All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
To: Wen Su <Wen.Su@mediatek.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, wsd_upstream@mediatek.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: regulator: Add document for MT6359 regulator
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:06:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8398188f-820a-5abf-f52e-b79c0c583704@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1581335854.16783.1.camel@mtkswgap22>



On 10/02/2020 12:57, Wen Su wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 11:49 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 11:06:48AM +0800, Wen Su wrote:
>>
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible: "mediatek,mt6359-regulator"
>>
>> Why does this need a compatible string - it looks like it's just
>> encoding the way Linux splits devices up into the DT, not
>> providing some reusable IP block.
> 
> Thanks for your comments.
> I will remove it in the next patch.
> 

If this the way to go, then please fix all the other MediaTek binding
description for regulators (+ the dts) as this is then wrong.

Thanks!
Matthias

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
To: Wen Su <Wen.Su@mediatek.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, wsd_upstream@mediatek.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: regulator: Add document for MT6359 regulator
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:06:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8398188f-820a-5abf-f52e-b79c0c583704@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1581335854.16783.1.camel@mtkswgap22>



On 10/02/2020 12:57, Wen Su wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 11:49 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 11:06:48AM +0800, Wen Su wrote:
>>
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible: "mediatek,mt6359-regulator"
>>
>> Why does this need a compatible string - it looks like it's just
>> encoding the way Linux splits devices up into the DT, not
>> providing some reusable IP block.
> 
> Thanks for your comments.
> I will remove it in the next patch.
> 

If this the way to go, then please fix all the other MediaTek binding
description for regulators (+ the dts) as this is then wrong.

Thanks!
Matthias

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
To: Wen Su <Wen.Su@mediatek.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, wsd_upstream@mediatek.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: regulator: Add document for MT6359 regulator
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:06:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8398188f-820a-5abf-f52e-b79c0c583704@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1581335854.16783.1.camel@mtkswgap22>



On 10/02/2020 12:57, Wen Su wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 11:49 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 11:06:48AM +0800, Wen Su wrote:
>>
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible: "mediatek,mt6359-regulator"
>>
>> Why does this need a compatible string - it looks like it's just
>> encoding the way Linux splits devices up into the DT, not
>> providing some reusable IP block.
> 
> Thanks for your comments.
> I will remove it in the next patch.
> 

If this the way to go, then please fix all the other MediaTek binding
description for regulators (+ the dts) as this is then wrong.

Thanks!
Matthias

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-11 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-06  3:06 [PATCH v2 0/4] Add Support for MediaTek PMIC MT6359 Regulator Wen Su
2020-02-06  3:06 ` Wen Su
2020-02-06  3:06 ` Wen Su
2020-02-06  3:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: regulator: Add document for MT6359 regulator Wen Su
2020-02-06  3:06   ` Wen Su
2020-02-06  3:06   ` Wen Su
2020-02-06 11:49   ` Mark Brown
2020-02-06 11:49     ` Mark Brown
2020-02-06 11:49     ` Mark Brown
2020-02-10 11:57     ` Wen Su
2020-02-10 11:57       ` Wen Su
2020-02-10 11:57       ` Wen Su
2020-02-11 16:06       ` Matthias Brugger [this message]
2020-02-11 16:06         ` Matthias Brugger
2020-02-11 16:06         ` Matthias Brugger
2020-02-12  6:08         ` Wen Su
2020-02-12  6:08           ` Wen Su
2020-02-12  6:08           ` Wen Su
2020-02-06  3:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mfd: Add for PMIC MT6359 registers definition Wen Su
2020-02-06  3:06   ` Wen Su
2020-02-06  3:06   ` Wen Su
2020-02-06  3:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] regulator: mt6359: Add support for MT6359 regulator Wen Su
2020-02-06  3:06   ` Wen Su
2020-02-06  3:06   ` Wen Su
2020-02-06  3:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: mt6359: add PMIC MT6359 related nodes Wen Su
2020-02-06  3:06   ` Wen Su
2020-02-06  3:06   ` Wen Su

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8398188f-820a-5abf-f52e-b79c0c583704@gmail.com \
    --to=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=Wen.Su@mediatek.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.