Re: [PATCH -next] spi: at91-usart: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() to simplify code

From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Radu Pirea <radu_nicolae.pirea@upb.ro>,
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] spi: at91-usart: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() to simplify code
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 16:04:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <78d84425-a8ac-42a4-946f-9906a7a4e875@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230822144555d15b0dcd@mail.local>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 628 bytes --]

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 04:45:55PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 22/08/2023 15:15:13+0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I tend to go on the basis that for this sort of thing that's recognised
> > by pattern matching other people will end up sending versions of it no
> > matter what.

> And I'd love for people to explicitly write this has been automatically
> generated in their commit log so we know that probably no though has
> been given to the patch.

Well, a bunch of them are going to be manually written by someone based
on fixing warnings that some checker is generating rather than actually
automatically generated.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]