Re: [PATCH 0/9] qcom: Add support for TSENS driver

From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sboyd@codeaurora.org, nrajan@codeaurora.org, lina.iyer@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] qcom: Add support for TSENS driver
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:26:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C9B19A.9040901@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436348838-22671-1-git-send-email-rnayak@codeaurora.org>

Hi Rajendra,

On 08/07/15 10:47, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Changes since RFC:
> * Added support for 8916 and 8084
> * Based off the latest nvmem framework patches [1]
> * Minor review fixes for comments mostly from Lina
>
> ** I have also added irq support using the hardware
> trip point support series [2]. Will post that
> out seperately.
>
> This is an attempt to have a single TSENS driver for
> the different versions of the TSENS IP that exist, on
> different qcom msm/apq SoCs'
> Support is added for msm8916, msm8960 and msm8974 families.
> Based on top of the latest nvmem framework patches [2]
>
> A lot of the work is based of original code from Stephen Boyd
> and Siddartha Mohanadoss. I have also picked some of what
> Narendran Rajan did in his attempt to upstream the support
> for 8960 family. I could not keep the original authorship on
> any of the patches because I ended up moving the code around
> quite a bit in an effort to have a single driver for the
> various devices. I would be glad to change the authorship
> for any of the patches if needed.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/22/609
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/20/472
>
> Rajendra Nayak (8):
>    thermal: qcom: tsens: Add a skeletal TSENS drivers
>    thermal: qcom: tsens-8916: Add support for 8916 family of SoCs
>    thermal: qcom: tsens-8974: Add support for 8974 family of SoCs
>    thermal: qcom: tsens-8960: Add support for 8960 family of SoCs
>    arm: dts: msm8974: Add thermal zones, tsens and eeprom nodes
>    arm: dts: apq8064: Add thermal zones, tsens and eeprom nodes
>    arm: dts: apq8084: Add thermal zones, tsens and eeprom nodes
>    arm64: dts: msm8916: Add thermal zones, tsens and eeprom nodes
>
> Srinivas Kandagatla (1):
>    clk: qcom: gcc-msm8960: add child devices support.
>
>   .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.txt     |  37 +++
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi                | 108 ++++++++
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi                | 105 ++++++++
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi                | 105 ++++++++
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi              |  66 +++++
>   drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8960.c                     |   4 +-
>   drivers/thermal/Kconfig                            |   5 +
>   drivers/thermal/Makefile                           |   1 +
>   drivers/thermal/qcom/Kconfig                       |  10 +
>   drivers/thermal/qcom/Makefile                      |   2 +
>   drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-8916.c                  | 107 ++++++++
>   drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-8960.c                  | 291 +++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-8974.c                  | 239 +++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c                | 128 +++++++++
>   drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c                       | 209 +++++++++++++++
>   drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h                       |  69 +++++
>   16 files changed, 1485 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.txt
>   create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/qcom/Kconfig
>   create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/qcom/Makefile
>   create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-8916.c
>   create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-8960.c
>   create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-8974.c
>   create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
>   create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
>   create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
>

Tested-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>

NVMEM framework in now available in linux-next.

Do you think we can get this in v4.3?

--srini