From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jniethe5@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 01/12] powerpc: Rework PPC_RAW_xxx() macros for prefixed instructions
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 10:23:00 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d146b31b943e7ad674894421db4feef54804b9b.1621506159.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> (raw)
At the time being, we have PPC_RAW_PLXVP() and PPC_RAW_PSTXVP() which
provide a 64 bits value, and then it gets split by open coding to
format it into a 'struct ppc_inst' instruction.
Instead, define a PPC_RAW_xxx_P() and a PPC_RAW_xxx_S() to be used
as is.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h | 8 ++++----
arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c | 6 ++----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
index ac41776661e9..403067ba170e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
@@ -404,10 +404,10 @@
#define PPC_RAW_STXVP(xsp, a, i) (0x18000001 | __PPC_XSP(xsp) | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_DQ(i))
#define PPC_RAW_LXVPX(xtp, a, b) (0x7c00029a | __PPC_XTP(xtp) | ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
#define PPC_RAW_STXVPX(xsp, a, b) (0x7c00039a | __PPC_XSP(xsp) | ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
-#define PPC_RAW_PLXVP(xtp, i, a, pr) \
- ((PPC_PREFIX_8LS | __PPC_PRFX_R(pr) | IMM_D0(i)) << 32 | (0xe8000000 | __PPC_XTP(xtp) | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_D1(i)))
-#define PPC_RAW_PSTXVP(xsp, i, a, pr) \
- ((PPC_PREFIX_8LS | __PPC_PRFX_R(pr) | IMM_D0(i)) << 32 | (0xf8000000 | __PPC_XSP(xsp) | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_D1(i)))
+#define PPC_RAW_PLXVP_P(xtp, i, a, pr) (PPC_PREFIX_8LS | __PPC_PRFX_R(pr) | IMM_D0(i))
+#define PPC_RAW_PLXVP_S(xtp, i, a, pr) (0xe8000000 | __PPC_XTP(xtp) | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_D1(i))
+#define PPC_RAW_PSTXVP_P(xsp, i, a, pr) (PPC_PREFIX_8LS | __PPC_PRFX_R(pr) | IMM_D0(i))
+#define PPC_RAW_PSTXVP_S(xsp, i, a, pr) (0xf8000000 | __PPC_XSP(xsp) | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_D1(i))
#define PPC_RAW_NAP (0x4c000364)
#define PPC_RAW_SLEEP (0x4c0003a4)
#define PPC_RAW_WINKLE (0x4c0003e4)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c
index 783d1b85ecfe..f7c74f4f684b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c
@@ -824,8 +824,7 @@ static void __init test_plxvp_pstxvp(void)
* XTp = 32xTX + 2xTp
* let RA=3 R=0 D=d0||d1=0 R=0 Tp=1 TX=1
*/
- instr = ppc_inst_prefix(PPC_RAW_PLXVP(34, 0, 3, 0) >> 32,
- PPC_RAW_PLXVP(34, 0, 3, 0) & 0xffffffff);
+ instr = ppc_inst_prefix(PPC_RAW_PLXVP_P(34, 0, 3, 0), PPC_RAW_PLXVP_S(34, 0, 3, 0));
stepped = emulate_step(®s, instr);
if (stepped == 1 && cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_VSX)) {
@@ -853,8 +852,7 @@ static void __init test_plxvp_pstxvp(void)
* XSp = 32xSX + 2xSp
* let RA=3 D=d0||d1=0 R=0 Sp=1 SX=1
*/
- instr = ppc_inst_prefix(PPC_RAW_PSTXVP(34, 0, 3, 0) >> 32,
- PPC_RAW_PSTXVP(34, 0, 3, 0) & 0xffffffff);
+ instr = ppc_inst_prefix(PPC_RAW_PSTXVP_P(34, 0, 3, 0), PPC_RAW_PSTXVP_S(34, 0, 3, 0));
stepped = emulate_step(®s, instr);
--
2.25.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jniethe5@gmail.com
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 01/12] powerpc: Rework PPC_RAW_xxx() macros for prefixed instructions
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 10:23:00 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d146b31b943e7ad674894421db4feef54804b9b.1621506159.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> (raw)
At the time being, we have PPC_RAW_PLXVP() and PPC_RAW_PSTXVP() which
provide a 64 bits value, and then it gets split by open coding to
format it into a 'struct ppc_inst' instruction.
Instead, define a PPC_RAW_xxx_P() and a PPC_RAW_xxx_S() to be used
as is.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h | 8 ++++----
arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c | 6 ++----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
index ac41776661e9..403067ba170e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h
@@ -404,10 +404,10 @@
#define PPC_RAW_STXVP(xsp, a, i) (0x18000001 | __PPC_XSP(xsp) | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_DQ(i))
#define PPC_RAW_LXVPX(xtp, a, b) (0x7c00029a | __PPC_XTP(xtp) | ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
#define PPC_RAW_STXVPX(xsp, a, b) (0x7c00039a | __PPC_XSP(xsp) | ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
-#define PPC_RAW_PLXVP(xtp, i, a, pr) \
- ((PPC_PREFIX_8LS | __PPC_PRFX_R(pr) | IMM_D0(i)) << 32 | (0xe8000000 | __PPC_XTP(xtp) | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_D1(i)))
-#define PPC_RAW_PSTXVP(xsp, i, a, pr) \
- ((PPC_PREFIX_8LS | __PPC_PRFX_R(pr) | IMM_D0(i)) << 32 | (0xf8000000 | __PPC_XSP(xsp) | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_D1(i)))
+#define PPC_RAW_PLXVP_P(xtp, i, a, pr) (PPC_PREFIX_8LS | __PPC_PRFX_R(pr) | IMM_D0(i))
+#define PPC_RAW_PLXVP_S(xtp, i, a, pr) (0xe8000000 | __PPC_XTP(xtp) | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_D1(i))
+#define PPC_RAW_PSTXVP_P(xsp, i, a, pr) (PPC_PREFIX_8LS | __PPC_PRFX_R(pr) | IMM_D0(i))
+#define PPC_RAW_PSTXVP_S(xsp, i, a, pr) (0xf8000000 | __PPC_XSP(xsp) | ___PPC_RA(a) | IMM_D1(i))
#define PPC_RAW_NAP (0x4c000364)
#define PPC_RAW_SLEEP (0x4c0003a4)
#define PPC_RAW_WINKLE (0x4c0003e4)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c
index 783d1b85ecfe..f7c74f4f684b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c
@@ -824,8 +824,7 @@ static void __init test_plxvp_pstxvp(void)
* XTp = 32xTX + 2xTp
* let RA=3 R=0 D=d0||d1=0 R=0 Tp=1 TX=1
*/
- instr = ppc_inst_prefix(PPC_RAW_PLXVP(34, 0, 3, 0) >> 32,
- PPC_RAW_PLXVP(34, 0, 3, 0) & 0xffffffff);
+ instr = ppc_inst_prefix(PPC_RAW_PLXVP_P(34, 0, 3, 0), PPC_RAW_PLXVP_S(34, 0, 3, 0));
stepped = emulate_step(®s, instr);
if (stepped == 1 && cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_VSX)) {
@@ -853,8 +852,7 @@ static void __init test_plxvp_pstxvp(void)
* XSp = 32xSX + 2xSp
* let RA=3 D=d0||d1=0 R=0 Sp=1 SX=1
*/
- instr = ppc_inst_prefix(PPC_RAW_PSTXVP(34, 0, 3, 0) >> 32,
- PPC_RAW_PSTXVP(34, 0, 3, 0) & 0xffffffff);
+ instr = ppc_inst_prefix(PPC_RAW_PSTXVP_P(34, 0, 3, 0), PPC_RAW_PSTXVP_S(34, 0, 3, 0));
stepped = emulate_step(®s, instr);
--
2.25.0
next reply other threads:[~2021-05-20 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-20 10:23 Christophe Leroy [this message]
2021-05-20 10:23 ` [PATCH v1 01/12] powerpc: Rework PPC_RAW_xxx() macros for prefixed instructions Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` [PATCH v1 02/12] powerpc/opcodes: Add shorter macros for registers for use with PPC_RAW_xx() Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` [PATCH v1 03/12] powerpc/lib/code-patching: Use PPC_RAW_() macros Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` [PATCH v1 04/12] powerpc/signal: Use PPC_RAW_xx() macros Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` [PATCH v1 05/12] powerpc/modules: " Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` [PATCH v1 06/12] powerpc/security: Use PPC_RAW_BLR() and PPC_RAW_NOP() Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` [PATCH v1 07/12] powerpc/ftrace: Use PPC_RAW_MFLR() " Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` [PATCH v1 08/12] powerpc/ebpf64: Use PPC_RAW_MFLR() Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` [PATCH v1 09/12] powerpc/ebpf32: Use _Rx macros instead of __REG_Rx ones Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` [PATCH v1 10/12] powerpc/lib/feature-fixups: Use PPC_RAW_xxx() macros Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-15 1:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-06-15 1:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-05-20 10:23 ` [PATCH v1 11/12] powerpc/traps: Start using PPC_RAW_xx() macros Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` [PATCH v1 12/12] powerpc: Replace PPC_INST_NOP by PPC_RAW_NOP() Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:23 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-05-20 10:51 ` David Laight
2021-06-18 3:51 ` [PATCH v1 01/12] powerpc: Rework PPC_RAW_xxx() macros for prefixed instructions Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d146b31b943e7ad674894421db4feef54804b9b.1621506159.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.