All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <toshik@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt: bindings: add ath10k wireless device
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:21:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874mtjsegc.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5247714.HacITJUipJ@wuerfel> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:23:08 +0100")

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:

> On Friday 28 November 2014 11:54:39 Kalle Valo wrote:
>> 
>> Right now ath10k does not support that, but in the future we might want
>> to add mac address as well. We need to do some testing with the firmware
>> to make sure that we can safely change the "main" address from ath10k.
>
> This is from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet.txt:
>
> - local-mac-address: array of 6 bytes, specifies the MAC address that was
>   assigned to the network device;
> - mac-address: array of 6 bytes, specifies the MAC address that was last used by
>   the boot program; should be used in cases where the MAC address assigned to
>   the device by the boot program is different from the "local-mac-address"
>   property;
>
> If the address is fixed, you might still be able to use the local-mac-address
> property to communicate the main address. Normally you only have to pass
> the mac address in DT if the device itself doesn't know the address. Do you
> know where the main address is stored?

The ath10k main address is stored in the calibration data and the
firmware delivers the address to ath10k.

> If it's always known to the card, we don't need to pass it, and if the
> card doesn't know it, I suspect it would be safe to change it.

I suspect we can change the address afterwards, but I need to check to
be sure.

>> And because of Virtual AP (mBSSID) feature we actually would need to
>> provide multiple addresses, not just one. Maybe with addr_mask like
>> struct wiphy has?
>> 
>>  * @perm_addr: permanent MAC address of this device
>>  * @addr_mask: If the device supports multiple MAC addresses by masking,
>>  *      set this to a mask with variable bits set to 1, e.g. if the last
>>  *      four bits are variable then set it to 00-00-00-00-00-0f. The actual
>>  *      variable bits shall be determined by the interfaces added, with
>>  *      interfaces not matching the mask being rejected to be brought up.
>> 
>>         /* permanent MAC address(es) */
>>         u8 perm_addr[ETH_ALEN];
>>         u8 addr_mask[ETH_ALEN];
>
> We don't have a common binding for this yet, I think drivers that do this
> at the moment just know how many addresses they are allowed to take.
>
> If the mask is generally considered useful, we could probably add that to
> the binding though.

Currently ath10k supports up to 8 Virtual APs but the manufacturer can
choose to allocate any number of MAC addresses (1-8). Something like
addr_mask would be good way to inform ath10k what address range it has
available.

-- 
Kalle Valo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo-A+ZNKFmMK5xy9aJCnZT0Uw@public.gmane.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
Cc: ath10k-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	toshik-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt: bindings: add ath10k wireless device
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:21:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874mtjsegc.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5247714.HacITJUipJ@wuerfel> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:23:08 +0100")

Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org> writes:

> On Friday 28 November 2014 11:54:39 Kalle Valo wrote:
>> 
>> Right now ath10k does not support that, but in the future we might want
>> to add mac address as well. We need to do some testing with the firmware
>> to make sure that we can safely change the "main" address from ath10k.
>
> This is from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet.txt:
>
> - local-mac-address: array of 6 bytes, specifies the MAC address that was
>   assigned to the network device;
> - mac-address: array of 6 bytes, specifies the MAC address that was last used by
>   the boot program; should be used in cases where the MAC address assigned to
>   the device by the boot program is different from the "local-mac-address"
>   property;
>
> If the address is fixed, you might still be able to use the local-mac-address
> property to communicate the main address. Normally you only have to pass
> the mac address in DT if the device itself doesn't know the address. Do you
> know where the main address is stored?

The ath10k main address is stored in the calibration data and the
firmware delivers the address to ath10k.

> If it's always known to the card, we don't need to pass it, and if the
> card doesn't know it, I suspect it would be safe to change it.

I suspect we can change the address afterwards, but I need to check to
be sure.

>> And because of Virtual AP (mBSSID) feature we actually would need to
>> provide multiple addresses, not just one. Maybe with addr_mask like
>> struct wiphy has?
>> 
>>  * @perm_addr: permanent MAC address of this device
>>  * @addr_mask: If the device supports multiple MAC addresses by masking,
>>  *      set this to a mask with variable bits set to 1, e.g. if the last
>>  *      four bits are variable then set it to 00-00-00-00-00-0f. The actual
>>  *      variable bits shall be determined by the interfaces added, with
>>  *      interfaces not matching the mask being rejected to be brought up.
>> 
>>         /* permanent MAC address(es) */
>>         u8 perm_addr[ETH_ALEN];
>>         u8 addr_mask[ETH_ALEN];
>
> We don't have a common binding for this yet, I think drivers that do this
> at the moment just know how many addresses they are allowed to take.
>
> If the mask is generally considered useful, we could probably add that to
> the binding though.

Currently ath10k supports up to 8 Virtual APs but the manufacturer can
choose to allocate any number of MAC addresses (1-8). Something like
addr_mask would be good way to inform ath10k what address range it has
available.

-- 
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	toshik@chromium.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt: bindings: add ath10k wireless device
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:21:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874mtjsegc.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5247714.HacITJUipJ@wuerfel> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Fri, 28 Nov 2014 11:23:08 +0100")

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:

> On Friday 28 November 2014 11:54:39 Kalle Valo wrote:
>> 
>> Right now ath10k does not support that, but in the future we might want
>> to add mac address as well. We need to do some testing with the firmware
>> to make sure that we can safely change the "main" address from ath10k.
>
> This is from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet.txt:
>
> - local-mac-address: array of 6 bytes, specifies the MAC address that was
>   assigned to the network device;
> - mac-address: array of 6 bytes, specifies the MAC address that was last used by
>   the boot program; should be used in cases where the MAC address assigned to
>   the device by the boot program is different from the "local-mac-address"
>   property;
>
> If the address is fixed, you might still be able to use the local-mac-address
> property to communicate the main address. Normally you only have to pass
> the mac address in DT if the device itself doesn't know the address. Do you
> know where the main address is stored?

The ath10k main address is stored in the calibration data and the
firmware delivers the address to ath10k.

> If it's always known to the card, we don't need to pass it, and if the
> card doesn't know it, I suspect it would be safe to change it.

I suspect we can change the address afterwards, but I need to check to
be sure.

>> And because of Virtual AP (mBSSID) feature we actually would need to
>> provide multiple addresses, not just one. Maybe with addr_mask like
>> struct wiphy has?
>> 
>>  * @perm_addr: permanent MAC address of this device
>>  * @addr_mask: If the device supports multiple MAC addresses by masking,
>>  *      set this to a mask with variable bits set to 1, e.g. if the last
>>  *      four bits are variable then set it to 00-00-00-00-00-0f. The actual
>>  *      variable bits shall be determined by the interfaces added, with
>>  *      interfaces not matching the mask being rejected to be brought up.
>> 
>>         /* permanent MAC address(es) */
>>         u8 perm_addr[ETH_ALEN];
>>         u8 addr_mask[ETH_ALEN];
>
> We don't have a common binding for this yet, I think drivers that do this
> at the moment just know how many addresses they are allowed to take.
>
> If the mask is generally considered useful, we could probably add that to
> the binding though.

Currently ath10k supports up to 8 Virtual APs but the manufacturer can
choose to allocate any number of MAC addresses (1-8). Something like
addr_mask would be good way to inform ath10k what address range it has
available.

-- 
Kalle Valo

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-28 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-27 12:08 [PATCH v4 0/2] ath10k: device tree support Kalle Valo
2014-11-27 12:08 ` Kalle Valo
2014-11-27 12:08 ` Kalle Valo
2014-11-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt: bindings: add ath10k wireless device Kalle Valo
2014-11-27 12:08   ` Kalle Valo
2014-11-27 12:08   ` Kalle Valo
2014-11-27 12:28   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-27 12:28     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-27 12:28     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28  9:54     ` Kalle Valo
2014-11-28  9:54       ` Kalle Valo
2014-11-28  9:54       ` Kalle Valo
2014-11-28 10:23       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 10:23         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 10:23         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 12:21         ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2014-11-28 12:21           ` Kalle Valo
2014-11-28 12:21           ` Kalle Valo
2014-11-27 12:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ath10k: read calibration data from Device Tree Kalle Valo
2014-11-27 12:09   ` Kalle Valo
2014-11-27 12:09   ` Kalle Valo
2014-12-08 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] ath10k: device tree support Kalle Valo
2014-12-08 15:33   ` Kalle Valo
2014-12-08 15:33   ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874mtjsegc.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
    --to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=toshik@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.