All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com, hutao@cn.fujitsu.com,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	asias@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, nab@linux-iscsi.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] virtio: add functions for piecewise addition of buffers
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:32:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50D07E6F.6040701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121218135938.GG26110@redhat.com>

Il 18/12/2012 14:59, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>>> Can't we track state internally to the virtqueue? Exposing it
>>> seems to buy us nothing since you can't call add_buf between
>>> start and end anyway.
>> 
>> I wanted to keep the state for these functions separate from the
>> rest. I don't think it makes much sense to move it to struct
>> virtqueue unless virtqueue_add_buf is converted to use the new API
>> (doesn't make much sense, could even be a tad slower).
> 
> Why would it be slower?

virtqueue_add_buf could be slower if it used the new API.  That's
because of the overhead of writing and reading from struct
virtqueue_buf, instead of using variables in registers.

>> On the other hand moving it there would eliminate the dependency
>> on virtio_ring.h.  Rusty, what do you think?
>> 
>>> And idea: in practice virtio scsi seems to always call
>>> sg_init_one, no? So how about we pass in void* or something and
>>> avoid using sg and count? This would make it useful for -net
>>> BTW.
>> 
>> It also passes the scatterlist from the LLD.  It calls sg_init_one
>> for the request/response headers.
> 
> Try adding a _single variant. You might see unrolling a loop gives
> more of a benefit than this whole optimization.

Makes sense, I'll try.  However, note that I *do* need the
infrastructure in this patch because virtio-scsi could never use a
hypothetical virtqueue_add_buf_single; requests always have at least 2
buffers for the headers.

However I could add virtqueue_add_sg_single and use it for those
headers.  The I/O buffer can keep using virtqueue_add_sg.

Paolo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	hutao@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] virtio: add functions for piecewise addition of buffers
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:32:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50D07E6F.6040701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121218135938.GG26110@redhat.com>

Il 18/12/2012 14:59, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>>> Can't we track state internally to the virtqueue? Exposing it
>>> seems to buy us nothing since you can't call add_buf between
>>> start and end anyway.
>> 
>> I wanted to keep the state for these functions separate from the
>> rest. I don't think it makes much sense to move it to struct
>> virtqueue unless virtqueue_add_buf is converted to use the new API
>> (doesn't make much sense, could even be a tad slower).
> 
> Why would it be slower?

virtqueue_add_buf could be slower if it used the new API.  That's
because of the overhead of writing and reading from struct
virtqueue_buf, instead of using variables in registers.

>> On the other hand moving it there would eliminate the dependency
>> on virtio_ring.h.  Rusty, what do you think?
>> 
>>> And idea: in practice virtio scsi seems to always call
>>> sg_init_one, no? So how about we pass in void* or something and
>>> avoid using sg and count? This would make it useful for -net
>>> BTW.
>> 
>> It also passes the scatterlist from the LLD.  It calls sg_init_one
>> for the request/response headers.
> 
> Try adding a _single variant. You might see unrolling a loop gives
> more of a benefit than this whole optimization.

Makes sense, I'll try.  However, note that I *do* need the
infrastructure in this patch because virtio-scsi could never use a
hypothetical virtqueue_add_buf_single; requests always have at least 2
buffers for the headers.

However I could add virtqueue_add_sg_single and use it for those
headers.  The I/O buffer can keep using virtqueue_add_sg.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-18 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-18 12:32 [PATCH v2 0/5] Multiqueue virtio-scsi, and API for piecewise buffer submission Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 12:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 12:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] virtio: add functions for piecewise addition of buffers Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 12:32   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 13:36   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-18 13:36     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-18 13:43     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 13:43       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 13:59       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-18 13:59         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-18 14:32         ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-12-18 14:32           ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 15:06           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-18 15:06             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-19 10:47   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-12-19 10:47   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-12-19 12:04     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-19 12:04       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-19 12:40       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-12-19 12:40         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-12-19 16:51       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-19 16:51         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-19 16:52         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-19 16:52           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-02  5:03   ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-02  5:03     ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-03  8:58     ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-03  8:58       ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-03  8:58       ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-06 23:32       ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-06 23:32       ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-06 23:32         ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-03  9:22     ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-03  9:22       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-07  0:02       ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-07  0:02         ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-07 14:27         ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-08  0:12           ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-08  0:12             ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-10  8:44             ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 12:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] virtio-scsi: use functions for piecewise composition " Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 12:32   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 13:37   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-18 13:37     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-18 13:35     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 13:35       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 12:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] virtio-scsi: redo allocation of target data Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 12:32   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 12:32 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] virtio-scsi: pass struct virtio_scsi to virtqueue completion function Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 12:32   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 12:32 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] virtio-scsi: introduce multiqueue support Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 13:57   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-18 13:57     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-18 14:08     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 14:08       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 15:03       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-18 15:03         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-18 15:51         ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 15:51           ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 16:02           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-18 16:02             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-25 12:41             ` Wanlong Gao
2012-12-25 12:41               ` Wanlong Gao
2012-12-19 11:27   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-12-19 11:27   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-12-18 12:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-18 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Multiqueue virtio-scsi, and API for piecewise buffer submission Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-18 13:42   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-24  6:44   ` Wanlong Gao
2012-12-24  6:44     ` Wanlong Gao
2012-12-18 22:18 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2012-12-19  8:52   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-19  8:52     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-19 11:32     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-19 11:32       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-12-18 22:18 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2013-01-15  9:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] virtio-scsi: split out request queue set affinity function Wanlong Gao
2013-01-15  9:48   ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-15  9:50   ` [PATCH 2/2] virtio-scsi: reset virtqueue affinity when doing cpu hotplug Wanlong Gao
2013-01-15  9:50     ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-16  3:31     ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-16  3:31       ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-16  3:55       ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-16  3:55         ` Wanlong Gao
2013-02-06 17:27         ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-02-06 17:27           ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50D07E6F.6040701@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=asias@redhat.com \
    --cc=gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=hutao@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.