All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [V3 PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option and force to select it
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:51:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5642207A.9070406@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151110103752.GH21606@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On 11/10/2015 2:37 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:09:55AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>> FRAME_POINTER is defined in lib/Kconfig.debug, it is unnecessary to redefine
>> it in arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug. Actually, the one defined in arm64 directory
>> is never used.
>
> That's not true since the arm64 definition seems to take precedence.
>
>> This adds a dependency on DEBUG_KERNEL for building with frame pointers.
>
> It doesn't because arm64 selects ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS.

Thanks for pointing it out. I misread the order of precedence, still 
think of C syntax at the first place.

Yang

>
>> ARM64 depends on frame pointer to get correct stack backtrace and need
>> FRAME_POINTER kconfig option enabled all the time.
>> However, currect implementation makes it could be disabled, so force it
>> to be selected by ARM64.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
>
> Patch applied but I changed the commit log slightly. Thanks.
>


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: yang.shi@linaro.org (Shi, Yang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [V3 PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option and force to select it
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:51:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5642207A.9070406@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151110103752.GH21606@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On 11/10/2015 2:37 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:09:55AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>> FRAME_POINTER is defined in lib/Kconfig.debug, it is unnecessary to redefine
>> it in arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug. Actually, the one defined in arm64 directory
>> is never used.
>
> That's not true since the arm64 definition seems to take precedence.
>
>> This adds a dependency on DEBUG_KERNEL for building with frame pointers.
>
> It doesn't because arm64 selects ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS.

Thanks for pointing it out. I misread the order of precedence, still 
think of C syntax at the first place.

Yang

>
>> ARM64 depends on frame pointer to get correct stack backtrace and need
>> FRAME_POINTER kconfig option enabled all the time.
>> However, currect implementation makes it could be disabled, so force it
>> to be selected by ARM64.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
>
> Patch applied but I changed the commit log slightly. Thanks.
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-10 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-09 18:09 [V3 PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option and force to select it Yang Shi
2015-11-09 18:09 ` Yang Shi
2015-11-10 10:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-10 10:37   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-10 11:09   ` yalin wang
2015-11-10 11:09     ` yalin wang
2015-11-10 11:35     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-10 11:35       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-10 11:43       ` yalin wang
2015-11-10 11:43         ` yalin wang
2015-11-10 11:54         ` Will Deacon
2015-11-10 11:54           ` Will Deacon
2015-11-10 16:51   ` Shi, Yang [this message]
2015-11-10 16:51     ` Shi, Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5642207A.9070406@linaro.org \
    --to=yang.shi@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.