All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, "Suthikulpanit,
	Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/44] arm64: dma-mapping: Use unsigned long for dma_attrs
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:51:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <575A9BC4.3090603@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465553521-27303-6-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

Hi Krzysztof,

On 10/06/16 11:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Split out subsystem specific changes for easier reviews. This will be
> squashed with main commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 0ef620a34c4e..a7686028dfeb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
>
>   #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>
> -static pgprot_t __get_dma_pgprot(const struct dma_attrs *attrs, pgprot_t prot,
> +static pgprot_t __get_dma_pgprot(unsigned long attrs, pgprot_t prot,
>   				 bool coherent)

Is this series intended to replace the patches currently in -next adding 
that "const"? (I was momentarily puzzled why this wouldn't apply locally)

>   {
>   	if (!coherent || dma_get_attr(DMA_ATTR_WRITE_COMBINE, attrs))
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static int __free_from_pool(void *start, size_t size)
>
>   static void *__dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   				  dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flags,
> -				  const struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				  unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	if (dev == NULL) {
>   		WARN_ONCE(1, "Use an actual device structure for DMA allocation\n");
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>
>   static void __dma_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   				void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
> -				const struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	bool freed;
>   	phys_addr_t paddr = dma_to_phys(dev, dma_handle);
> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static void __dma_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>
>   static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   			 dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flags,
> -			 struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			 unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	struct page *page;
>   	void *ptr, *coherent_ptr;
> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ no_mem:
>
>   static void __dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   		       void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
> -		       struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +		       unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	void *swiotlb_addr = phys_to_virt(dma_to_phys(dev, dma_handle));
>
> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static void __dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   static dma_addr_t __swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
>   				     unsigned long offset, size_t size,
>   				     enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -				     struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				     unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	dma_addr_t dev_addr;
>
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static dma_addr_t __swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
>
>   static void __swiotlb_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
>   				 size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -				 struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				 unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	if (!is_device_dma_coherent(dev))
>   		__dma_unmap_area(phys_to_virt(dma_to_phys(dev, dev_addr)), size, dir);
> @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static void __swiotlb_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
>
>   static int __swiotlb_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
>   				  int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -				  struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				  unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	struct scatterlist *sg;
>   	int i, ret;
> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static int __swiotlb_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
>   static void __swiotlb_unmap_sg_attrs(struct device *dev,
>   				     struct scatterlist *sgl, int nelems,
>   				     enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -				     struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				     unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	struct scatterlist *sg;
>   	int i;
> @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ static void __swiotlb_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *dev,
>   static int __swiotlb_mmap(struct device *dev,
>   			  struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   			  void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
> -			  struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			  unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	int ret = -ENXIO;
>   	unsigned long nr_vma_pages = (vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start) >>
> @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ static int __swiotlb_mmap(struct device *dev,
>
>   static int __swiotlb_get_sgtable(struct device *dev, struct sg_table *sgt,
>   				 void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t handle, size_t size,
> -				 struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				 unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	int ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> @@ -425,21 +425,21 @@ out:
>
>   static void *__dummy_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   			   dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flags,
> -			   struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			   unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	return NULL;
>   }
>
>   static void __dummy_free(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   			 void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
> -			 struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			 unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   }
>
>   static int __dummy_mmap(struct device *dev,
>   			struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   			void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
> -			struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	return -ENXIO;
>   }
> @@ -447,20 +447,20 @@ static int __dummy_mmap(struct device *dev,
>   static dma_addr_t __dummy_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
>   				   unsigned long offset, size_t size,
>   				   enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -				   struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				   unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	return DMA_ERROR_CODE;
>   }
>
>   static void __dummy_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
>   			       size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -			       struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			       unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   }
>
>   static int __dummy_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
>   			  int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -			  struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			  unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ static int __dummy_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
>   static void __dummy_unmap_sg(struct device *dev,
>   			     struct scatterlist *sgl, int nelems,
>   			     enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -			     struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			     unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   }
>
> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static void flush_page(struct device *dev, const void *virt, phys_addr_t phys)
>
>   static void *__iommu_alloc_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   				 dma_addr_t *handle, gfp_t gfp,
> -				 struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				 unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	bool coherent = is_device_dma_coherent(dev);
>   	int ioprot = dma_direction_to_prot(DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, coherent);
> @@ -600,7 +600,8 @@ static void *__iommu_alloc_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   }
>
>   static void __iommu_free_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
> -			       dma_addr_t handle, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			       dma_addr_t handle,
> +			       unsigned long attrs)

Nit: unnecessary line break?

Otherwise, though, I'm all for the idea;

Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

>   {
>   	size_t iosize = size;
>
> @@ -616,7 +617,7 @@ static void __iommu_free_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>   	 * Hence how dodgy the below logic looks...
>   	 */
>   	if (__in_atomic_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
> -		iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, handle, iosize, 0, NULL);
> +		iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, handle, iosize, 0, 0);
>   		__free_from_pool(cpu_addr, size);
>   	} else if (is_vmalloc_addr(cpu_addr)){
>   		struct vm_struct *area = find_vm_area(cpu_addr);
> @@ -626,14 +627,14 @@ static void __iommu_free_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>   		iommu_dma_free(dev, area->pages, iosize, &handle);
>   		dma_common_free_remap(cpu_addr, size, VM_USERMAP);
>   	} else {
> -		iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, handle, iosize, 0, NULL);
> +		iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, handle, iosize, 0, 0);
>   		__free_pages(virt_to_page(cpu_addr), get_order(size));
>   	}
>   }
>
>   static int __iommu_mmap_attrs(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   			      void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
> -			      struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			      unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	struct vm_struct *area;
>   	int ret;
> @@ -653,7 +654,7 @@ static int __iommu_mmap_attrs(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>
>   static int __iommu_get_sgtable(struct device *dev, struct sg_table *sgt,
>   			       void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
> -			       size_t size, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			       size_t size, unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	unsigned int count = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>   	struct vm_struct *area = find_vm_area(cpu_addr);
> @@ -694,7 +695,7 @@ static void __iommu_sync_single_for_device(struct device *dev,
>   static dma_addr_t __iommu_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
>   				   unsigned long offset, size_t size,
>   				   enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -				   struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				   unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	bool coherent = is_device_dma_coherent(dev);
>   	int prot = dma_direction_to_prot(dir, coherent);
> @@ -709,7 +710,7 @@ static dma_addr_t __iommu_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
>
>   static void __iommu_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
>   			       size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -			       struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			       unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	if (!dma_get_attr(DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC, attrs))
>   		__iommu_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, dev_addr, size, dir);
> @@ -747,7 +748,7 @@ static void __iommu_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *dev,
>
>   static int __iommu_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
>   				int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -				struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	bool coherent = is_device_dma_coherent(dev);
>
> @@ -761,7 +762,7 @@ static int __iommu_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
>   static void __iommu_unmap_sg_attrs(struct device *dev,
>   				   struct scatterlist *sgl, int nelems,
>   				   enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -				   struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				   unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	if (!dma_get_attr(DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC, attrs))
>   		__iommu_sync_sg_for_cpu(dev, sgl, nelems, dir);
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: robin.murphy@arm.com (Robin Murphy)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 05/44] arm64: dma-mapping: Use unsigned long for dma_attrs
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:51:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <575A9BC4.3090603@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465553521-27303-6-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

Hi Krzysztof,

On 10/06/16 11:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Split out subsystem specific changes for easier reviews. This will be
> squashed with main commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 0ef620a34c4e..a7686028dfeb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
>
>   #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>
> -static pgprot_t __get_dma_pgprot(const struct dma_attrs *attrs, pgprot_t prot,
> +static pgprot_t __get_dma_pgprot(unsigned long attrs, pgprot_t prot,
>   				 bool coherent)

Is this series intended to replace the patches currently in -next adding 
that "const"? (I was momentarily puzzled why this wouldn't apply locally)

>   {
>   	if (!coherent || dma_get_attr(DMA_ATTR_WRITE_COMBINE, attrs))
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static int __free_from_pool(void *start, size_t size)
>
>   static void *__dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   				  dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flags,
> -				  const struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				  unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	if (dev == NULL) {
>   		WARN_ONCE(1, "Use an actual device structure for DMA allocation\n");
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>
>   static void __dma_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   				void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
> -				const struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	bool freed;
>   	phys_addr_t paddr = dma_to_phys(dev, dma_handle);
> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static void __dma_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>
>   static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   			 dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flags,
> -			 struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			 unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	struct page *page;
>   	void *ptr, *coherent_ptr;
> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ no_mem:
>
>   static void __dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   		       void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
> -		       struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +		       unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	void *swiotlb_addr = phys_to_virt(dma_to_phys(dev, dma_handle));
>
> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static void __dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   static dma_addr_t __swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
>   				     unsigned long offset, size_t size,
>   				     enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -				     struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				     unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	dma_addr_t dev_addr;
>
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static dma_addr_t __swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
>
>   static void __swiotlb_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
>   				 size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -				 struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				 unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	if (!is_device_dma_coherent(dev))
>   		__dma_unmap_area(phys_to_virt(dma_to_phys(dev, dev_addr)), size, dir);
> @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static void __swiotlb_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
>
>   static int __swiotlb_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
>   				  int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -				  struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				  unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	struct scatterlist *sg;
>   	int i, ret;
> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static int __swiotlb_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
>   static void __swiotlb_unmap_sg_attrs(struct device *dev,
>   				     struct scatterlist *sgl, int nelems,
>   				     enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -				     struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				     unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	struct scatterlist *sg;
>   	int i;
> @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ static void __swiotlb_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *dev,
>   static int __swiotlb_mmap(struct device *dev,
>   			  struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   			  void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
> -			  struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			  unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	int ret = -ENXIO;
>   	unsigned long nr_vma_pages = (vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start) >>
> @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ static int __swiotlb_mmap(struct device *dev,
>
>   static int __swiotlb_get_sgtable(struct device *dev, struct sg_table *sgt,
>   				 void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t handle, size_t size,
> -				 struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				 unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	int ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> @@ -425,21 +425,21 @@ out:
>
>   static void *__dummy_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   			   dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flags,
> -			   struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			   unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	return NULL;
>   }
>
>   static void __dummy_free(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   			 void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
> -			 struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			 unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   }
>
>   static int __dummy_mmap(struct device *dev,
>   			struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   			void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
> -			struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	return -ENXIO;
>   }
> @@ -447,20 +447,20 @@ static int __dummy_mmap(struct device *dev,
>   static dma_addr_t __dummy_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
>   				   unsigned long offset, size_t size,
>   				   enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -				   struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				   unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	return DMA_ERROR_CODE;
>   }
>
>   static void __dummy_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
>   			       size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -			       struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			       unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   }
>
>   static int __dummy_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
>   			  int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -			  struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			  unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ static int __dummy_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
>   static void __dummy_unmap_sg(struct device *dev,
>   			     struct scatterlist *sgl, int nelems,
>   			     enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -			     struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			     unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   }
>
> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static void flush_page(struct device *dev, const void *virt, phys_addr_t phys)
>
>   static void *__iommu_alloc_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   				 dma_addr_t *handle, gfp_t gfp,
> -				 struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				 unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	bool coherent = is_device_dma_coherent(dev);
>   	int ioprot = dma_direction_to_prot(DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, coherent);
> @@ -600,7 +600,8 @@ static void *__iommu_alloc_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>   }
>
>   static void __iommu_free_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
> -			       dma_addr_t handle, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			       dma_addr_t handle,
> +			       unsigned long attrs)

Nit: unnecessary line break?

Otherwise, though, I'm all for the idea;

Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

>   {
>   	size_t iosize = size;
>
> @@ -616,7 +617,7 @@ static void __iommu_free_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>   	 * Hence how dodgy the below logic looks...
>   	 */
>   	if (__in_atomic_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
> -		iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, handle, iosize, 0, NULL);
> +		iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, handle, iosize, 0, 0);
>   		__free_from_pool(cpu_addr, size);
>   	} else if (is_vmalloc_addr(cpu_addr)){
>   		struct vm_struct *area = find_vm_area(cpu_addr);
> @@ -626,14 +627,14 @@ static void __iommu_free_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
>   		iommu_dma_free(dev, area->pages, iosize, &handle);
>   		dma_common_free_remap(cpu_addr, size, VM_USERMAP);
>   	} else {
> -		iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, handle, iosize, 0, NULL);
> +		iommu_dma_unmap_page(dev, handle, iosize, 0, 0);
>   		__free_pages(virt_to_page(cpu_addr), get_order(size));
>   	}
>   }
>
>   static int __iommu_mmap_attrs(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   			      void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
> -			      struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			      unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	struct vm_struct *area;
>   	int ret;
> @@ -653,7 +654,7 @@ static int __iommu_mmap_attrs(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>
>   static int __iommu_get_sgtable(struct device *dev, struct sg_table *sgt,
>   			       void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
> -			       size_t size, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			       size_t size, unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	unsigned int count = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>   	struct vm_struct *area = find_vm_area(cpu_addr);
> @@ -694,7 +695,7 @@ static void __iommu_sync_single_for_device(struct device *dev,
>   static dma_addr_t __iommu_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
>   				   unsigned long offset, size_t size,
>   				   enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -				   struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				   unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	bool coherent = is_device_dma_coherent(dev);
>   	int prot = dma_direction_to_prot(dir, coherent);
> @@ -709,7 +710,7 @@ static dma_addr_t __iommu_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
>
>   static void __iommu_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
>   			       size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -			       struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +			       unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	if (!dma_get_attr(DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC, attrs))
>   		__iommu_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, dev_addr, size, dir);
> @@ -747,7 +748,7 @@ static void __iommu_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *dev,
>
>   static int __iommu_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
>   				int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -				struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	bool coherent = is_device_dma_coherent(dev);
>
> @@ -761,7 +762,7 @@ static int __iommu_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
>   static void __iommu_unmap_sg_attrs(struct device *dev,
>   				   struct scatterlist *sgl, int nelems,
>   				   enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -				   struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +				   unsigned long attrs)
>   {
>   	if (!dma_get_attr(DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC, attrs))
>   		__iommu_sync_sg_for_cpu(dev, sgl, nelems, dir);
>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-10 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-10 10:11 [PATCH v4 00/44] dma-mapping: Use unsigned long for dma_attrs Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 01/44] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 14:49   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-06-10 20:16     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 20:23       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-06-10 20:44         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 21:08           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-06-13 16:00     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-13 17:41       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 02/44] alpha: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 03/44] arc: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:54   ` Vineet Gupta
2016-06-10 10:54     ` Vineet Gupta
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 04/44] ARM: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 05/44] arm64: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:51   ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2016-06-10 10:51     ` Robin Murphy
2016-06-10 10:55     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:55       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 06/44] avr32: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 07/44] blackfin: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 08/44] c6x: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 09/44] cris: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 10/44] frv: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 11/44] drm/exynos: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 12/44] drm/mediatek: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 14/44] drm/nouveau: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 15/44] drm/rockship: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 16/44] infiniband: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
     [not found]   ` <1465553521-27303-17-git-send-email-k.kozlowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-10 18:18     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-06-10 18:18       ` Bart Van Assche
     [not found]       ` <b4d3a64b-afa6-fb2d-1516-831b5ea45129-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-13 15:08         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-13 15:08           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 17/44] iommu: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 18/44] [media] " Krzysztof Kozlowski
     [not found]   ` <575AB26E.4020401@st.com>
2016-06-10 12:37     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 19/44] xen: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 20/44] swiotlb: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 21/44] powerpc: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 22/44] video: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 23/44] x86: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 24/44] iommu: intel: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 25/44] h8300: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 26/44] hexagon: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 27/44] ia64: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 28/44] m68k: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 29/44] metag: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 30/44] microblaze: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 31/44] mips: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 32/44] mn10300: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 33/44] nios2: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 34/44] openrisc: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 35/44] parisc: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 36/44] misc: mic: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 37/44] s390: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 16:30   ` Gerald Schaefer
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 38/44] sh: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 39/44] sparc: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 17:43   ` David Miller
2016-06-10 17:43     ` David Miller
2016-06-10 20:03     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 20:03       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 40/44] tile: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 41/44] unicore32: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 42/44] xtensa: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:12 ` [PATCH v4 43/44] dma-mapping: Remove dma_get_attr Krzysztof Kozlowski
     [not found] ` <1465553521-27303-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-10 10:11   ` [PATCH v4 13/44] drm/msm: dma-mapping: Use unsigned long for dma_attrs Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:11     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:12   ` [PATCH v4 43/44] dma-mapping: Remove dma_get_attr Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:12     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:12     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:12     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-10 10:55     ` Vineet Gupta
2016-06-10 10:55       ` Vineet Gupta
2016-06-10 10:55       ` Vineet Gupta
2016-06-10 10:55       ` Vineet Gupta
2016-06-10 10:55       ` Vineet Gupta
2016-06-10 10:55       ` Vineet Gupta
2016-06-10 10:55     ` Vineet Gupta
2016-06-10 10:58     ` Robin Murphy
     [not found]     ` <1465553521-27303-44-git-send-email-k.kozlowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-10 10:58       ` Robin Murphy
2016-06-10 10:58         ` Robin Murphy
2016-06-10 10:58         ` Robin Murphy
2016-06-10 10:58         ` Robin Murphy
2016-06-10 10:12 ` [PATCH v4 44/44] dma-mapping: Document the DMA attributes next to the declaration Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=575A9BC4.3090603@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
    --cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.