All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: "jarkko@kernel.org" <jarkko@kernel.org>
Cc: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"bp@suse.de" <bp@suse.de>, "Zhang, Cathy" <cathy.zhang@intel.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>, "Du, Fan" <fan.du@intel.com>,
	"Li, Zhiquan1" <zhiquan1.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/3] x86/sgx: Fine grained SGX MCA behavior for virtualization
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 20:56:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc475f04685d7ab2bd9fae6f7914cf58d9c59e23.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y0aq4azJwL8G8OKv@kernel.org>

On Wed, 2022-10-12 at 14:54 +0300, jarkko@kernel.org wrote:
> > Sharing virtual EPC instance will very likely unexpectedly break enclaves in
> > all
> > VMs.  Whether kernel should explicitly prevent is another topic. To me I
> > don't
> > see strong reason to enforce in the kernel.  For instance, multiple VMs can
> > map
> > the same file as memory backend with MAP_SHARED, in which case they can all
> > break.  Userspace should use virtual EPC in the right way.
> 
> Broadly speaking, for most of the time, and for any topic, kernel should
> not prevent anything, unless it can break kernel's internal state.

Good to know.  Thanks you.

-- 
Thanks,
-Kai



  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-12 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-20  6:39 [PATCH v9 0/3] x86/sgx: fine grained SGX MCA behavior Zhiquan Li
2022-09-20  6:39 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] x86/sgx: Rename the owner field of struct sgx_epc_page as encl_owner Zhiquan Li
2022-09-20  6:39 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] x86/sgx: Introduce union with vepc_vaddr field for virtualization case Zhiquan Li
2022-10-10 23:10   ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-11  5:49     ` Zhiquan Li
2022-10-11 13:57       ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-12  4:42         ` Zhiquan Li
2022-10-12 11:17           ` Huang, Kai
2022-09-20  6:39 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] x86/sgx: Fine grained SGX MCA behavior for virtualization Zhiquan Li
2022-10-10 23:20   ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-11  4:44     ` Zhiquan Li
2022-10-11 14:04   ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-12  5:09     ` Zhiquan Li
2022-10-12 11:01       ` Huang, Kai
2022-10-12 11:54         ` jarkko
2022-10-12 20:56           ` Huang, Kai [this message]
2022-10-13  2:05         ` Zhiquan Li
2022-10-12 14:36       ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-13 14:40         ` Zhiquan Li
2022-10-13 15:39           ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-14  5:42             ` Zhiquan Li
2022-10-14  5:41               ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-13 15:44           ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-13 21:49             ` Huang, Kai
2022-10-13 22:02               ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-13 22:15                 ` Huang, Kai
2022-10-13 22:28                   ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-13 23:40                     ` Huang, Kai
2022-10-13 23:57                       ` Dave Hansen
2022-10-14  0:19                         ` Huang, Kai
2022-10-19 10:59                           ` Huang, Kai
2022-10-23 20:39                             ` jarkko
2022-10-24  1:32                               ` Zhiquan Li
2022-11-01  0:46                                 ` jarkko
2022-11-02  1:38                                   ` Zhiquan Li
2022-11-07 11:36                                     ` jarkko
2022-11-07 12:19                                       ` Zhiquan Li
2022-11-04 10:17                                   ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-04 16:26                                     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-04 16:34                                       ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-07  8:55                                         ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-07  8:54                                       ` Huang, Kai
2022-10-24 22:23                               ` Huang, Kai
2022-11-01  0:53                                 ` jarkko
2022-09-29  8:05 ` [PATCH v9 0/3] x86/sgx: fine grained SGX MCA behavior Zhiquan Li
2022-10-08  2:29 ` Zhiquan Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dc475f04685d7ab2bd9fae6f7914cf58d9c59e23.camel@intel.com \
    --to=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=cathy.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fan.du@intel.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=zhiquan1.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.