All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
To: Abhilash Kesavan <kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
	Naveen Krishna <naveenkrishna.ch@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] arch: arm64: Enable support for Samsung Exynos7 SoC
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 17:47:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <544E7721.3040108@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM4voanMX__N6=q8gg1LEGxqGTtByJXPdj+oAucHoyDh5ybaEA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Abhilash,

On 24/10/14 16:32, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Abhilash Kesavan
> <kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> wrote:
>>> Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>>> On 30.09.2014 17:12, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The clock patches look good to me, but since they are doing quite a lot
>>>>>> of code moving I'd prefer to take them through clk tree. Based on the
>>>>>> fact that there are no code dependencies between clock patches and
>>>>>> remaining ones and Exynos7 is a new material for 3.18, I'm inclined to
>>>>>> apply them to my tree if nobody minds.
>>>>>
>>>>> Will you be picking up the clock changes soon ?
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to do so. Kukjin, since clock changes are a part of this
>>>> series, might I have your Ack for them to be applied separately?
>>>>
>>> Sure, I'm fine so please go ahead with my ack on the changes.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks for your asking.
>>
>> Can you please pick up the clock changes now that Kukjin has ack'ed it.
> 
> Sylwester, you mentioned in another thread that Tomasz might not be
> available for the next few days. Could you please consider applying
> the clock changes in this series to samsung clk-next if they look OK ?
> 
> Please take a look at clock changes at
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg370673.html too.

I've picked up patches from the $subject series.  But please see my
comment the the second series you've pointed out with the link above.
If you decide to rearrange changes to exynos7-clk.h header file among
those two series I will drop that 4 patches.  Perhaps you could gather
all pending exynos7 clk patches, fix any issues and send to me in one
series ?
I'd like to avoid modifying indices assigned to specific clocks in
subsequent patches, DT binding should be defined in advance and ideally
be specifying exact indices for each possible clock.

--
Thanks,
Sylwester

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: s.nawrocki@samsung.com (Sylwester Nawrocki)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/8] arch: arm64: Enable support for Samsung Exynos7 SoC
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 17:47:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <544E7721.3040108@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM4voanMX__N6=q8gg1LEGxqGTtByJXPdj+oAucHoyDh5ybaEA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Abhilash,

On 24/10/14 16:32, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Abhilash Kesavan
> <kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> wrote:
>>> Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>>> On 30.09.2014 17:12, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The clock patches look good to me, but since they are doing quite a lot
>>>>>> of code moving I'd prefer to take them through clk tree. Based on the
>>>>>> fact that there are no code dependencies between clock patches and
>>>>>> remaining ones and Exynos7 is a new material for 3.18, I'm inclined to
>>>>>> apply them to my tree if nobody minds.
>>>>>
>>>>> Will you be picking up the clock changes soon ?
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to do so. Kukjin, since clock changes are a part of this
>>>> series, might I have your Ack for them to be applied separately?
>>>>
>>> Sure, I'm fine so please go ahead with my ack on the changes.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks for your asking.
>>
>> Can you please pick up the clock changes now that Kukjin has ack'ed it.
> 
> Sylwester, you mentioned in another thread that Tomasz might not be
> available for the next few days. Could you please consider applying
> the clock changes in this series to samsung clk-next if they look OK ?
> 
> Please take a look at clock changes at
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg370673.html too.

I've picked up patches from the $subject series.  But please see my
comment the the second series you've pointed out with the link above.
If you decide to rearrange changes to exynos7-clk.h header file among
those two series I will drop that 4 patches.  Perhaps you could gather
all pending exynos7 clk patches, fix any issues and send to me in one
series ?
I'd like to avoid modifying indices assigned to specific clocks in
subsequent patches, DT binding should be defined in advance and ideally
be specifying exact indices for each possible clock.

--
Thanks,
Sylwester

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-27 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-22  4:47 [PATCH v5 0/8] arch: arm64: Enable support for Samsung Exynos7 SoC Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:47 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:47 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] clk: samsung: add support for 145xx and 1460x PLLs Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:47   ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:47 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] clk: samsung: Factor out the common code to clk.c Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:47   ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:47 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] clk: samsung: Add fixed_factor_clocks field to struct exynos_cmu_info Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:47   ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:47 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] clk: samsung: add initial clock support for Exynos7 SoC Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:47   ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:47 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] arm64: dts: Add initial device tree support for EXYNOS7 Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:47   ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:47 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] arm64: exynos7: Enable ARMv8 based Exynos7 (SoC) support Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:47   ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:47 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] arm64: Enable Exynos7 SOC in the defconfig Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:47   ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:47 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] arm64: dts: add <dt-bindings/> symlink Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:47   ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-23  7:46   ` Chanho Park
2014-09-23  7:46     ` Chanho Park
2014-09-23  8:54     ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-23  8:54       ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  8:52 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] arch: arm64: Enable support for Samsung Exynos7 SoC Tomasz Figa
2014-09-22  8:52   ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-30 15:12   ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-30 15:12     ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-30 15:56     ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-30 15:56       ` Tomasz Figa
2014-10-07  4:16       ` Kukjin Kim
2014-10-07  4:16         ` Kukjin Kim
2014-10-08  5:48         ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-10-08  5:48           ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-10-24 14:32           ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-10-24 14:32             ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-10-27 16:47             ` Sylwester Nawrocki [this message]
2014-10-27 16:47               ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2014-09-23  7:50 ` Chanho Park
2014-09-23  7:50   ` Chanho Park
2014-09-23  8:48   ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-23  8:48     ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-30 15:15     ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-30 15:15       ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-30 15:50       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-30 15:50         ` Catalin Marinas
2014-10-08  5:46         ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-10-08  5:46           ` Abhilash Kesavan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-09-22  4:34 Abhilash Kesavan
2014-09-22  4:34 ` Abhilash Kesavan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=544E7721.3040108@samsung.com \
    --to=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com \
    --cc=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naveenkrishna.ch@gmail.com \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.