From: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>, marc.zyngier@arm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3-its: fix ITS queue timeout Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 11:16:05 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <834fde1b-5ae0-afc6-283f-2a470757e54a@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1528180225-16144-1-git-send-email-yangyingliang@huawei.com> Hi Yang, On 05/06/18 07:30, Yang Yingliang wrote: > When the kernel booted with maxcpus=x, 'x' is smaller > than actual cpu numbers, the TAs of offline cpus won't > be set to its->collection. > > If LPI is bind to offline cpu, sync cmd will use zero TA, > it leads to ITS queue timeout. Fix this by choosing a > online cpu, if there is no online cpu in cpu_mask. > > Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c > index 5416f2b..edd92a9 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c > @@ -2309,7 +2309,9 @@ static int its_irq_domain_activate(struct irq_domain *domain, > cpu_mask = cpumask_of_node(its_dev->its->numa_node); > > /* Bind the LPI to the first possible CPU */ > - cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_mask); > + cpu = cpumask_first_and(cpu_mask, cpu_online_mask); > + if (!cpu_online(cpu)) Testing for cpu being online here feels a bit redundant. Since cpu is online if the cpumask_first_and returns a valid cpu, I think you could replace this test with: if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) > + cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask); > its_dev->event_map.col_map[event] = cpu; > irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu)); > > @@ -2466,7 +2468,10 @@ static int its_vpe_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, > bool force) > { > struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); > - int cpu = cpumask_first(mask_val); > + int cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask); > + > + if (!cpu_online(cpu)) Same thing here. > + cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask); > > /* > * Changing affinity is mega expensive, so let's be as lazy as > Cheers, -- Julien Thierry
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: julien.thierry@arm.com (Julien Thierry) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3-its: fix ITS queue timeout Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 11:16:05 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <834fde1b-5ae0-afc6-283f-2a470757e54a@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1528180225-16144-1-git-send-email-yangyingliang@huawei.com> Hi Yang, On 05/06/18 07:30, Yang Yingliang wrote: > When the kernel booted with maxcpus=x, 'x' is smaller > than actual cpu numbers, the TAs of offline cpus won't > be set to its->collection. > > If LPI is bind to offline cpu, sync cmd will use zero TA, > it leads to ITS queue timeout. Fix this by choosing a > online cpu, if there is no online cpu in cpu_mask. > > Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c > index 5416f2b..edd92a9 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c > @@ -2309,7 +2309,9 @@ static int its_irq_domain_activate(struct irq_domain *domain, > cpu_mask = cpumask_of_node(its_dev->its->numa_node); > > /* Bind the LPI to the first possible CPU */ > - cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_mask); > + cpu = cpumask_first_and(cpu_mask, cpu_online_mask); > + if (!cpu_online(cpu)) Testing for cpu being online here feels a bit redundant. Since cpu is online if the cpumask_first_and returns a valid cpu, I think you could replace this test with: if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) > + cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask); > its_dev->event_map.col_map[event] = cpu; > irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu)); > > @@ -2466,7 +2468,10 @@ static int its_vpe_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, > bool force) > { > struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); > - int cpu = cpumask_first(mask_val); > + int cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask); > + > + if (!cpu_online(cpu)) Same thing here. > + cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask); > > /* > * Changing affinity is mega expensive, so let's be as lazy as > Cheers, -- Julien Thierry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-05 10:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-06-05 6:30 [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3-its: fix ITS queue timeout Yang Yingliang 2018-06-05 6:30 ` Yang Yingliang 2018-06-05 10:16 ` Julien Thierry [this message] 2018-06-05 10:16 ` Julien Thierry 2018-06-06 1:43 ` Yang Yingliang 2018-06-06 1:43 ` Yang Yingliang
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=834fde1b-5ae0-afc6-283f-2a470757e54a@arm.com \ --to=julien.thierry@arm.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \ --cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.