All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>,
	Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] [media] Postpone the addition of MEDIA_IOC_G_TOPOLOGY
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:15:46 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56814412.4000903@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d029047c76d6d3e5e6a531080ede83f6e063f7db.1451311244.git.mchehab@osg.samsung.com>

Hello Mauro,

On 12/28/2015 11:03 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> There are a few discussions left with regards to this ioctl:
> 
> 1) the name of the new structs will contain _v2_ on it?
> 2) what's the best alternative to avoid compat32 issues?
> 
> Due to that, let's postpone the addition of this new ioctl to
> the next Kernel version, to give people more time to discuss it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
> ---
>

I agree that leaving the IOCTL out for now is the most sensible thing to
do since as you said, we didn't have time due holidays season to finish
the discussion about the struct media_v2_topology layout.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
	<mchehab-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org>,
	Linux Media Mailing List
	<linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
	<mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart
	<laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] [media] Postpone the addition of MEDIA_IOC_G_TOPOLOGY
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:15:46 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56814412.4000903@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d029047c76d6d3e5e6a531080ede83f6e063f7db.1451311244.git.mchehab-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org>

Hello Mauro,

On 12/28/2015 11:03 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> There are a few discussions left with regards to this ioctl:
> 
> 1) the name of the new structs will contain _v2_ on it?
> 2) what's the best alternative to avoid compat32 issues?
> 
> Due to that, let's postpone the addition of this new ioctl to
> the next Kernel version, to give people more time to discuss it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>

I agree that leaving the IOCTL out for now is the most sensible thing to
do since as you said, we didn't have time due holidays season to finish
the discussion about the struct media_v2_topology layout.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-28 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-28 14:03 [PATCH RFC] [media] Postpone the addition of MEDIA_IOC_G_TOPOLOGY Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2015-12-28 14:03 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2015-12-28 14:15 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2015-12-28 14:15   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-12-28 15:37 ` Shuah Khan
2015-12-28 15:44   ` Greg KH
2015-12-28 15:44     ` Greg KH
2015-12-28 16:05     ` Shuah Khan
2015-12-28 16:05       ` Shuah Khan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-12-28 13:57 Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56814412.4000903@osg.samsung.com \
    --to=javier@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
    --cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
    --cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.