All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	<rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <lenb@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	<lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] arm64: SPE ACPI enablement
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 16:36:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7215e7f2-b8d3-999e-427b-428282765276@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190615010910.33921-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com>

On 2019/6/15 9:09, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> This patch series enables the Arm Statistical Profiling
> Extension (SPE) on ACPI platforms.
> 
> This is possible because ACPI 6.3 uses a previously
> reserved field in the MADT to store the SPE interrupt
> number, similarly to how the normal PMU is described.
> If a consistent valid interrupt exists across all the
> cores in the system, a platform device is registered.
> That then triggers the SPE module, which runs as normal.
> 
> We also add the ability to parse the PPTT for IDENTICAL
> cores. We then use this to sanity check the single SPE
> device we create. This creates a bit of a problem with
> respect to the specification though. The specification
> says that its legal for multiple tree's to exist in the
> PPTT. We handle this fine, but what happens in the
> case of multiple tree's is that the lack of a common
> node with IDENTICAL set forces us to assume that there
> are multiple non-IDENTICAL cores in the machine.
> 
> v3->v4: Rebase to 5.2.
> 	Minor formatting, patch rearrangement.
> 	Add missing `inline` in static header definition.
> 	Drop ARM_SPE_ACPI and just use ARM_SPE_PMU.

Tested on top of 5.2-rc1, I can see in the boot log:

arm_spe_pmu arm,spe-v1: probed for CPUs 0-95 [max_record_sz 128, align 4, features 0x7]

and I also tested perf record, and works as expected,

Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>

Thanks
Hanjun


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, lenb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] arm64: SPE ACPI enablement
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 16:36:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7215e7f2-b8d3-999e-427b-428282765276@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190615010910.33921-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com>

On 2019/6/15 9:09, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> This patch series enables the Arm Statistical Profiling
> Extension (SPE) on ACPI platforms.
> 
> This is possible because ACPI 6.3 uses a previously
> reserved field in the MADT to store the SPE interrupt
> number, similarly to how the normal PMU is described.
> If a consistent valid interrupt exists across all the
> cores in the system, a platform device is registered.
> That then triggers the SPE module, which runs as normal.
> 
> We also add the ability to parse the PPTT for IDENTICAL
> cores. We then use this to sanity check the single SPE
> device we create. This creates a bit of a problem with
> respect to the specification though. The specification
> says that its legal for multiple tree's to exist in the
> PPTT. We handle this fine, but what happens in the
> case of multiple tree's is that the lack of a common
> node with IDENTICAL set forces us to assume that there
> are multiple non-IDENTICAL cores in the machine.
> 
> v3->v4: Rebase to 5.2.
> 	Minor formatting, patch rearrangement.
> 	Add missing `inline` in static header definition.
> 	Drop ARM_SPE_ACPI and just use ARM_SPE_PMU.

Tested on top of 5.2-rc1, I can see in the boot log:

arm_spe_pmu arm,spe-v1: probed for CPUs 0-95 [max_record_sz 128, align 4, features 0x7]

and I also tested perf record, and works as expected,

Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>

Thanks
Hanjun


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-17  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-15  1:09 [PATCH v4 0/4] arm64: SPE ACPI enablement Jeremy Linton
2019-06-15  1:09 ` Jeremy Linton
2019-06-15  1:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI/PPTT: Modify node flag detection to find last IDENTICAL Jeremy Linton
2019-06-15  1:09   ` Jeremy Linton
2019-06-15  1:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI/PPTT: Add function to return ACPI 6.3 Identical tokens Jeremy Linton
2019-06-15  1:09   ` Jeremy Linton
2019-06-15  1:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm_pmu: acpi: spe: Add initial MADT/SPE probing Jeremy Linton
2019-06-15  1:09   ` Jeremy Linton
2019-06-18 17:05   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-06-18 17:05     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-06-18 17:36   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-06-18 17:36     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-06-18 18:37     ` Jeremy Linton
2019-06-18 18:37       ` Jeremy Linton
2019-06-15  1:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf: arm_spe: Enable ACPI/Platform automatic module loading Jeremy Linton
2019-06-15  1:09   ` Jeremy Linton
2019-06-17  8:36 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2019-06-17  8:36   ` [PATCH v4 0/4] arm64: SPE ACPI enablement Hanjun Guo
2019-06-18 16:42 ` Will Deacon
2019-06-18 16:42   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7215e7f2-b8d3-999e-427b-428282765276@huawei.com \
    --to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.