From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> To: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@samsung.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] pinctrl: exynos: Add irq_chip instance for Exynos7 wakeup interrupts Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:46:03 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5429E12B.5020708@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1411967712-8321-4-git-send-email-a.kesavan@samsung.com> Hi Abhilash, Just two minor issues inline. I leave them up to Linus to decide. Linus, if you don't mind them, feel free to apply this patch with my Ack. On 29.09.2014 07:15, Abhilash Kesavan wrote: > Exynos7 uses different offsets for wakeup interrupt configuration registers. > So a new irq_chip instance for Exynos7 wakeup interrupts is added. The irq_chip > selection is now based on the wakeup interrupt controller compatible string. [snip] > @@ -469,12 +488,18 @@ static int exynos_eint_wkup_init(struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d) > struct samsung_pin_bank *bank; > struct exynos_weint_data *weint_data; > struct exynos_muxed_weint_data *muxed_data; > + struct exynos_irq_chip *exynos_wkup_irq_chip; Quite an awful name for a local variable. "irq_chip" alone would be enough. > unsigned int muxed_banks = 0; > unsigned int i; > int idx, irq; > > for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, np) { > - if (of_match_node(exynos_wkup_irq_ids, np)) { > + const struct of_device_id *match; > + > + match = of_match_node(exynos_wkup_irq_ids, np); > + if (match) { > + exynos_wkup_irq_chip = kmemdup(match->data, > + sizeof(struct exynos_irq_chip), GFP_KERNEL); sizeof(*exynos_wkup_irq_chip) (or irq_chip considering my comment above) could be used instead. Best regards, Tomasz
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v3 3/6] pinctrl: exynos: Add irq_chip instance for Exynos7 wakeup interrupts Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:46:03 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5429E12B.5020708@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1411967712-8321-4-git-send-email-a.kesavan@samsung.com> Hi Abhilash, Just two minor issues inline. I leave them up to Linus to decide. Linus, if you don't mind them, feel free to apply this patch with my Ack. On 29.09.2014 07:15, Abhilash Kesavan wrote: > Exynos7 uses different offsets for wakeup interrupt configuration registers. > So a new irq_chip instance for Exynos7 wakeup interrupts is added. The irq_chip > selection is now based on the wakeup interrupt controller compatible string. [snip] > @@ -469,12 +488,18 @@ static int exynos_eint_wkup_init(struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d) > struct samsung_pin_bank *bank; > struct exynos_weint_data *weint_data; > struct exynos_muxed_weint_data *muxed_data; > + struct exynos_irq_chip *exynos_wkup_irq_chip; Quite an awful name for a local variable. "irq_chip" alone would be enough. > unsigned int muxed_banks = 0; > unsigned int i; > int idx, irq; > > for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, np) { > - if (of_match_node(exynos_wkup_irq_ids, np)) { > + const struct of_device_id *match; > + > + match = of_match_node(exynos_wkup_irq_ids, np); > + if (match) { > + exynos_wkup_irq_chip = kmemdup(match->data, > + sizeof(struct exynos_irq_chip), GFP_KERNEL); sizeof(*exynos_wkup_irq_chip) (or irq_chip considering my comment above) could be used instead. Best regards, Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-29 22:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-09-29 5:15 [PATCH v3 0/6] Add initial support for pinctrl on Exynos7 Abhilash Kesavan 2014-09-29 5:15 ` Abhilash Kesavan 2014-09-29 5:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: exynos: Generalize the eint16_31 demux code Abhilash Kesavan 2014-09-29 5:15 ` Abhilash Kesavan 2014-09-29 5:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] pinctrl: exynos: Consolidate irq domain callbacks Abhilash Kesavan 2014-09-29 5:15 ` Abhilash Kesavan 2014-09-29 5:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] pinctrl: exynos: Add irq_chip instance for Exynos7 wakeup interrupts Abhilash Kesavan 2014-09-29 5:15 ` Abhilash Kesavan 2014-09-29 22:46 ` Tomasz Figa [this message] 2014-09-29 22:46 ` Tomasz Figa 2014-09-30 14:26 ` Abhilash Kesavan 2014-09-30 14:26 ` Abhilash Kesavan 2014-09-29 5:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] pinctrl: exynos: Add initial driver data for Exynos7 Abhilash Kesavan 2014-09-29 5:15 ` Abhilash Kesavan 2014-09-29 5:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] arm64: dts: Add initial pinctrl support to EXYNOS7 Abhilash Kesavan 2014-09-29 5:15 ` Abhilash Kesavan 2014-09-29 5:15 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] arm64: exynos: Enable pinctrl support for Exynos7 Abhilash Kesavan 2014-09-29 5:15 ` Abhilash Kesavan 2014-09-29 22:49 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] Add initial support for pinctrl on Exynos7 Tomasz Figa 2014-09-29 22:49 ` Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=5429E12B.5020708@gmail.com \ --to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \ --cc=a.kesavan@samsung.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=robh@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.