!ieee80211_is_data(hdr->frame_control))
>> goto tx_normal;
>>
>> if (unlikely(!ieee80211_sdata_running(sdata))) {
>> WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>> goto delete_and_return;
>> }
>>
>> ...
>>
>> if (atomic_read(&sdata->txqs_len[ac]) >=
>> (local->hw.txq_ac_max_pending * 2)) {
>> /* Must be that something is not paying attention to
>> * max-pending, like pktgen, so just drop this frame.
>> */
>> delete_and_return:
>> ieee80211_free_txskb(&local->hw, skb);
>> return;
>> }
>>
>>
>> But, I still see the txq entries on the ar->txqs list in the
>> ath10k_mac_txq_init
>> after firmware crash in my test case. Is this the test you were suggesting?
>
> Yes.
>
> Now that I think about it mac80211 doesn't call anything in driver
> during hw_restart that would unref txqs. This means you'll have them
> still linked when add_interface/sta_state is called, no?
>
> This means that either:
> (a) txq (re-)init should be smarter in ath10k
> (b) txqs should be purged during hw_restart in ath10k
I posted a patch that does (a) last Friday:
"ath10k: work-around for stale txq in ar->txqs"
I realized it will not apply upstream because it is also patching the previous
work-around I had in the patch that originated this email thread.
With these patches and the iterate hack to mac80211, then I no longer
see crashes in my test case that previously crashed very readily.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: Ensure there are no stale ar->txqs entries.
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 10:19:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c1d2822-05cd-c0cb-7c57-a3f6c7ced709@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+BoTQnuLbVzuEVvf9+wOGhj7i3DV2LaMqGBfGhQHEgOSXei4g@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/05/2016 12:50 AM, Michal Kazior wrote:
> On 2 December 2016 at 01:24, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>> On 12/01/2016 02:52 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/19/2016 06:34 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 08/18/2016 11:59 PM, Michal Kazior wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 19 August 2016 at 03:26, <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was seeing kernel crashes due to accessing freed memory
>>>>>> while debugging a 9984 firmware that was crashing often.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch fixes the crashes. I am not certain if there
>>>>>> is a better way or not.
>>
>>
>> Michal, thanks for the help on IRC. I added this logic:
>>
>> static void ieee80211_drv_tx(struct ieee80211_local *local,
>> struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
>> struct ieee80211_sta *pubsta,
>> struct sk_buff *skb)
>> {
>> struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *) skb->data;
>> struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata = vif_to_sdata(vif);
>> struct ieee80211_tx_info *info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
>> struct ieee80211_tx_control control = {
>> .sta = pubsta,
>> };
>> struct ieee80211_txq *txq = NULL;
>> struct txq_info *txqi;
>> u8 ac;
>>
>> if ((info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_SEND_AFTER_DTIM) ||
>> (info->control.flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTRL_PS_RESPONSE))
>> goto tx_normal;
>>
>> if (!ieee80211_is_data(hdr->frame_control))
>> goto tx_normal;
>>
>> if (unlikely(!ieee80211_sdata_running(sdata))) {
>> WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>> goto delete_and_return;
>> }
>>
>> ...
>>
>> if (atomic_read(&sdata->txqs_len[ac]) >=
>> (local->hw.txq_ac_max_pending * 2)) {
>> /* Must be that something is not paying attention to
>> * max-pending, like pktgen, so just drop this frame.
>> */
>> delete_and_return:
>> ieee80211_free_txskb(&local->hw, skb);
>> return;
>> }
>>
>>
>> But, I still see the txq entries on the ar->txqs list in the
>> ath10k_mac_txq_init
>> after firmware crash in my test case. Is this the test you were suggesting?
>
> Yes.
>
> Now that I think about it mac80211 doesn't call anything in driver
> during hw_restart that would unref txqs. This means you'll have them
> still linked when add_interface/sta_state is called, no?
>
> This means that either:
> (a) txq (re-)init should be smarter in ath10k
> (b) txqs should be purged during hw_restart in ath10k
I posted a patch that does (a) last Friday:
"ath10k: work-around for stale txq in ar->txqs"
I realized it will not apply upstream because it is also patching the previous
work-around I had in the patch that originated this email thread.
With these patches and the iterate hack to mac80211, then I no longer
see crashes in my test case that previously crashed very readily.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-05 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-19 1:26 [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: Ensure there are no stale ar->txqs entries greearb
2016-08-19 1:26 ` greearb
2016-08-19 1:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] ath10k: Grab rcu_read_lock before the txqs spinlock greearb
2016-08-19 1:26 ` greearb
2016-08-19 3:01 ` Manoharan, Rajkumar
2016-08-19 3:01 ` Manoharan, Rajkumar
2016-08-19 3:28 ` Ben Greear
2016-08-19 3:28 ` Ben Greear
2016-09-09 13:36 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-09-09 13:36 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-09-09 14:47 ` Ben Greear
2016-09-09 14:47 ` Ben Greear
2016-09-12 6:41 ` Johannes Berg
2016-09-12 6:41 ` Johannes Berg
2016-09-12 16:37 ` Ben Greear
2016-09-12 16:37 ` Ben Greear
2016-08-19 1:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] ath10k: Improve logging message greearb
2016-08-19 1:26 ` greearb
2016-08-19 6:35 ` Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
2016-08-19 6:35 ` Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
2016-09-09 13:30 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-09-09 13:30 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-09-13 12:29 ` [3/3] " Kalle Valo
2016-09-13 12:29 ` Kalle Valo
2016-08-19 6:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: Ensure there are no stale ar->txqs entries Michal Kazior
2016-08-19 6:59 ` Michal Kazior
2016-08-19 13:34 ` Ben Greear
2016-08-19 13:34 ` Ben Greear
2016-12-01 22:52 ` Ben Greear
2016-12-01 22:52 ` Ben Greear
2016-12-02 0:24 ` Ben Greear
2016-12-02 0:24 ` Ben Greear
2016-12-05 8:50 ` Michal Kazior
2016-12-05 8:50 ` Michal Kazior
2016-12-05 18:19 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2016-12-05 18:19 ` Ben Greear
2016-09-09 17:25 ` Felix Fietkau
2016-09-09 17:25 ` Felix Fietkau
2016-09-09 17:46 ` Ben Greear
2016-09-09 17:46 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c1d2822-05cd-c0cb-7c57-a3f6c7ced709@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.