All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sugar <sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, heiko@sntech.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tiwai@suse.com,
	lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	perex@perex.cz, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: rockchip: i2s: add 8 channels capture and lrck-mode support
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 16:01:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5614D162.3020500@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150930184655.GX15635@sirena.org.uk>

Sorry for late reply, we were in the National Day Holiday.

在 10/1/2015 02:46, Mark Brown 写道:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 04:16:12PM +0800, sugar wrote:
>> 在 9/24/2015 00:24, Mark Brown 写道:
>
>>> My initial thought here is that the machine driver should be responsible
>>> for setting this and then the DAI driver should check to see if
>>> symmetric_rates are in use and configure itself appropriately.  Is there
>>> a reason why this won't work here?
>
>> It's for i2s ip configuration, in the most situation, there is no need
>> to use this property, except one case:
>
>> In order to save gpio pins for other function use, we may use single
>> lrck(tx or rx) pin. of course, it depends on product design. when in i2s
>> slave mode, we need to configure this to share lrck with tx/rx inside i2s
>> logic.
>
>> symmetric_rates flag works fine on rockchip platform, but it can't cover the
>> above case.
>
>> Do you have any suggestion about this or maybe there is no need to upstream
>> this special part?
>
> What makes you say that the symmetric_rates flag can't be used to cover
> this case?  What you describe above is hte normal reason for needing to
> enforce symmetric_rates.  The driver should be able to check if the flag
> has been set just as well as the core is.
>

Got it, How about the following modify?

if (dai->symmetric_rates)
	regmap_update_bits(i2s->regmap, I2S_CKR,
                            I2S_CKR_TRCM_MASK,
                            I2S_CKR_TRCM(val));



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sugar <sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, heiko@sntech.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
	tiwai@suse.com, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: rockchip: i2s: add 8 channels capture and lrck-mode support
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 16:01:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5614D162.3020500@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150930184655.GX15635@sirena.org.uk>

Sorry for late reply, we were in the National Day Holiday.

在 10/1/2015 02:46, Mark Brown 写道:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 04:16:12PM +0800, sugar wrote:
>> 在 9/24/2015 00:24, Mark Brown 写道:
>
>>> My initial thought here is that the machine driver should be responsible
>>> for setting this and then the DAI driver should check to see if
>>> symmetric_rates are in use and configure itself appropriately.  Is there
>>> a reason why this won't work here?
>
>> It's for i2s ip configuration, in the most situation, there is no need
>> to use this property, except one case:
>
>> In order to save gpio pins for other function use, we may use single
>> lrck(tx or rx) pin. of course, it depends on product design. when in i2s
>> slave mode, we need to configure this to share lrck with tx/rx inside i2s
>> logic.
>
>> symmetric_rates flag works fine on rockchip platform, but it can't cover the
>> above case.
>
>> Do you have any suggestion about this or maybe there is no need to upstream
>> this special part?
>
> What makes you say that the symmetric_rates flag can't be used to cover
> this case?  What you describe above is hte normal reason for needing to
> enforce symmetric_rates.  The driver should be able to check if the flag
> has been set just as well as the core is.
>

Got it, How about the following modify?

if (dai->symmetric_rates)
	regmap_update_bits(i2s->regmap, I2S_CKR,
                            I2S_CKR_TRCM_MASK,
                            I2S_CKR_TRCM(val));


_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com (sugar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: rockchip: i2s: add 8 channels capture and lrck-mode support
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 16:01:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5614D162.3020500@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150930184655.GX15635@sirena.org.uk>

Sorry for late reply, we were in the National Day Holiday.

? 10/1/2015 02:46, Mark Brown ??:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 04:16:12PM +0800, sugar wrote:
>> ? 9/24/2015 00:24, Mark Brown ??:
>
>>> My initial thought here is that the machine driver should be responsible
>>> for setting this and then the DAI driver should check to see if
>>> symmetric_rates are in use and configure itself appropriately.  Is there
>>> a reason why this won't work here?
>
>> It's for i2s ip configuration, in the most situation, there is no need
>> to use this property, except one case:
>
>> In order to save gpio pins for other function use, we may use single
>> lrck(tx or rx) pin. of course, it depends on product design. when in i2s
>> slave mode, we need to configure this to share lrck with tx/rx inside i2s
>> logic.
>
>> symmetric_rates flag works fine on rockchip platform, but it can't cover the
>> above case.
>
>> Do you have any suggestion about this or maybe there is no need to upstream
>> this special part?
>
> What makes you say that the symmetric_rates flag can't be used to cover
> this case?  What you describe above is hte normal reason for needing to
> enforce symmetric_rates.  The driver should be able to check if the flag
> has been set just as well as the core is.
>

Got it, How about the following modify?

if (dai->symmetric_rates)
	regmap_update_bits(i2s->regmap, I2S_CKR,
                            I2S_CKR_TRCM_MASK,
                            I2S_CKR_TRCM(val));

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-07  8:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-23  3:41 [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: rockchip: i2s: add 8 channels capture and lrck-mode Sugar Zhang
2015-09-23  3:41 ` Sugar Zhang
2015-09-23  3:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: rockchip: i2s: add 8 channels capture and lrck-mode support Sugar Zhang
2015-09-23  3:41   ` Sugar Zhang
2015-09-23 16:24   ` Mark Brown
2015-09-23 16:24     ` Mark Brown
2015-09-28  8:16     ` sugar
2015-09-28  8:16       ` sugar
2015-09-28  8:16       ` sugar
2015-09-30 18:46       ` Mark Brown
2015-09-30 18:46         ` Mark Brown
2015-10-07  8:01         ` sugar [this message]
2015-10-07  8:01           ` sugar
2015-10-07  8:01           ` sugar
2015-10-07  9:27           ` Mark Brown
2015-10-07  9:27             ` Mark Brown
2015-10-07  9:39             ` Mark Brown
2015-10-07  9:39               ` Mark Brown
2015-10-07  9:39               ` Mark Brown
2015-10-07 10:01               ` sugar
2015-10-07 10:01                 ` sugar
2015-10-07 10:01                 ` sugar
2015-10-07 13:04           ` [alsa-devel] " Caleb Crome
2015-10-07 13:04             ` Caleb Crome
2015-10-08  1:47             ` sugar
2015-10-08  1:47               ` sugar
2015-10-08  1:47               ` sugar
2015-10-08  2:36               ` [alsa-devel] " Caleb Crome
2015-10-08  2:36                 ` Caleb Crome
2015-10-08  2:44                 ` sugar
2015-10-08  2:44                   ` sugar
2015-10-08  3:19                   ` Caleb Crome
2015-10-08  3:19                     ` Caleb Crome
2015-10-08  3:59                     ` sugar
2015-10-08  3:59                       ` sugar
2015-10-08  3:59                       ` sugar
2015-09-23  3:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: DT bindings: rockchip-i2s: add capture and lrck-mode Sugar Zhang
2015-09-23  3:41   ` Sugar Zhang
2015-09-23 16:20   ` Mark Brown
2015-09-23 16:20     ` Mark Brown
2015-09-23 16:20     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5614D162.3020500@rock-chips.com \
    --to=sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.