Re: [PATCHv5 2/2] arm: Get rid of meminfo

From: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	Courtney Cavin <courtney.cavin@sonymobile.com>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 2/2] arm: Get rid of meminfo
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 09:33:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53690EE6.2020909@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140501130849.C093DC409DA@trevor.secretlab.ca>

On 5/1/2014 6:08 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu,  3 Apr 2014 10:04:58 -0700, Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> memblock is now fully integrated into the kernel and is the prefered
>> method for tracking memory. Rather than reinvent the wheel with
>> meminfo, migrate to using memblock directly instead of meminfo as
>> an intermediate.
>>
>> Change-Id: I9d04e636f43bf939e13b4934dc23da0c076811d2
>> Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
>> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>> Tested-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
> 
> Tested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
> 
> Tiny nit-picking comment below, but this patch looks really good.
> What's the state on merging this?
> 

I put this into the patch system as 8025/1 a few weeks ago. I've been
busy/on vacation so I haven't had a chance to follow up since then.

Laura

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation