All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <kbusch@kernel.org>, <axboe@fb.com>, <hch@lst.de>,
	<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] nvme-rdma: avoid IO error for nvme native multipath
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 11:37:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b01cd8e-a153-1913-4e2f-0c3ce1029ccf@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1651456a-3251-77db-42c9-fc1a2d2c5c13@grimberg.me>



On 2021/1/29 11:24, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> 
>>>>> Why not just call set the status and call nvme_rdma_complete_rq and
>>>>> return here?
>>>> If the err is ENOMEM or EAGAIN, I am not sure the err must be a
>>>> path-related error for all HBA drivers. So reused the error check code.
>>>> I think it would be more reasonable to assume any errors returned by HBA
>>>> driver as path-related errors.
>>>> If you think so, I will modify it in next patch version.
>>>
>>> Meant to do that only for -EIO. We should absolutely not do any of this
>>> for stuff like EINVAL, EOPNOTSUPP, EPERM or any strange error that may
>>> return due to a bug or anything like that.
>> ok, please review again, thank you.
>> ---
>>   drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c | 9 +++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
>> index b7ce4f221d99..66b697461bd9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
>> @@ -2084,8 +2084,13 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_rdma_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>>
>>          err = nvme_rdma_post_send(queue, sqe, req->sge, req->num_sge,
>>                          req->mr ? &req->reg_wr.wr : NULL);
>> -       if (unlikely(err))
>> +       if (unlikely(err)) {
>> +               if (err == -EIO) {
>> +                       nvme_complete_failed_rq(rq, NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR);
> 
> I was thinking about:
> -- 
>          err = nvme_rdma_post_send(queue, sqe, req->sge, req->num_sge,
>                          req->mr ? &req->reg_wr.wr : NULL);
>          if (unlikely(err)) {
>                  if (err == -EIO) {
>                          /*
>                           * Fail the reuqest so upper layer can failover I/O
>                           * if another path is available
>                           */
>                          req->status = NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR;
>                          nvme_rdma_complete_rq(rq);
>                          return BLK_STS_OK;
Need to do clean. so can not directly return.
> 
>                  }
>                  goto err_unmap;
>          }
> -- 
> .

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: kbusch@kernel.org, axboe@fb.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] nvme-rdma: avoid IO error for nvme native multipath
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 11:37:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b01cd8e-a153-1913-4e2f-0c3ce1029ccf@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1651456a-3251-77db-42c9-fc1a2d2c5c13@grimberg.me>



On 2021/1/29 11:24, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> 
>>>>> Why not just call set the status and call nvme_rdma_complete_rq and
>>>>> return here?
>>>> If the err is ENOMEM or EAGAIN, I am not sure the err must be a
>>>> path-related error for all HBA drivers. So reused the error check code.
>>>> I think it would be more reasonable to assume any errors returned by HBA
>>>> driver as path-related errors.
>>>> If you think so, I will modify it in next patch version.
>>>
>>> Meant to do that only for -EIO. We should absolutely not do any of this
>>> for stuff like EINVAL, EOPNOTSUPP, EPERM or any strange error that may
>>> return due to a bug or anything like that.
>> ok, please review again, thank you.
>> ---
>>   drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c | 9 +++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
>> index b7ce4f221d99..66b697461bd9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
>> @@ -2084,8 +2084,13 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_rdma_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>>
>>          err = nvme_rdma_post_send(queue, sqe, req->sge, req->num_sge,
>>                          req->mr ? &req->reg_wr.wr : NULL);
>> -       if (unlikely(err))
>> +       if (unlikely(err)) {
>> +               if (err == -EIO) {
>> +                       nvme_complete_failed_rq(rq, NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR);
> 
> I was thinking about:
> -- 
>          err = nvme_rdma_post_send(queue, sqe, req->sge, req->num_sge,
>                          req->mr ? &req->reg_wr.wr : NULL);
>          if (unlikely(err)) {
>                  if (err == -EIO) {
>                          /*
>                           * Fail the reuqest so upper layer can failover I/O
>                           * if another path is available
>                           */
>                          req->status = NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR;
>                          nvme_rdma_complete_rq(rq);
>                          return BLK_STS_OK;
Need to do clean. so can not directly return.
> 
>                  }
>                  goto err_unmap;
>          }
> -- 
> .

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-29  3:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-26  8:15 [PATCH v4 0/5] avoid double request completion and IO error Chao Leng
2021-01-26  8:15 ` Chao Leng
2021-01-26  8:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_set_request_complete Chao Leng
2021-01-26  8:15   ` Chao Leng
2021-01-27 16:40   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-27 16:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28  1:34     ` Chao Leng
2021-01-28  1:34       ` Chao Leng
2021-01-26  8:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] nvme-core: introduce complete failed request Chao Leng
2021-01-26  8:15   ` Chao Leng
2021-01-26  8:15 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] nvme-fabrics: avoid double request completion for nvmf_fail_nonready_command Chao Leng
2021-01-26  8:15   ` Chao Leng
2021-01-26  8:15 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] nvme-rdma: avoid IO error for nvme native multipath Chao Leng
2021-01-26  8:15   ` Chao Leng
2021-01-28  8:39   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-01-28  8:39     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-01-28  9:31     ` Chao Leng
2021-01-28  9:31       ` Chao Leng
2021-01-29  1:35       ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-01-29  1:35         ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-01-29  2:48         ` Chao Leng
2021-01-29  2:48           ` Chao Leng
2021-01-29  3:24           ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-01-29  3:24             ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-01-29  3:30             ` Chao Leng
2021-01-29  3:30               ` Chao Leng
2021-01-29  3:37               ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-01-29  3:37                 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-01-29  3:50                 ` Chao Leng
2021-01-29  3:50                   ` Chao Leng
2021-01-29  3:37             ` Chao Leng [this message]
2021-01-29  3:37               ` Chao Leng
2021-01-26  8:15 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] nvme-fc: " Chao Leng
2021-01-26  8:15   ` Chao Leng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6b01cd8e-a153-1913-4e2f-0c3ce1029ccf@huawei.com \
    --to=lengchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.