All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/8] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 12:08:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <821fa66abf8b05f78eb4d25d4b260e3ded887536.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210513184734.29317-1-rppt@kernel.org>

On Thu, 2021-05-13 at 21:47 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> @Andrew, this is based on v5.13-rc1, I can rebase whatever way you
> prefer.
> 
> This is an implementation of "secret" mappings backed by a file
> descriptor.
> 
> The file descriptor backing secret memory mappings is created using a
> dedicated memfd_secret system call The desired protection mode for
> the
> memory is configured using flags parameter of the system call. The
> mmap()
> of the file descriptor created with memfd_secret() will create a
> "secret"
> memory mapping. The pages in that mapping will be marked as not
> present in
> the direct map and will be present only in the page table of the
> owning mm.
> 
> Although normally Linux userspace mappings are protected from other
> users,
> such secret mappings are useful for environments where a hostile
> tenant is
> trying to trick the kernel into giving them access to other tenants
> mappings.
> 
> It's designed to provide the following protections:
> 
> * Enhanced protection (in conjunction with all the other in-kernel
> attack prevention systems) against ROP attacks. Seceretmem makes
> "simple"
> ROP insufficient to perform exfiltration, which increases the
> required
> complexity of the attack. Along with other protections like the
> kernel
> stack size limit and address space layout randomization which make
> finding
> gadgets is really hard, absence of any in-kernel primitive for
> accessing
> secret memory means the one gadget ROP attack can't work. Since the
> only
> way to access secret memory is to reconstruct the missing mapping
> entry,
> the attacker has to recover the physical page and insert a PTE
> pointing to
> it in the kernel and then retrieve the contents.  That takes at least
> three
> gadgets which is a level of difficulty beyond most standard attacks.
> 
> * Prevent cross-process secret userspace memory exposures. Once the
> secret
> memory is allocated, the user can't accidentally pass it into the
> kernel to
> be transmitted somewhere. The secreremem pages cannot be accessed via
> the
> direct map and they are disallowed in GUP.
> 
> * Harden against exploited kernel flaws. In order to access
> secretmem, a
> kernel-side attack would need to either walk the page tables and
> create new
> ones, or spawn a new privileged uiserspace process to perform secrets
> exfiltration using ptrace.
> 
> In the future the secret mappings may be used as a mean to protect
> guest memory
> in a virtual machine host.
> 
> For demonstration of secret memory usage we've created a userspace
> library
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/secret-memory-preloader.git
> 
> that does two things: the first is act as a preloader for openssl to
> redirect all the OPENSSL_malloc calls to secret memory meaning any
> secret
> keys get automatically protected this way and the other thing it does
> is
> expose the API to the user who needs it. We anticipate that a lot of
> the
> use cases would be like the openssl one: many toolkits that deal with
> secret keys already have special handling for the memory to try to
> give
> them greater protection, so this would simply be pluggable into the
> toolkits without any need for user application modification.
> 
> Hiding secret memory mappings behind an anonymous file allows usage
> of
> the page cache for tracking pages allocated for the "secret" mappings
> as
> well as using address_space_operations for e.g. page migration
> callbacks.
> 
> The anonymous file may be also used implicitly, like hugetlb files,
> to
> implement mmap(MAP_SECRET) and use the secret memory areas with
> "native" mm
> ABIs in the future.
> 
> Removing of the pages from the direct map may cause its fragmentation
> on
> architectures that use large pages to map the physical memory which
> affects
> the system performance. However, the original Kconfig text for
> CONFIG_DIRECT_GBPAGES said that gigabyte pages in the direct map "...
> can
> improve the kernel's performance a tiny bit ..." (commit 00d1c5e05736
> ("x86: add gbpages switches")) and the recent report [1] showed that
> "...
> although 1G mappings are a good default choice, there is no
> compelling
> evidence that it must be the only choice". Hence, it is sufficient to
> have
> secretmem disabled by default with the ability of a system
> administrator to
> enable it at boot time.
> 
> In addition, there is also a long term goal to improve management of
> the
> direct map.
> 
> [1] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/213b4567-46ce-f116-9cdf-bbd0c884eb3c@linux.intel.com/
> 
> v19:
> * block /dev/mem mmap access, per David
> * disallow mmap/mprotect with PROT_EXEC, per Kees
> * simplify return in page_is_secretmem(), per Matthew
> * use unsigned int for syscall falgs, per Yury
> 
> v18: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210303162209.8609-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * rebase on v5.12-rc1
> * merge kfence fix into the original patch
> * massage commit message of the patch introducing the memfd_secret
> syscall
> 
> v17: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210208084920.2884-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * Remove pool of large pages backing secretmem allocations, per
> Michal Hocko
> * Add secretmem pages to unevictable LRU, per Michal Hocko
> * Use GFP_HIGHUSER as secretmem mapping mask, per Michal Hocko
> * Make secretmem an opt-in feature that is disabled by default
>  
> v16: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210121122723.3446-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * Fix memory leak intorduced in v15
> * Clean the data left from previous page user before handing the page
> to
>   the userspace
> 
> v15: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210120180612.1058-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * Add riscv/Kconfig update to disable set_memory operations for nommu
>   builds (patch 3)
> * Update the code around add_to_page_cache() per Matthew's comments
>   (patches 6,7)
> * Add fixups for build/checkpatch errors discovered by CI systems
> 
> Older history:
> v14: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201203062949.5484-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v13: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201201074559.27742-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v12: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201125092208.12544-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v11: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201124092556.12009-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v10: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201123095432.5860-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v9: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201117162932.13649-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v8: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201110151444.20662-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v7: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201026083752.13267-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v6: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200924132904.1391-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v5: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200916073539.3552-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v4: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200818141554.13945-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v3: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200804095035.18778-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v2: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200727162935.31714-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v1: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200720092435.17469-1-rppt@kernel.org
> rfc-v2: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200706172051.19465-1-rppt@kernel.org/
> rfc-v1: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200130162340.GA14232@rapoport-lnx/
> rfc-v0: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1572171452-7958-1-git-send-email-rppt@kernel.org/
> 
> Mike Rapoport (8):
>   mmap: make mlock_future_check() global
>   riscv/Kconfig: make direct map manipulation options depend on MMU
>   set_memory: allow set_direct_map_*_noflush() for multiple pages
>   set_memory: allow querying whether set_direct_map_*() is actually
> enabled
>   mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory
> areas
>   PM: hibernate: disable when there are active secretmem users
>   arch, mm: wire up memfd_secret system call where relevant
>   secretmem: test: add basic selftest for memfd_secret(2)
> 
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild             |   1 -
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h       |   6 -
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kfence.h           |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/set_memory.h       |  17 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h      |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c         |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c                       |   6 +-
>  arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c                  |  23 +-
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig                        |   4 +-
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/set_memory.h       |   4 +-
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/unistd.h           |   1 +
>  arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c                  |   8 +-
>  arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl    |   1 +
>  arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl    |   1 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h         |   4 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c              |   8 +-
>  drivers/char/mem.c                        |   4 +
>  include/linux/secretmem.h                 |  54 ++++
>  include/linux/set_memory.h                |  16 +-
>  include/linux/syscalls.h                  |   1 +
>  include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h         |   7 +-
>  include/uapi/linux/magic.h                |   1 +
>  kernel/power/hibernate.c                  |   5 +-
>  kernel/power/snapshot.c                   |   4 +-
>  kernel/sys_ni.c                           |   2 +
>  mm/Kconfig                                |   4 +
>  mm/Makefile                               |   1 +
>  mm/gup.c                                  |  12 +
>  mm/internal.h                             |   3 +
>  mm/mlock.c                                |   3 +-
>  mm/mmap.c                                 |   5 +-
>  mm/secretmem.c                            | 254 +++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/vmalloc.c                              |   5 +-
>  scripts/checksyscalls.sh                  |   4 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/.gitignore     |   1 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile       |   3 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c | 296
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh |  17 ++
>  38 files changed, 744 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/set_memory.h
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/secretmem.h
>  create mode 100644 mm/secretmem.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
> 
> 
> base-commit: 6efb943b8616ec53a5e444193dccf1af9ad627b5

For the series:

Acked-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>

James




WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/8] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 12:08:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <821fa66abf8b05f78eb4d25d4b260e3ded887536.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210513184734.29317-1-rppt@kernel.org>

On Thu, 2021-05-13 at 21:47 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> @Andrew, this is based on v5.13-rc1, I can rebase whatever way you
> prefer.
> 
> This is an implementation of "secret" mappings backed by a file
> descriptor.
> 
> The file descriptor backing secret memory mappings is created using a
> dedicated memfd_secret system call The desired protection mode for
> the
> memory is configured using flags parameter of the system call. The
> mmap()
> of the file descriptor created with memfd_secret() will create a
> "secret"
> memory mapping. The pages in that mapping will be marked as not
> present in
> the direct map and will be present only in the page table of the
> owning mm.
> 
> Although normally Linux userspace mappings are protected from other
> users,
> such secret mappings are useful for environments where a hostile
> tenant is
> trying to trick the kernel into giving them access to other tenants
> mappings.
> 
> It's designed to provide the following protections:
> 
> * Enhanced protection (in conjunction with all the other in-kernel
> attack prevention systems) against ROP attacks. Seceretmem makes
> "simple"
> ROP insufficient to perform exfiltration, which increases the
> required
> complexity of the attack. Along with other protections like the
> kernel
> stack size limit and address space layout randomization which make
> finding
> gadgets is really hard, absence of any in-kernel primitive for
> accessing
> secret memory means the one gadget ROP attack can't work. Since the
> only
> way to access secret memory is to reconstruct the missing mapping
> entry,
> the attacker has to recover the physical page and insert a PTE
> pointing to
> it in the kernel and then retrieve the contents.  That takes at least
> three
> gadgets which is a level of difficulty beyond most standard attacks.
> 
> * Prevent cross-process secret userspace memory exposures. Once the
> secret
> memory is allocated, the user can't accidentally pass it into the
> kernel to
> be transmitted somewhere. The secreremem pages cannot be accessed via
> the
> direct map and they are disallowed in GUP.
> 
> * Harden against exploited kernel flaws. In order to access
> secretmem, a
> kernel-side attack would need to either walk the page tables and
> create new
> ones, or spawn a new privileged uiserspace process to perform secrets
> exfiltration using ptrace.
> 
> In the future the secret mappings may be used as a mean to protect
> guest memory
> in a virtual machine host.
> 
> For demonstration of secret memory usage we've created a userspace
> library
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/secret-memory-preloader.git
> 
> that does two things: the first is act as a preloader for openssl to
> redirect all the OPENSSL_malloc calls to secret memory meaning any
> secret
> keys get automatically protected this way and the other thing it does
> is
> expose the API to the user who needs it. We anticipate that a lot of
> the
> use cases would be like the openssl one: many toolkits that deal with
> secret keys already have special handling for the memory to try to
> give
> them greater protection, so this would simply be pluggable into the
> toolkits without any need for user application modification.
> 
> Hiding secret memory mappings behind an anonymous file allows usage
> of
> the page cache for tracking pages allocated for the "secret" mappings
> as
> well as using address_space_operations for e.g. page migration
> callbacks.
> 
> The anonymous file may be also used implicitly, like hugetlb files,
> to
> implement mmap(MAP_SECRET) and use the secret memory areas with
> "native" mm
> ABIs in the future.
> 
> Removing of the pages from the direct map may cause its fragmentation
> on
> architectures that use large pages to map the physical memory which
> affects
> the system performance. However, the original Kconfig text for
> CONFIG_DIRECT_GBPAGES said that gigabyte pages in the direct map "...
> can
> improve the kernel's performance a tiny bit ..." (commit 00d1c5e05736
> ("x86: add gbpages switches")) and the recent report [1] showed that
> "...
> although 1G mappings are a good default choice, there is no
> compelling
> evidence that it must be the only choice". Hence, it is sufficient to
> have
> secretmem disabled by default with the ability of a system
> administrator to
> enable it at boot time.
> 
> In addition, there is also a long term goal to improve management of
> the
> direct map.
> 
> [1] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/213b4567-46ce-f116-9cdf-bbd0c884eb3c@linux.intel.com/
> 
> v19:
> * block /dev/mem mmap access, per David
> * disallow mmap/mprotect with PROT_EXEC, per Kees
> * simplify return in page_is_secretmem(), per Matthew
> * use unsigned int for syscall falgs, per Yury
> 
> v18: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210303162209.8609-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * rebase on v5.12-rc1
> * merge kfence fix into the original patch
> * massage commit message of the patch introducing the memfd_secret
> syscall
> 
> v17: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210208084920.2884-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * Remove pool of large pages backing secretmem allocations, per
> Michal Hocko
> * Add secretmem pages to unevictable LRU, per Michal Hocko
> * Use GFP_HIGHUSER as secretmem mapping mask, per Michal Hocko
> * Make secretmem an opt-in feature that is disabled by default
>  
> v16: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210121122723.3446-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * Fix memory leak intorduced in v15
> * Clean the data left from previous page user before handing the page
> to
>   the userspace
> 
> v15: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210120180612.1058-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * Add riscv/Kconfig update to disable set_memory operations for nommu
>   builds (patch 3)
> * Update the code around add_to_page_cache() per Matthew's comments
>   (patches 6,7)
> * Add fixups for build/checkpatch errors discovered by CI systems
> 
> Older history:
> v14: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201203062949.5484-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v13: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201201074559.27742-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v12: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201125092208.12544-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v11: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201124092556.12009-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v10: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201123095432.5860-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v9: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201117162932.13649-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v8: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201110151444.20662-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v7: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201026083752.13267-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v6: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200924132904.1391-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v5: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200916073539.3552-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v4: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200818141554.13945-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v3: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200804095035.18778-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v2: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200727162935.31714-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v1: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200720092435.17469-1-rppt@kernel.org
> rfc-v2: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200706172051.19465-1-rppt@kernel.org/
> rfc-v1: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200130162340.GA14232@rapoport-lnx/
> rfc-v0: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1572171452-7958-1-git-send-email-rppt@kernel.org/
> 
> Mike Rapoport (8):
>   mmap: make mlock_future_check() global
>   riscv/Kconfig: make direct map manipulation options depend on MMU
>   set_memory: allow set_direct_map_*_noflush() for multiple pages
>   set_memory: allow querying whether set_direct_map_*() is actually
> enabled
>   mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory
> areas
>   PM: hibernate: disable when there are active secretmem users
>   arch, mm: wire up memfd_secret system call where relevant
>   secretmem: test: add basic selftest for memfd_secret(2)
> 
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild             |   1 -
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h       |   6 -
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kfence.h           |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/set_memory.h       |  17 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h      |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c         |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c                       |   6 +-
>  arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c                  |  23 +-
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig                        |   4 +-
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/set_memory.h       |   4 +-
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/unistd.h           |   1 +
>  arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c                  |   8 +-
>  arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl    |   1 +
>  arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl    |   1 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h         |   4 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c              |   8 +-
>  drivers/char/mem.c                        |   4 +
>  include/linux/secretmem.h                 |  54 ++++
>  include/linux/set_memory.h                |  16 +-
>  include/linux/syscalls.h                  |   1 +
>  include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h         |   7 +-
>  include/uapi/linux/magic.h                |   1 +
>  kernel/power/hibernate.c                  |   5 +-
>  kernel/power/snapshot.c                   |   4 +-
>  kernel/sys_ni.c                           |   2 +
>  mm/Kconfig                                |   4 +
>  mm/Makefile                               |   1 +
>  mm/gup.c                                  |  12 +
>  mm/internal.h                             |   3 +
>  mm/mlock.c                                |   3 +-
>  mm/mmap.c                                 |   5 +-
>  mm/secretmem.c                            | 254 +++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/vmalloc.c                              |   5 +-
>  scripts/checksyscalls.sh                  |   4 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/.gitignore     |   1 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile       |   3 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c | 296
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh |  17 ++
>  38 files changed, 744 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/set_memory.h
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/secretmem.h
>  create mode 100644 mm/secretmem.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
> 
> 
> base-commit: 6efb943b8616ec53a5e444193dccf1af9ad627b5

For the series:

Acked-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>

James




_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki  <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Rick Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel. com>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/8] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 12:08:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <821fa66abf8b05f78eb4d25d4b260e3ded887536.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210513184734.29317-1-rppt@kernel.org>

On Thu, 2021-05-13 at 21:47 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> @Andrew, this is based on v5.13-rc1, I can rebase whatever way you
> prefer.
> 
> This is an implementation of "secret" mappings backed by a file
> descriptor.
> 
> The file descriptor backing secret memory mappings is created using a
> dedicated memfd_secret system call The desired protection mode for
> the
> memory is configured using flags parameter of the system call. The
> mmap()
> of the file descriptor created with memfd_secret() will create a
> "secret"
> memory mapping. The pages in that mapping will be marked as not
> present in
> the direct map and will be present only in the page table of the
> owning mm.
> 
> Although normally Linux userspace mappings are protected from other
> users,
> such secret mappings are useful for environments where a hostile
> tenant is
> trying to trick the kernel into giving them access to other tenants
> mappings.
> 
> It's designed to provide the following protections:
> 
> * Enhanced protection (in conjunction with all the other in-kernel
> attack prevention systems) against ROP attacks. Seceretmem makes
> "simple"
> ROP insufficient to perform exfiltration, which increases the
> required
> complexity of the attack. Along with other protections like the
> kernel
> stack size limit and address space layout randomization which make
> finding
> gadgets is really hard, absence of any in-kernel primitive for
> accessing
> secret memory means the one gadget ROP attack can't work. Since the
> only
> way to access secret memory is to reconstruct the missing mapping
> entry,
> the attacker has to recover the physical page and insert a PTE
> pointing to
> it in the kernel and then retrieve the contents.  That takes at least
> three
> gadgets which is a level of difficulty beyond most standard attacks.
> 
> * Prevent cross-process secret userspace memory exposures. Once the
> secret
> memory is allocated, the user can't accidentally pass it into the
> kernel to
> be transmitted somewhere. The secreremem pages cannot be accessed via
> the
> direct map and they are disallowed in GUP.
> 
> * Harden against exploited kernel flaws. In order to access
> secretmem, a
> kernel-side attack would need to either walk the page tables and
> create new
> ones, or spawn a new privileged uiserspace process to perform secrets
> exfiltration using ptrace.
> 
> In the future the secret mappings may be used as a mean to protect
> guest memory
> in a virtual machine host.
> 
> For demonstration of secret memory usage we've created a userspace
> library
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/secret-memory-preloader.git
> 
> that does two things: the first is act as a preloader for openssl to
> redirect all the OPENSSL_malloc calls to secret memory meaning any
> secret
> keys get automatically protected this way and the other thing it does
> is
> expose the API to the user who needs it. We anticipate that a lot of
> the
> use cases would be like the openssl one: many toolkits that deal with
> secret keys already have special handling for the memory to try to
> give
> them greater protection, so this would simply be pluggable into the
> toolkits without any need for user application modification.
> 
> Hiding secret memory mappings behind an anonymous file allows usage
> of
> the page cache for tracking pages allocated for the "secret" mappings
> as
> well as using address_space_operations for e.g. page migration
> callbacks.
> 
> The anonymous file may be also used implicitly, like hugetlb files,
> to
> implement mmap(MAP_SECRET) and use the secret memory areas with
> "native" mm
> ABIs in the future.
> 
> Removing of the pages from the direct map may cause its fragmentation
> on
> architectures that use large pages to map the physical memory which
> affects
> the system performance. However, the original Kconfig text for
> CONFIG_DIRECT_GBPAGES said that gigabyte pages in the direct map "...
> can
> improve the kernel's performance a tiny bit ..." (commit 00d1c5e05736
> ("x86: add gbpages switches")) and the recent report [1] showed that
> "...
> although 1G mappings are a good default choice, there is no
> compelling
> evidence that it must be the only choice". Hence, it is sufficient to
> have
> secretmem disabled by default with the ability of a system
> administrator to
> enable it at boot time.
> 
> In addition, there is also a long term goal to improve management of
> the
> direct map.
> 
> [1] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/213b4567-46ce-f116-9cdf-bbd0c884eb3c@linux.intel.com/
> 
> v19:
> * block /dev/mem mmap access, per David
> * disallow mmap/mprotect with PROT_EXEC, per Kees
> * simplify return in page_is_secretmem(), per Matthew
> * use unsigned int for syscall falgs, per Yury
> 
> v18: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210303162209.8609-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * rebase on v5.12-rc1
> * merge kfence fix into the original patch
> * massage commit message of the patch introducing the memfd_secret
> syscall
> 
> v17: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210208084920.2884-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * Remove pool of large pages backing secretmem allocations, per
> Michal Hocko
> * Add secretmem pages to unevictable LRU, per Michal Hocko
> * Use GFP_HIGHUSER as secretmem mapping mask, per Michal Hocko
> * Make secretmem an opt-in feature that is disabled by default
>  
> v16: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210121122723.3446-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * Fix memory leak intorduced in v15
> * Clean the data left from previous page user before handing the page
> to
>   the userspace
> 
> v15: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210120180612.1058-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * Add riscv/Kconfig update to disable set_memory operations for nommu
>   builds (patch 3)
> * Update the code around add_to_page_cache() per Matthew's comments
>   (patches 6,7)
> * Add fixups for build/checkpatch errors discovered by CI systems
> 
> Older history:
> v14: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201203062949.5484-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v13: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201201074559.27742-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v12: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201125092208.12544-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v11: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201124092556.12009-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v10: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201123095432.5860-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v9: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201117162932.13649-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v8: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201110151444.20662-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v7: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201026083752.13267-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v6: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200924132904.1391-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v5: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200916073539.3552-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v4: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200818141554.13945-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v3: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200804095035.18778-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v2: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200727162935.31714-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v1: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200720092435.17469-1-rppt@kernel.org
> rfc-v2: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200706172051.19465-1-rppt@kernel.org/
> rfc-v1: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200130162340.GA14232@rapoport-lnx/
> rfc-v0: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1572171452-7958-1-git-send-email-rppt@kernel.org/
> 
> Mike Rapoport (8):
>   mmap: make mlock_future_check() global
>   riscv/Kconfig: make direct map manipulation options depend on MMU
>   set_memory: allow set_direct_map_*_noflush() for multiple pages
>   set_memory: allow querying whether set_direct_map_*() is actually
> enabled
>   mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory
> areas
>   PM: hibernate: disable when there are active secretmem users
>   arch, mm: wire up memfd_secret system call where relevant
>   secretmem: test: add basic selftest for memfd_secret(2)
> 
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild             |   1 -
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h       |   6 -
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kfence.h           |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/set_memory.h       |  17 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h      |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c         |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c                       |   6 +-
>  arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c                  |  23 +-
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig                        |   4 +-
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/set_memory.h       |   4 +-
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/unistd.h           |   1 +
>  arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c                  |   8 +-
>  arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl    |   1 +
>  arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl    |   1 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h         |   4 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c              |   8 +-
>  drivers/char/mem.c                        |   4 +
>  include/linux/secretmem.h                 |  54 ++++
>  include/linux/set_memory.h                |  16 +-
>  include/linux/syscalls.h                  |   1 +
>  include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h         |   7 +-
>  include/uapi/linux/magic.h                |   1 +
>  kernel/power/hibernate.c                  |   5 +-
>  kernel/power/snapshot.c                   |   4 +-
>  kernel/sys_ni.c                           |   2 +
>  mm/Kconfig                                |   4 +
>  mm/Makefile                               |   1 +
>  mm/gup.c                                  |  12 +
>  mm/internal.h                             |   3 +
>  mm/mlock.c                                |   3 +-
>  mm/mmap.c                                 |   5 +-
>  mm/secretmem.c                            | 254 +++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/vmalloc.c                              |   5 +-
>  scripts/checksyscalls.sh                  |   4 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/.gitignore     |   1 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile       |   3 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c | 296
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh |  17 ++
>  38 files changed, 744 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/set_memory.h
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/secretmem.h
>  create mode 100644 mm/secretmem.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
> 
> 
> base-commit: 6efb943b8616ec53a5e444193dccf1af9ad627b5

For the series:

Acked-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>

James


_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 0/8] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 12:08:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <821fa66abf8b05f78eb4d25d4b260e3ded887536.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210513184734.29317-1-rppt@kernel.org>

On Thu, 2021-05-13 at 21:47 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> @Andrew, this is based on v5.13-rc1, I can rebase whatever way you
> prefer.
> 
> This is an implementation of "secret" mappings backed by a file
> descriptor.
> 
> The file descriptor backing secret memory mappings is created using a
> dedicated memfd_secret system call The desired protection mode for
> the
> memory is configured using flags parameter of the system call. The
> mmap()
> of the file descriptor created with memfd_secret() will create a
> "secret"
> memory mapping. The pages in that mapping will be marked as not
> present in
> the direct map and will be present only in the page table of the
> owning mm.
> 
> Although normally Linux userspace mappings are protected from other
> users,
> such secret mappings are useful for environments where a hostile
> tenant is
> trying to trick the kernel into giving them access to other tenants
> mappings.
> 
> It's designed to provide the following protections:
> 
> * Enhanced protection (in conjunction with all the other in-kernel
> attack prevention systems) against ROP attacks. Seceretmem makes
> "simple"
> ROP insufficient to perform exfiltration, which increases the
> required
> complexity of the attack. Along with other protections like the
> kernel
> stack size limit and address space layout randomization which make
> finding
> gadgets is really hard, absence of any in-kernel primitive for
> accessing
> secret memory means the one gadget ROP attack can't work. Since the
> only
> way to access secret memory is to reconstruct the missing mapping
> entry,
> the attacker has to recover the physical page and insert a PTE
> pointing to
> it in the kernel and then retrieve the contents.  That takes at least
> three
> gadgets which is a level of difficulty beyond most standard attacks.
> 
> * Prevent cross-process secret userspace memory exposures. Once the
> secret
> memory is allocated, the user can't accidentally pass it into the
> kernel to
> be transmitted somewhere. The secreremem pages cannot be accessed via
> the
> direct map and they are disallowed in GUP.
> 
> * Harden against exploited kernel flaws. In order to access
> secretmem, a
> kernel-side attack would need to either walk the page tables and
> create new
> ones, or spawn a new privileged uiserspace process to perform secrets
> exfiltration using ptrace.
> 
> In the future the secret mappings may be used as a mean to protect
> guest memory
> in a virtual machine host.
> 
> For demonstration of secret memory usage we've created a userspace
> library
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/secret-memory-preloader.git
> 
> that does two things: the first is act as a preloader for openssl to
> redirect all the OPENSSL_malloc calls to secret memory meaning any
> secret
> keys get automatically protected this way and the other thing it does
> is
> expose the API to the user who needs it. We anticipate that a lot of
> the
> use cases would be like the openssl one: many toolkits that deal with
> secret keys already have special handling for the memory to try to
> give
> them greater protection, so this would simply be pluggable into the
> toolkits without any need for user application modification.
> 
> Hiding secret memory mappings behind an anonymous file allows usage
> of
> the page cache for tracking pages allocated for the "secret" mappings
> as
> well as using address_space_operations for e.g. page migration
> callbacks.
> 
> The anonymous file may be also used implicitly, like hugetlb files,
> to
> implement mmap(MAP_SECRET) and use the secret memory areas with
> "native" mm
> ABIs in the future.
> 
> Removing of the pages from the direct map may cause its fragmentation
> on
> architectures that use large pages to map the physical memory which
> affects
> the system performance. However, the original Kconfig text for
> CONFIG_DIRECT_GBPAGES said that gigabyte pages in the direct map "...
> can
> improve the kernel's performance a tiny bit ..." (commit 00d1c5e05736
> ("x86: add gbpages switches")) and the recent report [1] showed that
> "...
> although 1G mappings are a good default choice, there is no
> compelling
> evidence that it must be the only choice". Hence, it is sufficient to
> have
> secretmem disabled by default with the ability of a system
> administrator to
> enable it at boot time.
> 
> In addition, there is also a long term goal to improve management of
> the
> direct map.
> 
> [1] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/213b4567-46ce-f116-9cdf-bbd0c884eb3c@linux.intel.com/
> 
> v19:
> * block /dev/mem mmap access, per David
> * disallow mmap/mprotect with PROT_EXEC, per Kees
> * simplify return in page_is_secretmem(), per Matthew
> * use unsigned int for syscall falgs, per Yury
> 
> v18: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210303162209.8609-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * rebase on v5.12-rc1
> * merge kfence fix into the original patch
> * massage commit message of the patch introducing the memfd_secret
> syscall
> 
> v17: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210208084920.2884-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * Remove pool of large pages backing secretmem allocations, per
> Michal Hocko
> * Add secretmem pages to unevictable LRU, per Michal Hocko
> * Use GFP_HIGHUSER as secretmem mapping mask, per Michal Hocko
> * Make secretmem an opt-in feature that is disabled by default
>  
> v16: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210121122723.3446-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * Fix memory leak intorduced in v15
> * Clean the data left from previous page user before handing the page
> to
>   the userspace
> 
> v15: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210120180612.1058-1-rppt@kernel.org
> * Add riscv/Kconfig update to disable set_memory operations for nommu
>   builds (patch 3)
> * Update the code around add_to_page_cache() per Matthew's comments
>   (patches 6,7)
> * Add fixups for build/checkpatch errors discovered by CI systems
> 
> Older history:
> v14: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201203062949.5484-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v13: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201201074559.27742-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v12: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201125092208.12544-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v11: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201124092556.12009-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v10: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201123095432.5860-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v9: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201117162932.13649-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v8: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201110151444.20662-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v7: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201026083752.13267-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v6: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200924132904.1391-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v5: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200916073539.3552-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v4: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200818141554.13945-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v3: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200804095035.18778-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v2: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200727162935.31714-1-rppt@kernel.org
> v1: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200720092435.17469-1-rppt@kernel.org
> rfc-v2: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200706172051.19465-1-rppt@kernel.org/
> rfc-v1: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200130162340.GA14232@rapoport-lnx/
> rfc-v0: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1572171452-7958-1-git-send-email-rppt@kernel.org/
> 
> Mike Rapoport (8):
>   mmap: make mlock_future_check() global
>   riscv/Kconfig: make direct map manipulation options depend on MMU
>   set_memory: allow set_direct_map_*_noflush() for multiple pages
>   set_memory: allow querying whether set_direct_map_*() is actually
> enabled
>   mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory
> areas
>   PM: hibernate: disable when there are active secretmem users
>   arch, mm: wire up memfd_secret system call where relevant
>   secretmem: test: add basic selftest for memfd_secret(2)
> 
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild             |   1 -
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h       |   6 -
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kfence.h           |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/set_memory.h       |  17 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h      |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c         |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c                       |   6 +-
>  arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c                  |  23 +-
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig                        |   4 +-
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/set_memory.h       |   4 +-
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/unistd.h           |   1 +
>  arch/riscv/mm/pageattr.c                  |   8 +-
>  arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl    |   1 +
>  arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl    |   1 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h         |   4 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c              |   8 +-
>  drivers/char/mem.c                        |   4 +
>  include/linux/secretmem.h                 |  54 ++++
>  include/linux/set_memory.h                |  16 +-
>  include/linux/syscalls.h                  |   1 +
>  include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h         |   7 +-
>  include/uapi/linux/magic.h                |   1 +
>  kernel/power/hibernate.c                  |   5 +-
>  kernel/power/snapshot.c                   |   4 +-
>  kernel/sys_ni.c                           |   2 +
>  mm/Kconfig                                |   4 +
>  mm/Makefile                               |   1 +
>  mm/gup.c                                  |  12 +
>  mm/internal.h                             |   3 +
>  mm/mlock.c                                |   3 +-
>  mm/mmap.c                                 |   5 +-
>  mm/secretmem.c                            | 254 +++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/vmalloc.c                              |   5 +-
>  scripts/checksyscalls.sh                  |   4 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/.gitignore     |   1 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile       |   3 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c | 296
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh |  17 ++
>  38 files changed, 744 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/set_memory.h
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/secretmem.h
>  create mode 100644 mm/secretmem.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
> 
> 
> base-commit: 6efb943b8616ec53a5e444193dccf1af9ad627b5

For the series:

Acked-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>

James




_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-13 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-13 18:47 [PATCH v19 0/8] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47 ` [PATCH v19 1/8] mmap: make mlock_future_check() global Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-14  8:27   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  8:27     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  8:27     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  8:27     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-13 18:47 ` [PATCH v19 2/8] riscv/Kconfig: make direct map manipulation options depend on MMU Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-14  8:28   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  8:28     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  8:28     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  8:28     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-13 18:47 ` [PATCH v19 3/8] set_memory: allow set_direct_map_*_noflush() for multiple pages Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-14  8:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  8:43     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  8:43     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  8:43     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-16  7:13     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-16  7:13       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-16  7:13       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-16  7:13       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47 ` [PATCH v19 4/8] set_memory: allow querying whether set_direct_map_*() is actually enabled Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47 ` [PATCH v19 5/8] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-14  8:50   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  8:50     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  8:50     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  8:50     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-17  7:23     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-17  7:23       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-17  7:23       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-17  7:23       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-14  9:25   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  9:25     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  9:25     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  9:25     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-16  7:29     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-16  7:29       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-16  7:29       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-16  7:29       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-18  9:59       ` Michal Hocko
2021-05-18  9:59         ` Michal Hocko
2021-05-18  9:59         ` Michal Hocko
2021-05-18  9:59         ` Michal Hocko
2021-05-18 10:06         ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-18 10:06           ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-18 10:06           ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-18 10:06           ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-18 10:31           ` Michal Hocko
2021-05-18 10:31             ` Michal Hocko
2021-05-18 10:31             ` Michal Hocko
2021-05-18 10:31             ` Michal Hocko
2021-05-18 10:35             ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-18 10:35               ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-18 10:35               ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-18 10:35               ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-18 11:08               ` Michal Hocko
2021-05-18 11:08                 ` Michal Hocko
2021-05-18 11:08                 ` Michal Hocko
2021-05-18 11:08                 ` Michal Hocko
2021-05-19  7:13                 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-19  7:13                   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-19  7:13                   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-19  7:13                   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47 ` [PATCH v19 6/8] PM: hibernate: disable when there are active secretmem users Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-14  9:27   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  9:27     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  9:27     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  9:27     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-18 10:24   ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-18 10:24     ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-18 10:24     ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-18 10:24     ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-18 10:27     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-18 10:27       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-18 10:27       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-18 10:27       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-19  1:32     ` James Bottomley
2021-05-19  1:32       ` James Bottomley
2021-05-19  1:32       ` James Bottomley
2021-05-19  1:32       ` James Bottomley
2021-05-19  1:49       ` Dan Williams
2021-05-19  1:49         ` Dan Williams
2021-05-19  1:49         ` Dan Williams
2021-05-19  1:49         ` Dan Williams
2021-05-19  1:49         ` Dan Williams
2021-05-19  3:50         ` James Bottomley
2021-05-19  3:50           ` James Bottomley
2021-05-19  3:50           ` James Bottomley
2021-05-19  3:50           ` James Bottomley
2021-05-13 18:47 ` [PATCH v19 7/8] arch, mm: wire up memfd_secret system call where relevant Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-14  9:27   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  9:27     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  9:27     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  9:27     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-13 18:47 ` [PATCH v19 8/8] secretmem: test: add basic selftest for memfd_secret(2) Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-13 18:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-14  9:40   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  9:40     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  9:40     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-14  9:40     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-13 19:08 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2021-05-13 19:08   ` [PATCH v19 0/8] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas James Bottomley
2021-05-13 19:08   ` James Bottomley
2021-05-13 19:08   ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=821fa66abf8b05f78eb4d25d4b260e3ded887536.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hagen@jauu.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=palmerdabbelt@google.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.