From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
"Julien Thierry" <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
"Suzuki K Pouloze" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] arm/arm64: Provide a wrapper for SMCCC 1.1 calls
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:05:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <760679a0a6fef6041b0e7bec8d04d81f@www.loen.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <890a7909-1083-2e6d-368a-f1d03788f5a1@arm.com>
On 2019-10-21 14:43, Steven Price wrote:
> On 21/10/2019 12:42, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 2019-10-11 13:59, Steven Price wrote:
> [...]
>> All this should most probably go on top of the SMCCC conduit cleanup
>> that
>> has already been already queued in the arm64 tree (see
>> arm64/for-next/smccc-conduit-cleanup).
>
> Good point, I'll rebase. Are you happy for the entire series to be
> based
> on top of that? i.e. based on commit e6ea46511b1a ("firmware:
> arm_sdei:
> use common SMCCC_CONDUIT_*")
Absolutely. I'll sync with Will and Catalin to get a stable branch that
includes these commits.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] arm/arm64: Provide a wrapper for SMCCC 1.1 calls
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:05:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <760679a0a6fef6041b0e7bec8d04d81f@www.loen.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <890a7909-1083-2e6d-368a-f1d03788f5a1@arm.com>
On 2019-10-21 14:43, Steven Price wrote:
> On 21/10/2019 12:42, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 2019-10-11 13:59, Steven Price wrote:
> [...]
>> All this should most probably go on top of the SMCCC conduit cleanup
>> that
>> has already been already queued in the arm64 tree (see
>> arm64/for-next/smccc-conduit-cleanup).
>
> Good point, I'll rebase. Are you happy for the entire series to be
> based
> on top of that? i.e. based on commit e6ea46511b1a ("firmware:
> arm_sdei:
> use common SMCCC_CONDUIT_*")
Absolutely. I'll sync with Will and Catalin to get a stable branch that
includes these commits.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Suzuki K Pouloze" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, "Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
"Julien Thierry" <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] arm/arm64: Provide a wrapper for SMCCC 1.1 calls
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:05:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <760679a0a6fef6041b0e7bec8d04d81f@www.loen.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <890a7909-1083-2e6d-368a-f1d03788f5a1@arm.com>
On 2019-10-21 14:43, Steven Price wrote:
> On 21/10/2019 12:42, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 2019-10-11 13:59, Steven Price wrote:
> [...]
>> All this should most probably go on top of the SMCCC conduit cleanup
>> that
>> has already been already queued in the arm64 tree (see
>> arm64/for-next/smccc-conduit-cleanup).
>
> Good point, I'll rebase. Are you happy for the entire series to be
> based
> on top of that? i.e. based on commit e6ea46511b1a ("firmware:
> arm_sdei:
> use common SMCCC_CONDUIT_*")
Absolutely. I'll sync with Will and Catalin to get a stable branch that
includes these commits.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-21 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-11 12:59 [PATCH v6 00/10] arm64: Stolen time support Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] KVM: arm64: Document PV-time interface Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-15 17:56 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-17 9:40 ` Steven Price
2019-10-18 17:10 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-21 13:40 ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 14:38 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Factor out hypercall handling from PSCI code Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] KVM: arm64: Implement PV_TIME_FEATURES call Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] KVM: Implement kvm_put_guest() Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] KVM: arm64: Support stolen time reporting via shared structure Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-19 11:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-19 11:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-19 11:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 10:21 ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 10:21 ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 10:21 ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 10:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 10:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 10:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 11:24 ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 11:24 ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 11:24 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] KVM: Allow kvm_device_ops to be const Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] KVM: arm64: Provide VCPU attributes for stolen time Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-19 11:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-19 11:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-19 11:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 11:00 ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 11:00 ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 11:00 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] arm/arm64: Provide a wrapper for SMCCC 1.1 calls Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 11:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 11:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 11:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 13:43 ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 13:43 ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 13:43 ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 14:05 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2019-10-21 14:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 14:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] arm/arm64: Make use of the SMCCC 1.1 wrapper Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] arm64: Retrieve stolen time as paravirtualized guest Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` Steven Price
2019-10-19 20:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-19 20:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-19 20:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 5:01 ` Jürgen Groß
2019-10-21 5:01 ` Jürgen Groß
2019-10-21 5:01 ` Jürgen Groß
2019-10-21 7:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 7:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 7:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 12:14 ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 12:14 ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 12:14 ` Steven Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=760679a0a6fef6041b0e7bec8d04d81f@www.loen.fr \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.