All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>, "Christopherson,,
	Sean" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Zhang, Cathy" <cathy.zhang@intel.com>,
	"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"jarkko@kernel.org" <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	"bp@suse.de" <bp@suse.de>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>, "Du, Fan" <fan.du@intel.com>,
	"Li, Zhiquan1" <zhiquan1.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/3] x86/sgx: Fine grained SGX MCA behavior for virtualization
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 08:55:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <544990c9adf34c196a1e9333f6cdefb4ba39f2e8.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <076291f2-4bff-e1ac-e590-74b94b5c03ef@intel.com>

On Fri, 2022-11-04 at 09:34 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 11/4/22 09:26, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > I've been re-thinking about this #MC handle on virtual EPC by stepping back to
> > > the beginning, and I think we have more problems than this "whether kernel
> > > should enforce child cannot mmap() virtual EPC".
> > IMO, virtual EPC should be restricted to a single mm_struct, which is what was
> > originally proposed many years ago[*].  I should have pushed back harder, but by
> > that point I had mostly stopped caring about SGX.
> 
> Considering that we have VM_DONTCOPY set on the vepc VMA, this shouldn't
> be too hard to pull off.  We could just return -EBUSY if another mm
> comes around and tries to mmap() the fd.

Yes.  We can record the MM which opens /dev/sgx_vepc and reject mmap() from
other MMs.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-07  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-20  6:39 [PATCH v9 0/3] x86/sgx: fine grained SGX MCA behavior Zhiquan Li
2022-09-20  6:39 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] x86/sgx: Rename the owner field of struct sgx_epc_page as encl_owner Zhiquan Li
2022-09-20  6:39 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] x86/sgx: Introduce union with vepc_vaddr field for virtualization case Zhiquan Li
2022-10-10 23:10   ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-11  5:49     ` Zhiquan Li
2022-10-11 13:57       ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-12  4:42         ` Zhiquan Li
2022-10-12 11:17           ` Huang, Kai
2022-09-20  6:39 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] x86/sgx: Fine grained SGX MCA behavior for virtualization Zhiquan Li
2022-10-10 23:20   ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-11  4:44     ` Zhiquan Li
2022-10-11 14:04   ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-12  5:09     ` Zhiquan Li
2022-10-12 11:01       ` Huang, Kai
2022-10-12 11:54         ` jarkko
2022-10-12 20:56           ` Huang, Kai
2022-10-13  2:05         ` Zhiquan Li
2022-10-12 14:36       ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-13 14:40         ` Zhiquan Li
2022-10-13 15:39           ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-14  5:42             ` Zhiquan Li
2022-10-14  5:41               ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-13 15:44           ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-13 21:49             ` Huang, Kai
2022-10-13 22:02               ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-13 22:15                 ` Huang, Kai
2022-10-13 22:28                   ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-13 23:40                     ` Huang, Kai
2022-10-13 23:57                       ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-14  0:19                         ` Huang, Kai
2022-10-19 10:59                           ` Huang, Kai
2022-10-23 20:39                             ` jarkko
2022-10-24  1:32                               ` Zhiquan Li
2022-11-01  0:46                                 ` jarkko
2022-11-02  1:38                                   ` Zhiquan Li
2022-11-07 11:36                                     ` jarkko
2022-11-07 12:19                                       ` Zhiquan Li
2022-11-04 10:17                                   ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-04 16:26                                     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-04 16:34                                       ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-07  8:55                                         ` Huang, Kai [this message]
2022-11-07  8:54                                       ` Huang, Kai
2022-10-24 22:23                               ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-01  0:53                                 ` jarkko
2022-09-29  8:05 ` [PATCH v9 0/3] x86/sgx: fine grained SGX MCA behavior Zhiquan Li
2022-10-08  2:29 ` Zhiquan Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=544990c9adf34c196a1e9333f6cdefb4ba39f2e8.camel@intel.com \
    --to=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=cathy.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fan.du@intel.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=zhiquan1.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.