All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, youlin.pei@mediatek.com,
	anan.sun@mediatek.com, lc.kan@mediatek.com, yi.kuo@mediatek.com,
	anthony.huang@mediatek.com,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] memory: mtk-smi: Fix the return value for clk_bulk_prepare_enable
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 13:01:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7370f18b-e273-69f2-1cc9-a42495e04874@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220113111057.29918-6-yong.wu@mediatek.com>

On 13/01/2022 12:10, Yong Wu wrote:
> Function clk_bulk_prepare_enable() returns 0 for success or a negative
> number for error. Fix this code style issue.

The message does not really make sense. If negative is returned, then
the check (ret < 0) was correct.

I guess you wanted to say that common code style is to check for any
non-zero return value, just like it's implementation in clk.h does.

I'll adjust the commit msg when applying.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> index b883dcc0bbfa..e7b1a22b12ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_smi_larb_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(larb->smi.clk_num, larb->smi.clks);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> +	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	/* Configure the basic setting for this larb */
> 


Best regards,
Krzysztof

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: youlin.pei@mediatek.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	yi.kuo@mediatek.com, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, lc.kan@mediatek.com,
	anthony.huang@mediatek.com, anan.sun@mediatek.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] memory: mtk-smi: Fix the return value for clk_bulk_prepare_enable
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 13:01:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7370f18b-e273-69f2-1cc9-a42495e04874@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220113111057.29918-6-yong.wu@mediatek.com>

On 13/01/2022 12:10, Yong Wu wrote:
> Function clk_bulk_prepare_enable() returns 0 for success or a negative
> number for error. Fix this code style issue.

The message does not really make sense. If negative is returned, then
the check (ret < 0) was correct.

I guess you wanted to say that common code style is to check for any
non-zero return value, just like it's implementation in clk.h does.

I'll adjust the commit msg when applying.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> index b883dcc0bbfa..e7b1a22b12ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_smi_larb_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(larb->smi.clk_num, larb->smi.clks);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> +	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	/* Configure the basic setting for this larb */
> 


Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, youlin.pei@mediatek.com,
	anan.sun@mediatek.com, lc.kan@mediatek.com, yi.kuo@mediatek.com,
	anthony.huang@mediatek.com,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] memory: mtk-smi: Fix the return value for clk_bulk_prepare_enable
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 13:01:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7370f18b-e273-69f2-1cc9-a42495e04874@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220113111057.29918-6-yong.wu@mediatek.com>

On 13/01/2022 12:10, Yong Wu wrote:
> Function clk_bulk_prepare_enable() returns 0 for success or a negative
> number for error. Fix this code style issue.

The message does not really make sense. If negative is returned, then
the check (ret < 0) was correct.

I guess you wanted to say that common code style is to check for any
non-zero return value, just like it's implementation in clk.h does.

I'll adjust the commit msg when applying.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> index b883dcc0bbfa..e7b1a22b12ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_smi_larb_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(larb->smi.clk_num, larb->smi.clks);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> +	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	/* Configure the basic setting for this larb */
> 


Best regards,
Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, youlin.pei@mediatek.com,
	anan.sun@mediatek.com, lc.kan@mediatek.com, yi.kuo@mediatek.com,
	anthony.huang@mediatek.com,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] memory: mtk-smi: Fix the return value for clk_bulk_prepare_enable
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 13:01:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7370f18b-e273-69f2-1cc9-a42495e04874@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220113111057.29918-6-yong.wu@mediatek.com>

On 13/01/2022 12:10, Yong Wu wrote:
> Function clk_bulk_prepare_enable() returns 0 for success or a negative
> number for error. Fix this code style issue.

The message does not really make sense. If negative is returned, then
the check (ret < 0) was correct.

I guess you wanted to say that common code style is to check for any
non-zero return value, just like it's implementation in clk.h does.

I'll adjust the commit msg when applying.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> index b883dcc0bbfa..e7b1a22b12ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_smi_larb_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(larb->smi.clk_num, larb->smi.clks);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> +	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	/* Configure the basic setting for this larb */
> 


Best regards,
Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-17 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-13 11:10 [PATCH v3 0/7] MT8186 SMI SUPPORT Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10 ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10 ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10 ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] dt-bindings: memory: mtk-smi: Rename clock to clocks Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 15:41   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-13 15:41     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-13 15:41     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-13 15:41     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-13 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] dt-bindings: memory: mtk-smi: No need mediatek,larb-id for mt8167 Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` [PATCH v3 2/7] dt-bindings: memory: mtk-smi: No need mediatek, larb-id " Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 15:44   ` [PATCH v3 2/7] dt-bindings: memory: mtk-smi: No need mediatek,larb-id " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-13 15:44     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-13 15:44     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-13 15:44     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-13 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] dt-bindings: memory: mtk-smi: Correct minItems to 2 for the gals clocks Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 15:44   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-13 15:44     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-13 15:44     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-13 15:44     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-13 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] dt-bindings: memory: mediatek: Add mt8186 support Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 15:44   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-13 15:44     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-13 15:44     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-13 15:44     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-13 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] memory: mtk-smi: Fix the return value for clk_bulk_prepare_enable Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-17 12:01   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2022-01-17 12:01     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-01-17 12:01     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-01-17 12:01     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-01-17 12:25     ` Yong Wu
2022-01-17 12:25       ` Yong Wu
2022-01-17 12:25       ` Yong Wu
2022-01-17 12:25       ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] memory: mtk-smi: Add sleep ctrl function Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] memory: mtk-smi: mt8186: Add smi support Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-13 11:10   ` Yong Wu
2022-01-25 16:55 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] MT8186 SMI SUPPORT Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-01-25 16:55   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-01-25 16:55   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-01-25 16:55   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7370f18b-e273-69f2-1cc9-a42495e04874@canonical.com \
    --to=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
    --cc=anan.sun@mediatek.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=anthony.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=lc.kan@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=yi.kuo@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.