All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] xfstests: add regression test for kernel bz 60673
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:03:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5265422E.8000101@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382120790-31060-2-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com>

On 10/18/13 1:26 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> There was a problem with send trying to overwrite a file that wasn't actually
> the same.  This is a test to check this particular case where receive fails when
> it should succeed properly.  I tested this to verify it fails without my fix and
> passes with my fix.  Thanks,

2 things - 

Why does the selinux context break things?  That seems like a problem w/ send
if it can't work on a context-mounted fs?  (disabling it for now doesn't bother
me, but I'm surprised that it's required).

((I also wonder if I should get rid of that context in general and use it only
for tests which fail without it))

Rather than all the cd'ing around (to /) what if you just do something like:

SEND_TEST_DIR=$TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send

mkdir $SEND_TEST_DIR
touch $SEND_TEST_DIR/baz
touch $SEND_TEST_DIR/blah
mkdir $SEND_TEST_DIR/foo
touch $SEND_TEST_DIR/foo/bar

that seems a bit cleaner to me vs. the cd back and forth.

-Eric


> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
> ---
>  tests/btrfs/015     | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/btrfs/015.out |   2 +
>  tests/btrfs/group   |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/015
>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/015.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/015 b/tests/btrfs/015
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f35600f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/015
> @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# FS QA Test No. btrfs/015
> +#
> +# btrfs send ENOENT regression test, kernel bugzilla 60673
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +# Copyright (c) 2013 Fusion IO.  All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
> +# Inc.,  51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  USA
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +#
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +tmp_dir=send_temp_$seq
> +
> +status=1	# failure is the default!
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> +	$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol del $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap1 > /dev/null 2>&1
> +	$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol del $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap2 > /dev/null 2>&1
> +	$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol del $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send > /dev/null 2>&1
> +	rm -rf $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir
> +	rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +trap "_cleanup ; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs btrfs
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_require_scratch
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1
> +
> +#receive needs to be able to setxattrs, including the selinux context, if we use
> +#the normal nfs context thing it screws up our ability to set the
> +#security.selinux xattrs so we need to disable this for this test
> +export SELINUX_MOUNT_OPTIONS=""
> +
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +mkdir $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol create $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send \
> +	> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed subvol create"
> +
> +cd $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send
> +
> +mkdir test
> +touch test/baz
> +touch test/blah
> +mkdir test/foo
> +touch test/foo/bar
> +
> +# cd out in case any of this fails
> +cd /
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol snap -r $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send \
> +	$TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed snap1"
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -f $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send1.dump \
> +	$TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed send"
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive -f $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send1.dump $SCRATCH_MNT \
> +	>> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed receive"
> +
> +#recreate everything exactly the way it was exceptn in a different order so we
> +#get different inode numbers
> +cd $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send
> +rm -rf test
> +mkdir test
> +touch test/baz
> +mkdir test/foo
> +touch test/foo/bar
> +touch test/blah
> +cd /
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol snap -r $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send \
> +	$TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap2 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed snap2"
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -f $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send2.dump \
> +	$TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap2 -p $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap1 \
> +	>> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed second send"
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive -f $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send2.dump $SCRATCH_MNT \
> +	>> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed second receive"
> +
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +status=0 ; exit
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/015.out b/tests/btrfs/015.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..fee0fcf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/015.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 015
> +Silence is golden
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group
> index 07df957..a6f1820 100644
> --- a/tests/btrfs/group
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/group
> @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@
>  012 auto
>  013 auto quick
>  014 auto
> +015 auto quick
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] xfstests: add regression test for kernel bz 60673
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:03:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5265422E.8000101@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382120790-31060-2-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com>

On 10/18/13 1:26 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> There was a problem with send trying to overwrite a file that wasn't actually
> the same.  This is a test to check this particular case where receive fails when
> it should succeed properly.  I tested this to verify it fails without my fix and
> passes with my fix.  Thanks,

2 things - 

Why does the selinux context break things?  That seems like a problem w/ send
if it can't work on a context-mounted fs?  (disabling it for now doesn't bother
me, but I'm surprised that it's required).

((I also wonder if I should get rid of that context in general and use it only
for tests which fail without it))

Rather than all the cd'ing around (to /) what if you just do something like:

SEND_TEST_DIR=$TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send

mkdir $SEND_TEST_DIR
touch $SEND_TEST_DIR/baz
touch $SEND_TEST_DIR/blah
mkdir $SEND_TEST_DIR/foo
touch $SEND_TEST_DIR/foo/bar

that seems a bit cleaner to me vs. the cd back and forth.

-Eric


> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
> ---
>  tests/btrfs/015     | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/btrfs/015.out |   2 +
>  tests/btrfs/group   |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/015
>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/015.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/015 b/tests/btrfs/015
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f35600f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/015
> @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# FS QA Test No. btrfs/015
> +#
> +# btrfs send ENOENT regression test, kernel bugzilla 60673
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +# Copyright (c) 2013 Fusion IO.  All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
> +# Inc.,  51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  USA
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +#
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +tmp_dir=send_temp_$seq
> +
> +status=1	# failure is the default!
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> +	$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol del $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap1 > /dev/null 2>&1
> +	$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol del $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap2 > /dev/null 2>&1
> +	$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol del $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send > /dev/null 2>&1
> +	rm -rf $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir
> +	rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +trap "_cleanup ; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs btrfs
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_require_scratch
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1
> +
> +#receive needs to be able to setxattrs, including the selinux context, if we use
> +#the normal nfs context thing it screws up our ability to set the
> +#security.selinux xattrs so we need to disable this for this test
> +export SELINUX_MOUNT_OPTIONS=""
> +
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +mkdir $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol create $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send \
> +	> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed subvol create"
> +
> +cd $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send
> +
> +mkdir test
> +touch test/baz
> +touch test/blah
> +mkdir test/foo
> +touch test/foo/bar
> +
> +# cd out in case any of this fails
> +cd /
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol snap -r $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send \
> +	$TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed snap1"
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -f $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send1.dump \
> +	$TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed send"
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive -f $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send1.dump $SCRATCH_MNT \
> +	>> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed receive"
> +
> +#recreate everything exactly the way it was exceptn in a different order so we
> +#get different inode numbers
> +cd $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send
> +rm -rf test
> +mkdir test
> +touch test/baz
> +mkdir test/foo
> +touch test/foo/bar
> +touch test/blah
> +cd /
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol snap -r $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send \
> +	$TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap2 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed snap2"
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -f $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send2.dump \
> +	$TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap2 -p $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/snap1 \
> +	>> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed second send"
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive -f $TEST_DIR/$tmp_dir/send2.dump $SCRATCH_MNT \
> +	>> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "failed second receive"
> +
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +status=0 ; exit
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/015.out b/tests/btrfs/015.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..fee0fcf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/015.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 015
> +Silence is golden
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group
> index 07df957..a6f1820 100644
> --- a/tests/btrfs/group
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/group
> @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@
>  012 auto
>  013 auto quick
>  014 auto
> +015 auto quick
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-21 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-18 18:26 [PATCH 1/8] xfstests: fix btrfs/002 to not use the scratch dev pool Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26 ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfstests: add regression test for kernel bz 60673 Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26   ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:03   ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2013-10-21 15:03     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:09     ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:09       ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:14       ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:14         ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:21         ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:21           ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfstests: stat the dev we're removing to make sure its' really gone V2 Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26   ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:07   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:07     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:10     ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:10       ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfstests: btrfs/016: a hole punching send test Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26   ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:22   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:22     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-22 21:02   ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-22 21:02     ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfstests: generic/274 increase scratch fs size to 2g Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26   ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:29   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:29     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-22 20:25   ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-22 20:25     ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfstests: generic/311: add a few more test cases Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26   ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:37   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:37     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfstests: btrfs/017: add a regression test for snapshot creation Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26   ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-22 21:06   ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-22 21:06     ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfstests: btrfs/018: a regression test for subvolume rename Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26   ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:38   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:38     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-22 21:09   ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-22 21:09     ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-22 20:57 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfstests: fix btrfs/002 to not use the scratch dev pool Rich Johnston
2013-10-22 20:57   ` Rich Johnston

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5265422E.8000101@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=jbacik@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.