All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: anshuman.khandual@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 13/17] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_AA64MMFR1 register
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 14:44:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ad2dde0-455f-90a6-7b76-eda4fe8d6efe@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1589881254-10082-14-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

On 05/19/2020 10:40 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Enable ETS, TWED, XNX and SPECSEI features bits in ID_AA64MMFR1 register as
> per ARM DDI 0487F.a specification.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> 
> Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 4 ++++
>   arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c  | 4 ++++
>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 95fdfc5e9bd0..f9dd2c5ab074 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -734,6 +734,10 @@
>   #endif
>   
>   /* id_aa64mmfr1 */
> +#define ID_AA64MMFR1_ETS_SHIFT		36
> +#define ID_AA64MMFR1_TWED_SHIFT		32
> +#define ID_AA64MMFR1_XNX_SHIFT		28
> +#define ID_AA64MMFR1_SPECSEI_SHIFT	24
>   #define ID_AA64MMFR1_PAN_SHIFT		20
>   #define ID_AA64MMFR1_LOR_SHIFT		16
>   #define ID_AA64MMFR1_HPD_SHIFT		12
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 7ce19f97ba73..1f10ff7df705 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -299,6 +299,10 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64mmfr0[] = {
>   };
>   
>   static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64mmfr1[] = {
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR1_ETS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR1_TWED_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR1_XNX_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR1_SPECSEI_SHIFT, 4, 0),

SpecSEI must be HIGHER_SAFE, like we did for MMFR4 ?

Otherwise looks good to me.

Suzuki

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: anshuman.khandual@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 13/17] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_AA64MMFR1 register
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 14:44:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ad2dde0-455f-90a6-7b76-eda4fe8d6efe@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1589881254-10082-14-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

On 05/19/2020 10:40 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Enable ETS, TWED, XNX and SPECSEI features bits in ID_AA64MMFR1 register as
> per ARM DDI 0487F.a specification.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> 
> Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 4 ++++
>   arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c  | 4 ++++
>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 95fdfc5e9bd0..f9dd2c5ab074 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -734,6 +734,10 @@
>   #endif
>   
>   /* id_aa64mmfr1 */
> +#define ID_AA64MMFR1_ETS_SHIFT		36
> +#define ID_AA64MMFR1_TWED_SHIFT		32
> +#define ID_AA64MMFR1_XNX_SHIFT		28
> +#define ID_AA64MMFR1_SPECSEI_SHIFT	24
>   #define ID_AA64MMFR1_PAN_SHIFT		20
>   #define ID_AA64MMFR1_LOR_SHIFT		16
>   #define ID_AA64MMFR1_HPD_SHIFT		12
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 7ce19f97ba73..1f10ff7df705 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -299,6 +299,10 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64mmfr0[] = {
>   };
>   
>   static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64mmfr1[] = {
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR1_ETS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR1_TWED_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR1_XNX_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR1_SPECSEI_SHIFT, 4, 0),

SpecSEI must be HIGHER_SAFE, like we did for MMFR4 ?

Otherwise looks good to me.

Suzuki

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-19 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-19  9:40 [PATCH V4 00/17] arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_PFR2, ID_DFR1, ID_MMFR5 and other changes Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH V4 01/17] arm64/cpufeature: Add explicit ftr_id_isar0[] for ID_ISAR0 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH V4 02/17] arm64/cpufeature: Drop TraceFilt feature exposure from ID_DFR0 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH V4 03/17] arm64/cpufeature: Make doublelock a signed feature in ID_AA64DFR0 Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19 10:44   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19 10:44     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH V4 04/17] arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_PFR2 CPU register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH V4 05/17] arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_DFR1 " Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19 10:46   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19 10:46     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19 10:46     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH V4 06/17] arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_MMFR5 " Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19 10:50   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19 10:50     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19 10:50     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH V4 07/17] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_PFR0 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH V4 08/17] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_MMFR4 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19 10:53   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19 10:53     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH V4 09/17] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_AA64ISAR0 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19 10:56   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19 10:56     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH V4 10/17] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_AA64PFR0 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19 11:11   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19 11:11     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH V4 11/17] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_AA64PFR1 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19 11:13   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19 11:13     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH V4 12/17] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_AA64MMFR0 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19 13:32   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19 13:32     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-24 23:08     ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-24 23:08       ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH V4 13/17] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_AA64MMFR1 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19 13:44   ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2020-05-19 13:44     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-24  1:09     ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-24  1:09       ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH V4 14/17] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_AA64MMFR2 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-20 13:56   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-20 13:56     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH V4 15/17] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_AA64DFR0 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-20 13:57   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-20 13:57     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-24  1:08     ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-24  1:08       ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-25 10:46       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-25 10:46         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH V4 16/17] arm64/cpufeature: Replace all open bits shift encodings with macros Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40 ` [PATCH V4 17/17] arm64/cpuinfo: Add ID_MMFR4_EL1 into the cpuinfo_arm64 context Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-19  9:40   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-20 13:58   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-20 13:58     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-21 15:19 ` [PATCH V4 00/17] arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_PFR2, ID_DFR1, ID_MMFR5 and other changes Will Deacon
2020-05-21 15:19   ` Will Deacon
2020-05-21 15:19   ` Will Deacon
2020-05-25 12:39   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-25 12:39     ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-25 12:39     ` Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6ad2dde0-455f-90a6-7b76-eda4fe8d6efe@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.