From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@gmail.com> Cc: "Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>, "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>, kgene <kgene@kernel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozłowski" <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Normalize exynos defconfig Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 18:38:05 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <56251C6D.9000708@osg.samsung.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAGOxZ52bGrHo0DzjhyjGPXwX0CWUn0Oqkx-EGZY51zC5FWcAKw@mail.gmail.com> Hello Alim, On 10/19/2015 05:58 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote: > Hi Javier, > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas > <javier@osg.samsung.com> wrote: >> Hello Alim, >> >> On 10/19/2015 08:03 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote: >>> make savedefconfig result in some difference, lets normalize the >>> defconfig. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> >>> --- >> >> Did you make savedefconfig against v4.3-rc6 or tot linux-next? >> > These are based on v4.3-rc5. > >> I remember we had issues in the past due savedefconfig made against >> linux-next but then some of the patches in linux-next not making it >> to the next release. So I think it should be good to mention what's >> the base used for this patch. >> > Ah, ok I didn't follow that, will check again on Linux-next as well as IIRC the problem was in that case that a patch was adding a new select that made the symbol not necessary in the defconfig. So a patch against linux-next was posted removing the unneeded symbol but at the end the select patch didn't make it to the release but the one removing the symbol did. > on 4.3-rc5 > OK, using 4.3-rcX should be safe AFAICT. >>> arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig | 8 ++------ >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig >>> index 1ff2bfa2e183..3349713e6c63 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig >>> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig >>> @@ -99,10 +99,8 @@ CONFIG_SENSORS_LM90=y >>> CONFIG_SENSORS_NTC_THERMISTOR=y >>> CONFIG_SENSORS_PWM_FAN=y >>> CONFIG_SENSORS_INA2XX=y >>> -CONFIG_THERMAL=y >>> CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL=y >>> CONFIG_THERMAL_EMULATION=y >>> -CONFIG_EXYNOS_THERMAL=y >> >> I would prefer to split all the changes that removes symbols into a >> separate patch explaining why these are not needed anymore (i.e: it >> is selected now by symbol $foo). >> > Ok ..let me rebase my patches and check these config changes again.... Thanks, the changes looks good to me though so please feel free to add my Reviewed-by tag if you re-spin and split the changes. Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: javier@osg.samsung.com (Javier Martinez Canillas) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 5/7] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Normalize exynos defconfig Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 18:38:05 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <56251C6D.9000708@osg.samsung.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAGOxZ52bGrHo0DzjhyjGPXwX0CWUn0Oqkx-EGZY51zC5FWcAKw@mail.gmail.com> Hello Alim, On 10/19/2015 05:58 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote: > Hi Javier, > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas > <javier@osg.samsung.com> wrote: >> Hello Alim, >> >> On 10/19/2015 08:03 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote: >>> make savedefconfig result in some difference, lets normalize the >>> defconfig. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> >>> --- >> >> Did you make savedefconfig against v4.3-rc6 or tot linux-next? >> > These are based on v4.3-rc5. > >> I remember we had issues in the past due savedefconfig made against >> linux-next but then some of the patches in linux-next not making it >> to the next release. So I think it should be good to mention what's >> the base used for this patch. >> > Ah, ok I didn't follow that, will check again on Linux-next as well as IIRC the problem was in that case that a patch was adding a new select that made the symbol not necessary in the defconfig. So a patch against linux-next was posted removing the unneeded symbol but at the end the select patch didn't make it to the release but the one removing the symbol did. > on 4.3-rc5 > OK, using 4.3-rcX should be safe AFAICT. >>> arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig | 8 ++------ >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig >>> index 1ff2bfa2e183..3349713e6c63 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig >>> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig >>> @@ -99,10 +99,8 @@ CONFIG_SENSORS_LM90=y >>> CONFIG_SENSORS_NTC_THERMISTOR=y >>> CONFIG_SENSORS_PWM_FAN=y >>> CONFIG_SENSORS_INA2XX=y >>> -CONFIG_THERMAL=y >>> CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL=y >>> CONFIG_THERMAL_EMULATION=y >>> -CONFIG_EXYNOS_THERMAL=y >> >> I would prefer to split all the changes that removes symbols into a >> separate patch explaining why these are not needed anymore (i.e: it >> is selected now by symbol $foo). >> > Ok ..let me rebase my patches and check these config changes again.... Thanks, the changes looks good to me though so please feel free to add my Reviewed-by tag if you re-spin and split the changes. Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-19 16:38 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-10-19 6:03 [PATCH 0/7] Switch to generic syscon regmap based drivers Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 6:03 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 6:03 ` [PATCH 1/7] arm: dts: Add syscon-{reboot, poweroff} nodes for exynos3250 SoCs Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 6:03 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 8:43 ` [1/7] " Pankaj Dubey 2015-10-19 8:43 ` Pankaj Dubey 2015-10-19 13:03 ` [PATCH 1/7] " Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-10-19 13:03 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-10-20 9:00 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-20 9:00 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 6:03 ` [PATCH 2/7] arm: dts: Add syscon-{reboot, poweroff} nodes for exynos4 Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 6:03 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 8:45 ` [2/7] " Pankaj Dubey 2015-10-19 8:45 ` Pankaj Dubey 2015-10-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 2/7] " Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-10-19 13:08 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-10-19 6:03 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm: dts: Add syscon-{reboot, poweroff} nodes for exynos5 Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 6:03 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 8:47 ` [3/7] " Pankaj Dubey 2015-10-19 8:47 ` Pankaj Dubey 2015-10-19 13:09 ` [PATCH 3/7] " Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-10-19 13:09 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-10-19 6:03 ` [PATCH 4/7] arm: dts: Add syscon-{reboot, poweroff} nodes for exynos5410 SoC Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 6:03 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 8:56 ` [4/7] " Pankaj Dubey 2015-10-19 8:56 ` Pankaj Dubey 2015-10-19 13:10 ` [PATCH 4/7] " Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-10-19 13:10 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-10-19 6:03 ` [PATCH 5/7] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Normalize exynos defconfig Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 6:03 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 13:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-10-19 13:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-10-19 15:58 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 15:58 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 16:38 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message] 2015-10-19 16:38 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-10-19 6:03 ` [PATCH 6/7] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable generic syscon-{reboot, poweroff} drivers Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 6:03 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 6:03 ` [PATCH 7/7] ARM: EXYNOS: Remove code for restart and poweroff for exynos SoCs Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 6:03 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 7:00 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-10-19 7:00 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-10-19 8:27 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 8:27 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 9:56 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-10-19 9:56 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-10-19 10:23 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 10:23 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 13:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-10-19 13:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-10-19 14:07 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-10-19 14:07 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-10-19 16:13 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 16:13 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 16:42 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-10-19 16:42 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2015-10-19 16:06 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 16:06 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-20 0:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-10-20 0:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-10-19 6:54 ` [PATCH 0/7] Switch to generic syscon regmap based drivers Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-10-19 6:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-10-19 7:40 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 7:40 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 16:08 ` Tobias Jakobi 2015-10-19 16:08 ` Tobias Jakobi 2015-10-19 16:36 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 16:36 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-19 21:18 ` Moritz Fischer 2015-10-19 21:18 ` Moritz Fischer 2015-10-20 8:56 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-20 8:56 ` Alim Akhtar 2015-10-20 13:43 ` Markus Reichl 2015-10-20 13:43 ` Markus Reichl 2015-10-20 13:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2015-10-20 13:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=56251C6D.9000708@osg.samsung.com \ --to=javier@osg.samsung.com \ --cc=alim.akhtar@gmail.com \ --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \ --cc=kgene@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.