Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: enable temperature driven fan control on Rock 5B

From: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
To: wens@kernel.org
Cc: Alexey Charkov <alchark@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: enable temperature driven fan control on Rock 5B
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 18:34:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e3e12d65e4919372e7fb02d56202393@manjaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v65--rgb2FqmG_0-w1-jUL0odqKXxiZJ-XPYA4uomfYmaQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Chen-Yu,

On 2024-02-01 15:26, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 2:22 AM Alexey Charkov <alchark@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> 
>> This enables thermal monitoring on Radxa Rock 5B and links the PWM
>> fan as an active cooling device managed automatically by the thermal
>> subsystem, with a target SoC temperature of 65C and a minimum-spin
>> interval from 55C to 65C to ensure airflow when the system gets warm
>> 
>> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Charkov <alchark@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts | 34 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts 
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts
>> index a0e303c3a1dc..b485edeef876 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dts
>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ led_rgb_b {
>> 
>>         fan: pwm-fan {
>>                 compatible = "pwm-fan";
>> -               cooling-levels = <0 95 145 195 255>;
>> +               cooling-levels = <0 120 150 180 210 240 255>;
>>                 fan-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>>                 pwms = <&pwm1 0 50000 0>;
>>                 #cooling-cells = <2>;
>> @@ -173,6 +173,34 @@ &cpu_l3 {
>>         cpu-supply = <&vdd_cpu_lit_s0>;
>>  };
>> 
>> +&package_thermal {
>> +       polling-delay = <1000>;
>> +
>> +       trips {
>> +               package_fan0: package-fan0 {
>> +                       temperature = <55000>;
>> +                       hysteresis = <2000>;
>> +                       type = "active";
>> +               };
>> +               package_fan1: package-fan1 {
>> +                       temperature = <65000>;
>> +                       hysteresis = <2000>;
>> +                       type = "active";
>> +               };
>> +       };
>> +
>> +       cooling-maps {
>> +               map0 {
>> +                       trip = <&package_fan0>;
>> +                       cooling-device = <&fan THERMAL_NO_LIMIT 1>;
>> +               };
>> +               map1 {
>> +                       trip = <&package_fan1>;
>> +                       cooling-device = <&fan 1 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>;
>> +               };
>> +       };
>> +};
>> +
>>  &i2c0 {
>>         pinctrl-names = "default";
>>         pinctrl-0 = <&i2c0m2_xfer>;
>> @@ -731,6 +759,10 @@ regulator-state-mem {
>>         };
>>  };
>> 
>> +&tsadc {
>> +       status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
> 
> Is there any reason this can't be enabled by default in the .dtsi file?
> The thermal sensor doesn't depend on anything external, so there should
> be no reason to push this down to the board level.

Actually, there is a reason.  Different boards can handle the critical
overheating differently, by letting the CRU or the PMIC handle it.  This
was also the case for the RK3399.

Please, have a look at the following DT properties, which are consumed
by drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c:
   - "rockchip,hw-tshut-mode"
   - "rockchip,hw-tshut-polarity"

See also page 1,372 of the RK3588 TRM v1.0.

This has also reminded me to check how is the Rock 5B actually wired,
just to make sure.  We actually need to provide the two DT properties
listed above, at least to avoid emitting the warnings.

>>  &uart2 {
>>         pinctrl-0 = <&uart2m0_xfer>;
>>         status = "okay";
>> 
>> --
>> 2.43.0