From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tiwei.bie@intel.com, jfreimann@redhat.com, wexu@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC V3 PATCH 0/8] Packed ring for vhost
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:04:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <803cf7fa-6c74-0506-d609-8f0b79b2c254@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180423201151.GD5215@char.us.oracle.com>
On 2018年04月24日 04:11, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:59:43PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 03:31:20PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:34:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> Hi all:
>>>>
>>>> This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with
>>>> Tiwei's RFC V2 a thttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/1/48. Some fixups and
>>>> tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run. TCP stream
>>>> and pktgen does not show obvious difference compared with split ring.
>>> I have to ask then - what is the benefit of this?
>> You can use this with dpdk within guest.
>> The DPDK version did see a performance improvement so hopefully with
> Is there a link to this performance improvement document?
>
You probably want to this:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@dpdk.org/msg97735.html
Thanks
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, wexu@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC V3 PATCH 0/8] Packed ring for vhost
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:04:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <803cf7fa-6c74-0506-d609-8f0b79b2c254@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180423201151.GD5215@char.us.oracle.com>
On 2018年04月24日 04:11, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:59:43PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 03:31:20PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:34:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> Hi all:
>>>>
>>>> This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with
>>>> Tiwei's RFC V2 a thttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/1/48. Some fixups and
>>>> tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run. TCP stream
>>>> and pktgen does not show obvious difference compared with split ring.
>>> I have to ask then - what is the benefit of this?
>> You can use this with dpdk within guest.
>> The DPDK version did see a performance improvement so hopefully with
> Is there a link to this performance improvement document?
>
You probably want to this:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@dpdk.org/msg97735.html
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-24 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-23 5:34 [RFC V3 PATCH 0/8] Packed ring for vhost Jason Wang
2018-04-23 5:34 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 1/8] vhost: move get_rx_bufs to vhost.c Jason Wang
2018-05-02 8:05 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-02 8:05 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-03 7:19 ` Jason Wang
2018-05-03 7:19 ` Jason Wang
2018-04-23 5:34 ` Jason Wang
2018-04-23 5:34 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 2/8] vhost: hide used ring layout from device Jason Wang
2018-04-23 5:34 ` Jason Wang
2018-04-23 5:34 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 3/8] vhost: do not use vring_used_elem Jason Wang
2018-04-23 5:34 ` Jason Wang
2018-04-23 5:34 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 4/8] vhost_net: do not explicitly manipulate vhost_used_elem Jason Wang
2018-04-23 5:34 ` Jason Wang
2018-04-23 5:34 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 5/8] vhost: vhost_put_user() can accept metadata type Jason Wang
2018-04-23 5:34 ` Jason Wang
2018-04-23 5:34 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 6/8] virtio: introduce packed ring defines Jason Wang
2018-04-23 5:34 ` Jason Wang
2018-04-23 5:34 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 7/8] vhost: packed ring support Jason Wang
2018-04-23 5:34 ` Jason Wang
2018-04-23 5:35 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 8/8] vhost: event suppression for packed ring Jason Wang
2018-04-23 5:35 ` Jason Wang
2018-04-23 19:31 ` [RFC V3 PATCH 0/8] Packed ring for vhost Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-04-23 19:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-04-23 19:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-23 19:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-23 20:11 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-04-23 20:11 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-04-24 1:04 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2018-04-24 1:04 ` Jason Wang
2018-04-23 5:34 Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=803cf7fa-6c74-0506-d609-8f0b79b2c254@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wexu@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.