Re: [PATCH V7 0/5] virtio-scsi multiqueue

From: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	mst@redhat.com, asias@redhat.com, venkateshs@google.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/5] virtio-scsi multiqueue
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 18:14:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <515FF581.5040403@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365237613.2787.1.camel@dabdike>

On 04/06/2013 04:40 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 16:55 +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>> On 03/28/2013 10:22 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>>> On 03/23/2013 07:28 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>>>> This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives
>>>> performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and
>>>> tcm_vhost backends).
>>>>
>>>> This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring rework patches, which
>>>> has already gone into virtio-next today.
>>>> We hope this can go into virtio-next together with the virtio ring
>>>> rework pathes.
>>>>
>>>> V7: respin to fix the patch apply error
>>>>
>>>> V6: rework "redo allocation of target data" (James)
>>>>     fix comments (Venkatesh)
>>>>     rebase to virtio-next
>>>>
>>>> V5: improving the grammar of 1/5 (Paolo)
>>>>     move the dropping of sg_elems to 'virtio-scsi: use virtqueue_add_sgs for command buffers'. (Asias)
>>>>
>>>> V4: rebase on virtio ring rework patches (rusty's pending-rebases branch)
>>>>
>>>> V3 and be found http://marc.info/?l=linux-virtualization&m=136067440717154&w=2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It would probably be easier to get it in via Rusty's tree
>>>> because of the prerequisites.  James, can we get your Acked-by?
>>>
>>> James, any thoughts for this version?
>>
>> Ping James....
> 
> Well, I haven't had time to look at anything other than the patch I
> commented on.  I'm happy with your fix, so you can add my acked by to
> that one.  Since it's going through the virtio tree, don't wait for me,
> put it in and I'll make you fix up anything I find later that I'm
> unhappy with.

Got it, thank you James.

Regards,
Wanlong Gao

> 
> James
> 
> 
> 