From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>
Cc: George Cherian <gcherian@marvell.com>,
"Dave.Martin@arm.com" <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
"alexandru.elisei@arm.com" <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
"andre.przywara@arm.com" <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
"christoffer.dall@arm.com" <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
"james.morse@arm.com" <james.morse@arm.com>,
"jintack@cs.columbia.edu" <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>,
"julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com" <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"suzuki.poulose@arm.com" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Anil Kumar Reddy H <areddy3@marvell.com>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 10:23:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86r1wus7df.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED342E29B9@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Hi Zengtao,
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:10:05 +0100,
"Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Marc:
>
> Since it's a very large patch series, I want to test it on my platform
> which don't support nv, and want to make sure if this patch series
> affects the existed virtualization functions or not.
>
> Any suggestion about the test focus?
Not really. Given that the NV patches affect absolutely every
architectural parts of KVM/arm64, everything needs careful
testing. But more than testing, it needs reviewing.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>
Cc: "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@marvell.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"andre.przywara@arm.com" <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
George Cherian <gcherian@marvell.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Anil Kumar Reddy H <areddy3@marvell.com>,
"Dave.Martin@arm.com" <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 10:23:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86r1wus7df.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED342E29B9@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Hi Zengtao,
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:10:05 +0100,
"Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Marc:
>
> Since it's a very large patch series, I want to test it on my platform
> which don't support nv, and want to make sure if this patch series
> affects the existed virtualization functions or not.
>
> Any suggestion about the test focus?
Not really. Given that the NV patches affect absolutely every
architectural parts of KVM/arm64, everything needs careful
testing. But more than testing, it needs reviewing.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>
Cc: "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@marvell.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"suzuki.poulose@arm.com" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
"andre.przywara@arm.com" <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
"christoffer.dall@arm.com" <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
"jintack@cs.columbia.edu" <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>,
George Cherian <gcherian@marvell.com>,
"james.morse@arm.com" <james.morse@arm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Anil Kumar Reddy H <areddy3@marvell.com>,
"alexandru.elisei@arm.com" <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
"Dave.Martin@arm.com" <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
"julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com" <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 10:23:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86r1wus7df.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED342E29B9@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Hi Zengtao,
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:10:05 +0100,
"Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Marc:
>
> Since it's a very large patch series, I want to test it on my platform
> which don't support nv, and want to make sure if this patch series
> affects the existed virtualization functions or not.
>
> Any suggestion about the test focus?
Not really. Given that the NV patches affect absolutely every
architectural parts of KVM/arm64, everything needs careful
testing. But more than testing, it needs reviewing.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-11 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-03 7:27 [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support George Cherian
2020-04-03 7:27 ` George Cherian
2020-04-03 8:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-03 8:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-03 8:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-11 4:10 ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-11 4:10 ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-11 4:10 ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-11 9:23 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-04-11 9:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-11 9:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-16 1:38 ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-16 1:38 ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-16 1:38 ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-16 18:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-16 18:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-16 18:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-17 15:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-17 15:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-17 15:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-18 2:49 ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-18 2:49 ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-18 2:49 ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-20 14:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-20 14:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-20 14:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-21 2:22 ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-21 2:22 ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-21 2:22 ` Zengtao (B)
2020-04-17 15:11 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-04-17 15:11 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-04-17 15:11 ` Alexandru Elisei
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-04-03 9:36 George Cherian
2020-04-03 9:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-03 9:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-04-03 9:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-11 17:48 Marc Zyngier
2020-02-11 17:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-11 17:48 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86r1wus7df.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=areddy3@marvell.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=gcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=gkulkarni@marvell.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jintack@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.