All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, jasowang@redhat.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] virtio-scsi: introduce multiqueue support
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:18:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5045E387.4030103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120904110905.GA9119@redhat.com>

Il 04/09/2012 13:09, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>> >     queuecommand on CPU #0         queuecommand #2 on CPU #1
>> >   --------------------------------------------------------------
>> >     atomic_inc_return(...) == 1
>> >                                    atomic_inc_return(...) == 2
>> >                                    virtscsi_queuecommand to queue #1
>> >     tgt->req_vq = queue #0
>> >     virtscsi_queuecommand to queue #0
>> > 
>> > then two requests are issued to different queues without a quiescent
>> > point in the middle.
> What happens then? Does this break correctness?

Yes, requests to the same target should be processed in FIFO order, or
you have things like a flush issued before the write it was supposed to
flush.  This is why I can only change the queue when there is no request
pending.

Paolo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] virtio-scsi: introduce multiqueue support
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:18:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5045E387.4030103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120904110905.GA9119@redhat.com>

Il 04/09/2012 13:09, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>> >     queuecommand on CPU #0         queuecommand #2 on CPU #1
>> >   --------------------------------------------------------------
>> >     atomic_inc_return(...) == 1
>> >                                    atomic_inc_return(...) == 2
>> >                                    virtscsi_queuecommand to queue #1
>> >     tgt->req_vq = queue #0
>> >     virtscsi_queuecommand to queue #0
>> > 
>> > then two requests are issued to different queues without a quiescent
>> > point in the middle.
> What happens then? Does this break correctness?

Yes, requests to the same target should be processed in FIFO order, or
you have things like a flush issued before the write it was supposed to
flush.  This is why I can only change the queue when there is no request
pending.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-04 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-28 11:54 [PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue virtio-scsi Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54 ` [PATCH 1/5] virtio-ring: move queue_index to vring_virtqueue Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-29  7:54   ` Jason Wang
2012-08-29  7:54     ` Jason Wang
2012-09-05 23:32   ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-05 23:32     ` Rusty Russell
2012-08-28 11:54 ` [PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce an API to set affinity for a virtqueue Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-05 23:32   ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-05 23:32     ` Rusty Russell
2012-08-28 11:54 ` [PATCH 3/5] virtio-scsi: allocate target pointers in a separate memory block Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 14:07   ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-28 14:07     ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-28 14:25     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 14:25       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54 ` [PATCH 4/5] virtio-scsi: pass struct virtio_scsi to virtqueue completion function Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54 ` [PATCH 5/5] virtio-scsi: introduce multiqueue support Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04  2:21   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-04  2:21     ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-04  6:46     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04  6:46       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04  8:46       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04  8:46         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 10:25         ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 10:25           ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 11:09           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 11:09             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 11:18             ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-09-04 11:18               ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 13:35               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 13:35                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 13:45                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 13:45                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 14:19                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 14:19                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 14:25                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 14:25                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 20:11       ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-04 20:11         ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-05  7:03         ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-05  7:03           ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 12:48   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 12:48     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 13:49     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 13:49       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 14:21       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 14:21         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 14:30         ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 14:30           ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 14:41           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 14:41             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 14:47   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 14:47     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 14:55     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 14:55       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 15:03       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 15:03         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-30  7:13 ` [PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue virtio-scsi Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-30  7:13   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-30 14:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-30 14:53   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-30 15:45   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-30 15:45     ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5045E387.4030103@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.