From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> To: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@gmail.com>, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: mturquette@linaro.org, shawn.guo@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, t.figa@samsung.com, l.majewski@samsung.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, heiko@sntech.de, thomas.ab@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] clk: exynos: use cpu-clock provider type to represent arm clock. Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 01:57:35 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5376A5EF.90104@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1400029876-5830-6-git-send-email-thomas.ab@samsung.com> Hi Thomas, On 14.05.2014 03:11, Thomas Abraham wrote: > From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> > > With the addition of the new Samsung specific cpu-clock type, the > arm clock can be represented as a cpu-clock type and the independent > clock blocks that made up the arm clock can be removed. > > Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 25 +++++++++---------------- > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 12 ++++++------ > include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c > index b4f9672..7e3bb16c 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c > @@ -471,7 +471,6 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos4210_mux_clks[] __initdata = { > MUX(0, "mout_fimd1", group1_p4210, E4210_SRC_LCD1, 0, 4), > MUX(0, "mout_mipi1", group1_p4210, E4210_SRC_LCD1, 12, 4), > MUX(CLK_SCLK_MPLL, "sclk_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_CPU, 8, 1), > - MUX(CLK_MOUT_CORE, "mout_core", mout_core_p4210, SRC_CPU, 16, 1), > MUX(CLK_SCLK_VPLL, "sclk_vpll", sclk_vpll_p4210, SRC_TOP0, 8, 1), > MUX(CLK_MOUT_FIMC0, "mout_fimc0", group1_p4210, SRC_CAM, 0, 4), > MUX(CLK_MOUT_FIMC1, "mout_fimc1", group1_p4210, SRC_CAM, 4, 4), > @@ -530,7 +529,6 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos4x12_mux_clks[] __initdata = { > MUX(0, "mout_jpeg", mout_jpeg_p, E4X12_SRC_CAM1, 8, 1), > MUX(CLK_SCLK_MPLL, "sclk_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_DMC, 12, 1), > MUX(CLK_SCLK_VPLL, "sclk_vpll", mout_vpll_p, SRC_TOP0, 8, 1), > - MUX(CLK_MOUT_CORE, "mout_core", mout_core_p4x12, SRC_CPU, 16, 1), > MUX(CLK_MOUT_FIMC0, "mout_fimc0", group1_p4x12, SRC_CAM, 0, 4), > MUX(CLK_MOUT_FIMC1, "mout_fimc1", group1_p4x12, SRC_CAM, 4, 4), > MUX(CLK_MOUT_FIMC2, "mout_fimc2", group1_p4x12, SRC_CAM, 8, 4), > @@ -572,8 +570,6 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos4x12_mux_clks[] __initdata = { > > /* list of divider clocks supported in all exynos4 soc's */ > static struct samsung_div_clock exynos4_div_clks[] __initdata = { > - DIV(0, "div_core", "mout_core", DIV_CPU0, 0, 3), > - DIV(0, "div_core2", "div_core", DIV_CPU0, 28, 3), Please don't remove these clocks, as they will be necessary to define proper hierarchy CMU_CPU clock output block. In particular, access to following clocks will be required: div_corem0 div_corem1 div_cores div_atb div_periph div_pclk_dbg div_hpm They might be implemented using normal dividers, but with CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY [1] and CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE flags. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/322977/focus=322978 This also means keeping mout_core clock defined, but with CLK_MUX_READ_ONLY flag it should be fine. > DIV(0, "div_fimc0", "mout_fimc0", DIV_CAM, 0, 4), > DIV(0, "div_fimc1", "mout_fimc1", DIV_CAM, 4, 4), > DIV(0, "div_fimc2", "mout_fimc2", DIV_CAM, 8, 4), > @@ -619,8 +615,8 @@ static struct samsung_div_clock exynos4_div_clks[] __initdata = { > DIV(0, "div_spi_pre2", "div_spi2", DIV_PERIL2, 8, 8), > DIV(0, "div_audio1", "mout_audio1", DIV_PERIL4, 0, 4), > DIV(0, "div_audio2", "mout_audio2", DIV_PERIL4, 16, 4), > - DIV(CLK_ARM_CLK, "arm_clk", "div_core2", DIV_CPU0, 28, 3), > - DIV(CLK_SCLK_APLL, "sclk_apll", "mout_apll", DIV_CPU0, 24, 3), > + DIV_F(CLK_SCLK_APLL, "sclk_apll", "mout_apll", DIV_CPU0, 24, 3, > + CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, 0), Do you need CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE here? AFAIK whenever rate is changed on APLL the clock core will recalculate rate of this clock. > DIV_F(0, "div_mipi_pre0", "div_mipi0", DIV_LCD0, 20, 4, > CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0), > DIV_F(0, "div_mmc_pre0", "div_mmc0", DIV_FSYS1, 8, 8, > @@ -1003,12 +999,6 @@ static struct samsung_gate_clock exynos4x12_gate_clks[] __initdata = { > 0), > }; > > -static struct samsung_clock_alias exynos4_aliases[] __initdata = { > - ALIAS(CLK_MOUT_CORE, NULL, "moutcore"), > - ALIAS(CLK_ARM_CLK, NULL, "armclk"), > - ALIAS(CLK_SCLK_APLL, NULL, "mout_apll"), > -}; > - > static struct samsung_clock_alias exynos4210_aliases[] __initdata = { > ALIAS(CLK_SCLK_MPLL, NULL, "mout_mpll"), > }; > @@ -1241,6 +1231,9 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, > ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4210_gate_clks)); > samsung_clk_register_alias(exynos4210_aliases, > ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4210_aliases)); > + exynos_register_arm_clock(CLK_ARM_CLK, mout_core_p4210, > + ARRAY_SIZE(mout_core_p4210), reg_base, np, NULL, > + &samsung_clk_lock); > } else { > samsung_clk_register_mux(exynos4x12_mux_clks, > ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_mux_clks)); > @@ -1250,11 +1243,11 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, > ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_gate_clks)); > samsung_clk_register_alias(exynos4x12_aliases, > ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_aliases)); > + exynos_register_arm_clock(CLK_ARM_CLK, mout_core_p4x12, > + ARRAY_SIZE(mout_core_p4x12), reg_base, np, NULL, > + &samsung_clk_lock); > } > > - samsung_clk_register_alias(exynos4_aliases, > - ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4_aliases)); > - > exynos4_clk_sleep_init(); > > pr_info("%s clocks: sclk_apll = %ld, sclk_mpll = %ld\n" > @@ -1262,7 +1255,7 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, > exynos4_soc == EXYNOS4210 ? "Exynos4210" : "Exynos4x12", > _get_rate("sclk_apll"), _get_rate("sclk_mpll"), > _get_rate("sclk_epll"), _get_rate("sclk_vpll"), > - _get_rate("arm_clk")); > + _get_rate("armclk")); I'd prefer name of this clock to be not changed to not cause conflicts with other patches. Similar comments apply to clk-exynos5250. Best regards, Tomasz
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v4 5/8] clk: exynos: use cpu-clock provider type to represent arm clock. Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 01:57:35 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5376A5EF.90104@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1400029876-5830-6-git-send-email-thomas.ab@samsung.com> Hi Thomas, On 14.05.2014 03:11, Thomas Abraham wrote: > From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> > > With the addition of the new Samsung specific cpu-clock type, the > arm clock can be represented as a cpu-clock type and the independent > clock blocks that made up the arm clock can be removed. > > Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 25 +++++++++---------------- > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 12 ++++++------ > include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c > index b4f9672..7e3bb16c 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c > @@ -471,7 +471,6 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos4210_mux_clks[] __initdata = { > MUX(0, "mout_fimd1", group1_p4210, E4210_SRC_LCD1, 0, 4), > MUX(0, "mout_mipi1", group1_p4210, E4210_SRC_LCD1, 12, 4), > MUX(CLK_SCLK_MPLL, "sclk_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_CPU, 8, 1), > - MUX(CLK_MOUT_CORE, "mout_core", mout_core_p4210, SRC_CPU, 16, 1), > MUX(CLK_SCLK_VPLL, "sclk_vpll", sclk_vpll_p4210, SRC_TOP0, 8, 1), > MUX(CLK_MOUT_FIMC0, "mout_fimc0", group1_p4210, SRC_CAM, 0, 4), > MUX(CLK_MOUT_FIMC1, "mout_fimc1", group1_p4210, SRC_CAM, 4, 4), > @@ -530,7 +529,6 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos4x12_mux_clks[] __initdata = { > MUX(0, "mout_jpeg", mout_jpeg_p, E4X12_SRC_CAM1, 8, 1), > MUX(CLK_SCLK_MPLL, "sclk_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_DMC, 12, 1), > MUX(CLK_SCLK_VPLL, "sclk_vpll", mout_vpll_p, SRC_TOP0, 8, 1), > - MUX(CLK_MOUT_CORE, "mout_core", mout_core_p4x12, SRC_CPU, 16, 1), > MUX(CLK_MOUT_FIMC0, "mout_fimc0", group1_p4x12, SRC_CAM, 0, 4), > MUX(CLK_MOUT_FIMC1, "mout_fimc1", group1_p4x12, SRC_CAM, 4, 4), > MUX(CLK_MOUT_FIMC2, "mout_fimc2", group1_p4x12, SRC_CAM, 8, 4), > @@ -572,8 +570,6 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos4x12_mux_clks[] __initdata = { > > /* list of divider clocks supported in all exynos4 soc's */ > static struct samsung_div_clock exynos4_div_clks[] __initdata = { > - DIV(0, "div_core", "mout_core", DIV_CPU0, 0, 3), > - DIV(0, "div_core2", "div_core", DIV_CPU0, 28, 3), Please don't remove these clocks, as they will be necessary to define proper hierarchy CMU_CPU clock output block. In particular, access to following clocks will be required: div_corem0 div_corem1 div_cores div_atb div_periph div_pclk_dbg div_hpm They might be implemented using normal dividers, but with CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY [1] and CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE flags. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/322977/focus=322978 This also means keeping mout_core clock defined, but with CLK_MUX_READ_ONLY flag it should be fine. > DIV(0, "div_fimc0", "mout_fimc0", DIV_CAM, 0, 4), > DIV(0, "div_fimc1", "mout_fimc1", DIV_CAM, 4, 4), > DIV(0, "div_fimc2", "mout_fimc2", DIV_CAM, 8, 4), > @@ -619,8 +615,8 @@ static struct samsung_div_clock exynos4_div_clks[] __initdata = { > DIV(0, "div_spi_pre2", "div_spi2", DIV_PERIL2, 8, 8), > DIV(0, "div_audio1", "mout_audio1", DIV_PERIL4, 0, 4), > DIV(0, "div_audio2", "mout_audio2", DIV_PERIL4, 16, 4), > - DIV(CLK_ARM_CLK, "arm_clk", "div_core2", DIV_CPU0, 28, 3), > - DIV(CLK_SCLK_APLL, "sclk_apll", "mout_apll", DIV_CPU0, 24, 3), > + DIV_F(CLK_SCLK_APLL, "sclk_apll", "mout_apll", DIV_CPU0, 24, 3, > + CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, 0), Do you need CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE here? AFAIK whenever rate is changed on APLL the clock core will recalculate rate of this clock. > DIV_F(0, "div_mipi_pre0", "div_mipi0", DIV_LCD0, 20, 4, > CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0), > DIV_F(0, "div_mmc_pre0", "div_mmc0", DIV_FSYS1, 8, 8, > @@ -1003,12 +999,6 @@ static struct samsung_gate_clock exynos4x12_gate_clks[] __initdata = { > 0), > }; > > -static struct samsung_clock_alias exynos4_aliases[] __initdata = { > - ALIAS(CLK_MOUT_CORE, NULL, "moutcore"), > - ALIAS(CLK_ARM_CLK, NULL, "armclk"), > - ALIAS(CLK_SCLK_APLL, NULL, "mout_apll"), > -}; > - > static struct samsung_clock_alias exynos4210_aliases[] __initdata = { > ALIAS(CLK_SCLK_MPLL, NULL, "mout_mpll"), > }; > @@ -1241,6 +1231,9 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, > ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4210_gate_clks)); > samsung_clk_register_alias(exynos4210_aliases, > ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4210_aliases)); > + exynos_register_arm_clock(CLK_ARM_CLK, mout_core_p4210, > + ARRAY_SIZE(mout_core_p4210), reg_base, np, NULL, > + &samsung_clk_lock); > } else { > samsung_clk_register_mux(exynos4x12_mux_clks, > ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_mux_clks)); > @@ -1250,11 +1243,11 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, > ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_gate_clks)); > samsung_clk_register_alias(exynos4x12_aliases, > ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_aliases)); > + exynos_register_arm_clock(CLK_ARM_CLK, mout_core_p4x12, > + ARRAY_SIZE(mout_core_p4x12), reg_base, np, NULL, > + &samsung_clk_lock); > } > > - samsung_clk_register_alias(exynos4_aliases, > - ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4_aliases)); > - > exynos4_clk_sleep_init(); > > pr_info("%s clocks: sclk_apll = %ld, sclk_mpll = %ld\n" > @@ -1262,7 +1255,7 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, > exynos4_soc == EXYNOS4210 ? "Exynos4210" : "Exynos4x12", > _get_rate("sclk_apll"), _get_rate("sclk_mpll"), > _get_rate("sclk_epll"), _get_rate("sclk_vpll"), > - _get_rate("arm_clk")); > + _get_rate("armclk")); I'd prefer name of this clock to be not changed to not cause conflicts with other patches. Similar comments apply to clk-exynos5250. Best regards, Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-16 23:57 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 123+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-05-14 1:11 [PATCH v4 0/8] cpufreq: use cpufreq-cpu0 driver for exynos based platforms Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 1:11 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 1:11 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: allow use of optional boost mode frequencies Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 1:11 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 3:46 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 3:46 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 6:17 ` Lukasz Majewski 2014-05-14 6:17 ` Lukasz Majewski 2014-05-14 6:20 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 6:20 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 13:43 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 13:43 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 13:50 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 13:50 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 14:18 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 14:18 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 14:20 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 14:20 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] clk: samsung: change scope of samsung clock lock to global Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 1:11 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 3:50 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 3:50 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 13:26 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 13:26 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-16 12:30 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-16 12:30 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-14 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 1:11 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-15 18:18 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-15 18:18 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-15 19:17 ` Heiko Stübner 2014-05-15 19:17 ` Heiko Stübner 2014-05-15 19:36 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-15 19:36 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-15 19:36 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-15 20:12 ` Heiko Stübner 2014-05-15 20:12 ` Heiko Stübner 2014-05-15 20:26 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-15 20:26 ` Doug Anderson 2014-05-16 4:55 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-16 4:55 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-16 17:17 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-16 17:17 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-23 14:41 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-23 14:41 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-23 14:50 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-23 14:50 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-14 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] Documentation: devicetree: add cpu clock configuration data binding for Exynos4/5 Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 1:11 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-16 23:24 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-16 23:24 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-17 0:00 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-17 0:00 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-26 6:05 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-26 6:05 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-26 11:02 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-26 11:02 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-14 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] clk: exynos: use cpu-clock provider type to represent arm clock Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 1:11 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 21:37 ` Mike Turquette 2014-05-14 21:37 ` Mike Turquette 2014-05-15 7:48 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-15 7:48 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-15 8:10 ` Lukasz Majewski 2014-05-15 8:10 ` Lukasz Majewski 2014-05-15 9:59 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-15 9:59 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-16 5:14 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-16 5:14 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-16 23:57 ` Tomasz Figa [this message] 2014-05-16 23:57 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-14 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] ARM: dts: Exynos: add cpu nodes, opp and cpu clock configuration data Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 1:11 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-16 23:16 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-16 23:16 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-14 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 1:11 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 12:50 ` Arnd Bergmann 2014-05-14 12:50 ` Arnd Bergmann 2014-05-14 13:05 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 13:05 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 13:11 ` Heiko Stübner 2014-05-14 13:11 ` Heiko Stübner 2014-05-14 13:14 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 13:14 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 13:14 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 13:18 ` Arnd Bergmann 2014-05-14 13:18 ` Arnd Bergmann 2014-05-14 13:45 ` Rob Herring 2014-05-14 13:45 ` Rob Herring 2014-05-14 13:45 ` Rob Herring 2014-05-14 14:33 ` Arnd Bergmann 2014-05-14 14:33 ` Arnd Bergmann 2014-07-08 5:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-08 5:15 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 14:03 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 14:03 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 14:03 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 14:09 ` Sudeep Holla 2014-05-14 14:09 ` Sudeep Holla 2014-05-14 14:09 ` Sudeep Holla 2014-05-14 14:09 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 14:09 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-17 0:04 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-17 0:04 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-14 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] cpufreq: exynos: remove all exynos specific cpufreq driver support Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 1:11 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 3:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 3:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 7:20 ` Lukasz Majewski 2014-05-14 7:20 ` Lukasz Majewski 2014-05-14 13:53 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 13:53 ` Thomas Abraham 2014-05-14 12:51 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] cpufreq: use cpufreq-cpu0 driver for exynos based platforms Arnd Bergmann 2014-05-14 12:51 ` Arnd Bergmann 2014-05-14 13:07 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 13:07 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-05-14 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann 2014-05-14 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann 2014-05-17 0:14 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-17 0:14 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-05-17 0:14 ` Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=5376A5EF.90104@gmail.com \ --to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \ --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=heiko@sntech.de \ --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \ --cc=l.majewski@samsung.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \ --cc=t.figa@samsung.com \ --cc=ta.omasab@gmail.com \ --cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \ --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.