All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
To: "linux-phy@lists.infradead.org" <linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>,
	"vkoul@kernel.org" <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: "hongxing.zhu@nxp.com" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
	"linux-imx@nxp.com" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"kishon@kernel.org" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"heiko@sntech.de" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"l.stach@pengutronix.de" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com" <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com" <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"tharvey@gateworks.com" <tharvey@gateworks.com>,
	"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
	"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] phy: freescale: imx8m-pcie: fix pcie link-up instability
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 22:23:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ba92b06aecb4d8894ba9ec8f92376bd971d2a72.camel@toradex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <171239512402.352254.17030670986383011631.b4-ty@kernel.org>

Hi Vinod

On Sat, 2024-04-06 at 14:48 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:19:37 +0100, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> > On the i.MX 8M Mini, the AUX_PLL_REFCLK_SEL has to be left at its reset
> > default of AUX_IN (PLL clock).
> > 
> > Background Information:
> > In our automated testing setup, we use Delock Mini-PCIe SATA cards [1].
> > While this setup has proven very stable overall we noticed upstream on
> > the i.MX 8M Mini fails quite regularly (about 50/50) to bring up the
> > PCIe link while with NXP's downstream BSP 5.15.71_2.2.2 it always works.
> > As that old downstream stuff was quite different, I first also tried
> > NXP's latest downstream BSP 6.1.55_2.2.0 which from a PCIe point of view
> > is fairly vanilla, however, also there the PCIe link-up was not stable.
> > Comparing and debugging I noticed that upstream explicitly configures
> > the AUX_PLL_REFCLK_SEL to I_PLL_REFCLK_FROM_SYSPLL while working
> > downstream [2] leaving it at reset defaults of AUX_IN (PLL clock).
> > Unfortunately, the TRM does not mention any further details about this
> > register (both for the i.MX 8M Mini as well as the Plus).
> > NXP confirmed their validation codes for the i.MX8MM PCIe doesn't
> > configure cmn_reg063 (offset: 0x18C).
> > BTW: On the i.MX 8M Plus we have not seen any issues with PCIe with the
> > exact same setup which is why I left it unchanged.
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 
> [1/1] phy: freescale: imx8m-pcie: fix pcie link-up instability
>       commit: 3a161017f1de55cc48be81f6156004c151f32677

Sorry, but it is slightly confusing whether v1 or v2 now got applied. I believe v1 but then only the commit
messages differ. However, please note that only v2 included information on how to proceed concerning
backporting to stable 6.1.x.

Thanks!

> Best regards,
> --
> -Vinod

Cheers

Marcel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
To: "linux-phy@lists.infradead.org" <linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>,
	"vkoul@kernel.org" <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: "hongxing.zhu@nxp.com" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
	"linux-imx@nxp.com" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"kishon@kernel.org" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"heiko@sntech.de" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"l.stach@pengutronix.de" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com" <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com" <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"tharvey@gateworks.com" <tharvey@gateworks.com>,
	"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
	"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] phy: freescale: imx8m-pcie: fix pcie link-up instability
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 22:23:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ba92b06aecb4d8894ba9ec8f92376bd971d2a72.camel@toradex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <171239512402.352254.17030670986383011631.b4-ty@kernel.org>

Hi Vinod

On Sat, 2024-04-06 at 14:48 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:19:37 +0100, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> > On the i.MX 8M Mini, the AUX_PLL_REFCLK_SEL has to be left at its reset
> > default of AUX_IN (PLL clock).
> > 
> > Background Information:
> > In our automated testing setup, we use Delock Mini-PCIe SATA cards [1].
> > While this setup has proven very stable overall we noticed upstream on
> > the i.MX 8M Mini fails quite regularly (about 50/50) to bring up the
> > PCIe link while with NXP's downstream BSP 5.15.71_2.2.2 it always works.
> > As that old downstream stuff was quite different, I first also tried
> > NXP's latest downstream BSP 6.1.55_2.2.0 which from a PCIe point of view
> > is fairly vanilla, however, also there the PCIe link-up was not stable.
> > Comparing and debugging I noticed that upstream explicitly configures
> > the AUX_PLL_REFCLK_SEL to I_PLL_REFCLK_FROM_SYSPLL while working
> > downstream [2] leaving it at reset defaults of AUX_IN (PLL clock).
> > Unfortunately, the TRM does not mention any further details about this
> > register (both for the i.MX 8M Mini as well as the Plus).
> > NXP confirmed their validation codes for the i.MX8MM PCIe doesn't
> > configure cmn_reg063 (offset: 0x18C).
> > BTW: On the i.MX 8M Plus we have not seen any issues with PCIe with the
> > exact same setup which is why I left it unchanged.
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 
> [1/1] phy: freescale: imx8m-pcie: fix pcie link-up instability
>       commit: 3a161017f1de55cc48be81f6156004c151f32677

Sorry, but it is slightly confusing whether v1 or v2 now got applied. I believe v1 but then only the commit
messages differ. However, please note that only v2 included information on how to proceed concerning
backporting to stable 6.1.x.

Thanks!

> Best regards,
> --
> -Vinod

Cheers

Marcel
-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
To: "linux-phy@lists.infradead.org" <linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>,
	"vkoul@kernel.org" <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: "hongxing.zhu@nxp.com" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
	"linux-imx@nxp.com" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"kishon@kernel.org" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"heiko@sntech.de" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"l.stach@pengutronix.de" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com" <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com" <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"tharvey@gateworks.com" <tharvey@gateworks.com>,
	"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
	"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] phy: freescale: imx8m-pcie: fix pcie link-up instability
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 22:23:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ba92b06aecb4d8894ba9ec8f92376bd971d2a72.camel@toradex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <171239512402.352254.17030670986383011631.b4-ty@kernel.org>

Hi Vinod

On Sat, 2024-04-06 at 14:48 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:19:37 +0100, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> > On the i.MX 8M Mini, the AUX_PLL_REFCLK_SEL has to be left at its reset
> > default of AUX_IN (PLL clock).
> > 
> > Background Information:
> > In our automated testing setup, we use Delock Mini-PCIe SATA cards [1].
> > While this setup has proven very stable overall we noticed upstream on
> > the i.MX 8M Mini fails quite regularly (about 50/50) to bring up the
> > PCIe link while with NXP's downstream BSP 5.15.71_2.2.2 it always works.
> > As that old downstream stuff was quite different, I first also tried
> > NXP's latest downstream BSP 6.1.55_2.2.0 which from a PCIe point of view
> > is fairly vanilla, however, also there the PCIe link-up was not stable.
> > Comparing and debugging I noticed that upstream explicitly configures
> > the AUX_PLL_REFCLK_SEL to I_PLL_REFCLK_FROM_SYSPLL while working
> > downstream [2] leaving it at reset defaults of AUX_IN (PLL clock).
> > Unfortunately, the TRM does not mention any further details about this
> > register (both for the i.MX 8M Mini as well as the Plus).
> > NXP confirmed their validation codes for the i.MX8MM PCIe doesn't
> > configure cmn_reg063 (offset: 0x18C).
> > BTW: On the i.MX 8M Plus we have not seen any issues with PCIe with the
> > exact same setup which is why I left it unchanged.
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 
> [1/1] phy: freescale: imx8m-pcie: fix pcie link-up instability
>       commit: 3a161017f1de55cc48be81f6156004c151f32677

Sorry, but it is slightly confusing whether v1 or v2 now got applied. I believe v1 but then only the commit
messages differ. However, please note that only v2 included information on how to proceed concerning
backporting to stable 6.1.x.

Thanks!

> Best regards,
> --
> -Vinod

Cheers

Marcel
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-07 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-27  7:19 [PATCH v2] phy: freescale: imx8m-pcie: fix pcie link-up instability Marcel Ziswiler
2024-03-27  7:19 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2024-03-27  7:19 ` Marcel Ziswiler
2024-04-06  7:18 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-06  7:18   ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-06  7:18   ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-06  9:18 ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-06  9:18   ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-06  9:18   ` Vinod Koul
2024-04-07 22:23   ` Marcel Ziswiler [this message]
2024-04-07 22:23     ` Marcel Ziswiler
2024-04-07 22:23     ` Marcel Ziswiler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7ba92b06aecb4d8894ba9ec8f92376bd971d2a72.camel@toradex.com \
    --to=marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tharvey@gateworks.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.