All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool v2 22/22] hw/rtc: ARM/arm64: Use MMIO at higher addresses
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 16:06:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <606d032e-d1f1-257f-eb1c-c471f2f20935@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210225005915.26423-23-andre.przywara@arm.com>

Hi Andre,

On 2/25/21 12:59 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Using the RTC device at its legacy I/O address as set by IBM in 1981
> was a kludge we used for simplicity on ARM platforms as well.
> However this imposes problems due to their missing alignment and overlap
> with the PCI I/O address space.
>
> Now that we can switch a device easily between using ioports and
> MMIO, let's move the RTC out of the first 4K of memory on ARM platforms.
>
> That should be transparent for well behaved guests, since the change is
> naturally reflected in the device tree.

Everything looks correct, compile tested for arm64 and x86-64. Also grep'ed for
0x70 (device ioport address) and DEVICE_BUS_IOPORT, no occurrence in the file
other than in the defines:

Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

Thanks,

Alex

>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
>  arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h |  3 +++
>  hw/rtc.c                          | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h b/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h
> index 633ea8fa..02100c48 100644
> --- a/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h
> +++ b/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@
>  #define ARM_UART_MMIO_BASE	ARM_MMIO_AREA
>  #define ARM_UART_MMIO_SIZE	0x10000
>  
> +#define ARM_RTC_MMIO_BASE	(ARM_UART_MMIO_BASE + ARM_UART_MMIO_SIZE)
> +#define ARM_RTC_MMIO_SIZE	0x10000
> +
>  #define KVM_FLASH_MMIO_BASE	(ARM_MMIO_AREA + 0x1000000)
>  #define KVM_FLASH_MAX_SIZE	0x1000000
>  
> diff --git a/hw/rtc.c b/hw/rtc.c
> index ee4c9102..aec31c52 100644
> --- a/hw/rtc.c
> +++ b/hw/rtc.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,15 @@
>  
>  #include <time.h>
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> +#define RTC_BUS_TYPE		DEVICE_BUS_MMIO
> +#define RTC_BASE_ADDRESS	ARM_RTC_MMIO_BASE
> +#else
> +/* PORT 0070-007F - CMOS RAM/RTC (REAL TIME CLOCK) */
> +#define RTC_BUS_TYPE		DEVICE_BUS_IOPORT
> +#define RTC_BASE_ADDRESS	0x70
> +#endif
> +
>  /*
>   * MC146818 RTC registers
>   */
> @@ -49,7 +58,7 @@ static void cmos_ram_io(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data,
>  	time_t ti;
>  
>  	if (is_write) {
> -		if (addr == 0x70) {	/* index register */
> +		if (addr == RTC_BASE_ADDRESS) {	/* index register */
>  			u8 value = ioport__read8(data);
>  
>  			vcpu->kvm->nmi_disabled	= value & (1UL << 7);
> @@ -70,7 +79,7 @@ static void cmos_ram_io(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data,
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (addr == 0x70)
> +	if (addr == RTC_BASE_ADDRESS)	/* index register is write-only */
>  		return;
>  
>  	time(&ti);
> @@ -127,7 +136,7 @@ static void generate_rtc_fdt_node(void *fdt,
>  							    u8 irq,
>  							    enum irq_type))
>  {
> -	u64 reg_prop[2] = { cpu_to_fdt64(0x70), cpu_to_fdt64(2) };
> +	u64 reg_prop[2] = { cpu_to_fdt64(RTC_BASE_ADDRESS), cpu_to_fdt64(2) };
>  
>  	_FDT(fdt_begin_node(fdt, "rtc"));
>  	_FDT(fdt_property_string(fdt, "compatible", "motorola,mc146818"));
> @@ -139,7 +148,7 @@ static void generate_rtc_fdt_node(void *fdt,
>  #endif
>  
>  struct device_header rtc_dev_hdr = {
> -	.bus_type = DEVICE_BUS_IOPORT,
> +	.bus_type = RTC_BUS_TYPE,
>  	.data = generate_rtc_fdt_node,
>  };
>  
> @@ -151,8 +160,8 @@ int rtc__init(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	if (r < 0)
>  		return r;
>  
> -	/* PORT 0070-007F - CMOS RAM/RTC (REAL TIME CLOCK) */
> -	r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0070, 2, cmos_ram_io, NULL);
> +	r = kvm__register_iotrap(kvm, RTC_BASE_ADDRESS, 2, cmos_ram_io, NULL,
> +				 RTC_BUS_TYPE);
>  	if (r < 0)
>  		goto out_device;
>  
> @@ -170,8 +179,7 @@ dev_init(rtc__init);
>  
>  int rtc__exit(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
> -	/* PORT 0070-007F - CMOS RAM/RTC (REAL TIME CLOCK) */
> -	kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x0070);
> +	kvm__deregister_iotrap(kvm, RTC_BASE_ADDRESS, RTC_BUS_TYPE);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool v2 22/22] hw/rtc: ARM/arm64: Use MMIO at higher addresses
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 16:06:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <606d032e-d1f1-257f-eb1c-c471f2f20935@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210225005915.26423-23-andre.przywara@arm.com>

Hi Andre,

On 2/25/21 12:59 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Using the RTC device at its legacy I/O address as set by IBM in 1981
> was a kludge we used for simplicity on ARM platforms as well.
> However this imposes problems due to their missing alignment and overlap
> with the PCI I/O address space.
>
> Now that we can switch a device easily between using ioports and
> MMIO, let's move the RTC out of the first 4K of memory on ARM platforms.
>
> That should be transparent for well behaved guests, since the change is
> naturally reflected in the device tree.

Everything looks correct, compile tested for arm64 and x86-64. Also grep'ed for
0x70 (device ioport address) and DEVICE_BUS_IOPORT, no occurrence in the file
other than in the defines:

Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

Thanks,

Alex

>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
>  arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h |  3 +++
>  hw/rtc.c                          | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h b/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h
> index 633ea8fa..02100c48 100644
> --- a/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h
> +++ b/arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@
>  #define ARM_UART_MMIO_BASE	ARM_MMIO_AREA
>  #define ARM_UART_MMIO_SIZE	0x10000
>  
> +#define ARM_RTC_MMIO_BASE	(ARM_UART_MMIO_BASE + ARM_UART_MMIO_SIZE)
> +#define ARM_RTC_MMIO_SIZE	0x10000
> +
>  #define KVM_FLASH_MMIO_BASE	(ARM_MMIO_AREA + 0x1000000)
>  #define KVM_FLASH_MAX_SIZE	0x1000000
>  
> diff --git a/hw/rtc.c b/hw/rtc.c
> index ee4c9102..aec31c52 100644
> --- a/hw/rtc.c
> +++ b/hw/rtc.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,15 @@
>  
>  #include <time.h>
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> +#define RTC_BUS_TYPE		DEVICE_BUS_MMIO
> +#define RTC_BASE_ADDRESS	ARM_RTC_MMIO_BASE
> +#else
> +/* PORT 0070-007F - CMOS RAM/RTC (REAL TIME CLOCK) */
> +#define RTC_BUS_TYPE		DEVICE_BUS_IOPORT
> +#define RTC_BASE_ADDRESS	0x70
> +#endif
> +
>  /*
>   * MC146818 RTC registers
>   */
> @@ -49,7 +58,7 @@ static void cmos_ram_io(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data,
>  	time_t ti;
>  
>  	if (is_write) {
> -		if (addr == 0x70) {	/* index register */
> +		if (addr == RTC_BASE_ADDRESS) {	/* index register */
>  			u8 value = ioport__read8(data);
>  
>  			vcpu->kvm->nmi_disabled	= value & (1UL << 7);
> @@ -70,7 +79,7 @@ static void cmos_ram_io(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data,
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (addr == 0x70)
> +	if (addr == RTC_BASE_ADDRESS)	/* index register is write-only */
>  		return;
>  
>  	time(&ti);
> @@ -127,7 +136,7 @@ static void generate_rtc_fdt_node(void *fdt,
>  							    u8 irq,
>  							    enum irq_type))
>  {
> -	u64 reg_prop[2] = { cpu_to_fdt64(0x70), cpu_to_fdt64(2) };
> +	u64 reg_prop[2] = { cpu_to_fdt64(RTC_BASE_ADDRESS), cpu_to_fdt64(2) };
>  
>  	_FDT(fdt_begin_node(fdt, "rtc"));
>  	_FDT(fdt_property_string(fdt, "compatible", "motorola,mc146818"));
> @@ -139,7 +148,7 @@ static void generate_rtc_fdt_node(void *fdt,
>  #endif
>  
>  struct device_header rtc_dev_hdr = {
> -	.bus_type = DEVICE_BUS_IOPORT,
> +	.bus_type = RTC_BUS_TYPE,
>  	.data = generate_rtc_fdt_node,
>  };
>  
> @@ -151,8 +160,8 @@ int rtc__init(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	if (r < 0)
>  		return r;
>  
> -	/* PORT 0070-007F - CMOS RAM/RTC (REAL TIME CLOCK) */
> -	r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0070, 2, cmos_ram_io, NULL);
> +	r = kvm__register_iotrap(kvm, RTC_BASE_ADDRESS, 2, cmos_ram_io, NULL,
> +				 RTC_BUS_TYPE);
>  	if (r < 0)
>  		goto out_device;
>  
> @@ -170,8 +179,7 @@ dev_init(rtc__init);
>  
>  int rtc__exit(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
> -	/* PORT 0070-007F - CMOS RAM/RTC (REAL TIME CLOCK) */
> -	kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x0070);
> +	kvm__deregister_iotrap(kvm, RTC_BASE_ADDRESS, RTC_BUS_TYPE);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-09 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-25  0:58 [PATCH kvmtool v2 00/22] Unify I/O port and MMIO trap handling Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58 ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 01/22] ioport: Remove ioport__setup_arch() Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-02 18:02   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-02 18:02     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-25  0:58 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 02/22] hw/serial: Use device abstraction for FDT generator function Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 03/22] ioport: Retire .generate_fdt_node functionality Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 04/22] mmio: Extend handling to include ioport emulation Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-03 17:58   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-03 17:58     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-15 12:24     ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-15 12:24       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 05/22] hw/i8042: Clean up data types Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 06/22] hw/i8042: Refactor trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:58   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-08 17:16   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-08 17:16     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 07/22] hw/i8042: Switch to new trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-08 17:22   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-08 17:22     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 08/22] x86/ioport: Refactor " Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-09 11:49   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-09 11:49     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-15 12:26     ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-15 12:26       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 09/22] x86/ioport: Switch to new " Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-09 12:09   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-09 12:09     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-15 12:26     ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-15 12:26       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 10/22] hw/rtc: Refactor " Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 11/22] hw/rtc: Switch to new trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 12/22] hw/vesa: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 13/22] hw/serial: Refactor trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-12 11:29   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-12 11:29     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-15 12:26     ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-15 12:26       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 14/22] hw/serial: Switch to new trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 15/22] vfio: Refactor ioport trap handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-09 14:21   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-09 14:21     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 16/22] vfio: Switch to new ioport trap handlers Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 17/22] virtio: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-09 14:43   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-09 14:43     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 18/22] pci: " Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 19/22] Remove ioport specific routines Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-09 15:13   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-09 15:13     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 20/22] arm: Reorganise and document memory map Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-09 15:46   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-09 15:46     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-15 12:27     ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-15 12:27       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 21/22] hw/serial: ARM/arm64: Use MMIO at higher addresses Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-09 16:02   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-09 16:02     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-15 12:27     ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-15 12:27       ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 22/22] hw/rtc: " Andre Przywara
2021-02-25  0:59   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-09 16:06   ` Alexandru Elisei [this message]
2021-03-09 16:06     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-02 17:57 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 00/22] Unify I/O port and MMIO trap handling Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-02 17:57   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-03 18:41   ` Andre Przywara
2021-03-03 18:41     ` Andre Przywara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=606d032e-d1f1-257f-eb1c-c471f2f20935@arm.com \
    --to=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=sami.mujawar@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.