All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] SoC changes for 5.17
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 09:11:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e480da8-0d54-2d62-0a8e-184901c974b6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a0RDZpLtWjMEU1QVWSjOoqRAH6QxQ+ZQnJc8LwaV7m+JQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Arnd, Olof,

On 12/23/2021 13:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I'm sending out the pull requests for 5.17 early, as I won't have access to
> my workstation for the next two weeks. With only 760 non-merge commits,
> this again feels quieter than the massive previous merge window, but the
> number of changed lines was actually slightly higher.
> 
> There are very few changes aside from devicetree patches, most of
> which are for the i.MX, Tegra, Qualcomm, Apple, K3 and Aspeed
> platforms.
> 
> We have a couple of new SoCs in existing families:
> 
>   - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1
>   - Qualcomm Snapdragon SDX65
>   - NXP i.MX8ULP
>   - Texas Instruments j721s2
>   - Renesas R-Car S4-8
> 
> The time between product announcement and kernel support is fairly short
> for all of these, which is nice. In particular the two Snapdragons were only
> announced this month and are the current high end of Qualcomm's products.
> On the other end of the spectrum, we also add support for ST SPEAr320s,
> which was launched 10 years ago.
> 
> Aside from the Arm chips, there is also a pull request for a new RISC-V SoC,
> the Starfive JH7100, including some of the basic drivers to make it boot.

There seems to half of the submitted Broadcom SoCs pull request missing 
in this one, was there issues with those below:

defconfigs:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20211221220642.2862218-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20211221220642.2862218-2-f.fainelli@gmail.com/

drivers:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20211221220642.2862218-5-f.fainelli@gmail.com/

Should I resend or fix something in those? Thanks!

Happy holidays!
-- 
Florian

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] SoC changes for 5.17
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 09:11:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e480da8-0d54-2d62-0a8e-184901c974b6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a0RDZpLtWjMEU1QVWSjOoqRAH6QxQ+ZQnJc8LwaV7m+JQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Arnd, Olof,

On 12/23/2021 13:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I'm sending out the pull requests for 5.17 early, as I won't have access to
> my workstation for the next two weeks. With only 760 non-merge commits,
> this again feels quieter than the massive previous merge window, but the
> number of changed lines was actually slightly higher.
> 
> There are very few changes aside from devicetree patches, most of
> which are for the i.MX, Tegra, Qualcomm, Apple, K3 and Aspeed
> platforms.
> 
> We have a couple of new SoCs in existing families:
> 
>   - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1
>   - Qualcomm Snapdragon SDX65
>   - NXP i.MX8ULP
>   - Texas Instruments j721s2
>   - Renesas R-Car S4-8
> 
> The time between product announcement and kernel support is fairly short
> for all of these, which is nice. In particular the two Snapdragons were only
> announced this month and are the current high end of Qualcomm's products.
> On the other end of the spectrum, we also add support for ST SPEAr320s,
> which was launched 10 years ago.
> 
> Aside from the Arm chips, there is also a pull request for a new RISC-V SoC,
> the Starfive JH7100, including some of the basic drivers to make it boot.

There seems to half of the submitted Broadcom SoCs pull request missing 
in this one, was there issues with those below:

defconfigs:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20211221220642.2862218-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20211221220642.2862218-2-f.fainelli@gmail.com/

drivers:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20211221220642.2862218-5-f.fainelli@gmail.com/

Should I resend or fix something in those? Thanks!

Happy holidays!
-- 
Florian

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-24 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-23 21:31 [GIT PULL 0/5] SoC changes for 5.17 Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-23 21:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-23 21:32 ` [GIT PULL 1/5] ARM: SoC updates for v5.17 Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-23 21:32   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-01-10 18:28   ` pr-tracker-bot
2022-01-10 18:28     ` pr-tracker-bot
2021-12-23 21:33 ` [GIT PULL 2/5] ARM: defconfig updates for 5.17 Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-23 21:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-01-10 18:28   ` pr-tracker-bot
2022-01-10 18:28     ` pr-tracker-bot
2021-12-23 21:34 ` [GIT PULL 3/5] ARM: SoC driver updates for v5.17 Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-23 21:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-01-10 18:28   ` pr-tracker-bot
2022-01-10 18:28     ` pr-tracker-bot
2021-12-23 21:35 ` [GIT PULL 4/5] ARM: SoC devicetree changes " Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-23 21:35   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-01-10 18:28   ` pr-tracker-bot
2022-01-10 18:28     ` pr-tracker-bot
2021-12-23 21:37 ` [GIT PULL 5/5] SoC: Add support for StarFive JH7100 RISC-V SoC Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-23 21:37   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-01-10 18:28   ` pr-tracker-bot
2022-01-10 18:28     ` pr-tracker-bot
2021-12-24 17:11 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2021-12-24 17:11   ` [GIT PULL 0/5] SoC changes for 5.17 Florian Fainelli
2022-01-04 21:58   ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-04 21:58     ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-05  0:40     ` Olof Johansson
2022-01-05  0:40       ` Olof Johansson
2022-01-05  1:40       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-01-05  1:40         ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-01-10 18:32         ` Olof Johansson
2022-01-10 18:32           ` Olof Johansson
2022-01-10 18:56           ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-10 18:56             ` Florian Fainelli
2022-01-25 18:47           ` Bjorn Andersson
2022-01-25 18:47             ` Bjorn Andersson
2022-02-07 14:32 ` patchwork-bot+linux-soc
2022-10-28 21:03 Tj Nenka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7e480da8-0d54-2d62-0a8e-184901c974b6@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=soc@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.