All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Pankaj Bharadiya" <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>,
	daniel@ffwll.ch, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	"Imre Deak" <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/18] drm/i915/display/sdvo: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN*
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:55:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875zdt1g65.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200406112800.23762-12-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>

On Mon, 06 Apr 2020, Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> wrote:
> struct drm_device specific drm_WARN* macros include device information
> in the backtrace, so we know what device the warnings originate from.
>
> Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c | 16 +++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c
> index e6306cbb7a3a..477465a9af90 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c
> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void intel_sdvo_debug_write(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, u8 cmd,
>  	else
>  		BUF_PRINT("(%02X)", cmd);
>  
> -	WARN_ON(pos >= sizeof(buffer) - 1);
> +	drm_WARN_ON(intel_sdvo->base.base.dev, pos >= sizeof(buffer) - 1);
>  #undef BUF_PRINT
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: W: %02X %s\n", SDVO_NAME(intel_sdvo), cmd, buffer);
> @@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static bool intel_sdvo_read_response(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo,
>  		BUF_PRINT(" %02X", ((u8 *)response)[i]);
>  	}
>  
> -	WARN_ON(pos >= sizeof(buffer) - 1);
> +	drm_WARN_ON(intel_sdvo->base.base.dev, pos >= sizeof(buffer) - 1);
>  #undef BUF_PRINT
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: R: %s\n", SDVO_NAME(intel_sdvo), buffer);
> @@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ static bool intel_sdvo_compute_avi_infoframe(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo,
>  					   HDMI_QUANTIZATION_RANGE_FULL);
>  
>  	ret = hdmi_avi_infoframe_check(frame);
> -	if (WARN_ON(ret))
> +	if (drm_WARN_ON(intel_sdvo->base.base.dev, ret))
>  		return false;
>  
>  	return true;
> @@ -1123,11 +1123,12 @@ static bool intel_sdvo_set_avi_infoframe(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo,
>  	     intel_hdmi_infoframe_enable(HDMI_INFOFRAME_TYPE_AVI)) == 0)
>  		return true;
>  
> -	if (WARN_ON(frame->any.type != HDMI_INFOFRAME_TYPE_AVI))
> +	if (drm_WARN_ON(intel_sdvo->base.base.dev,
> +			frame->any.type != HDMI_INFOFRAME_TYPE_AVI))
>  		return false;
>  
>  	len = hdmi_infoframe_pack_only(frame, sdvo_data, sizeof(sdvo_data));
> -	if (WARN_ON(len < 0))
> +	if (drm_WARN_ON(intel_sdvo->base.base.dev, len < 0))

For most places, but especially places like this, I'd rather you added a
i915 local variable and used &i915->drm instead.

BR,
Jani.


>  		return false;
>  
>  	return intel_sdvo_write_infoframe(intel_sdvo, SDVO_HBUF_INDEX_AVI_IF,
> @@ -1257,7 +1258,8 @@ static void i9xx_adjust_sdvo_tv_clock(struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
>  		clock->m1 = 12;
>  		clock->m2 = 8;
>  	} else {
> -		WARN(1, "SDVO TV clock out of range: %i\n", dotclock);
> +		drm_WARN(pipe_config->uapi.crtc->dev, 1,
> +			 "SDVO TV clock out of range: %i\n", dotclock);
>  	}
>  
>  	pipe_config->clock_set = true;
> @@ -2294,7 +2296,7 @@ intel_sdvo_connector_atomic_get_property(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  				return 0;
>  			}
>  
> -		WARN_ON(1);
> +		drm_WARN_ON(connector->dev, 1);
>  		*val = 0;
>  	} else if (property == intel_sdvo_connector->top ||
>  		   property == intel_sdvo_connector->bottom)

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Pankaj Bharadiya" <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>,
	daniel@ffwll.ch, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	"Imre Deak" <imre.deak@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/18] drm/i915/display/sdvo: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN*
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:55:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875zdt1g65.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200406112800.23762-12-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>

On Mon, 06 Apr 2020, Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> wrote:
> struct drm_device specific drm_WARN* macros include device information
> in the backtrace, so we know what device the warnings originate from.
>
> Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c | 16 +++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c
> index e6306cbb7a3a..477465a9af90 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c
> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void intel_sdvo_debug_write(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo, u8 cmd,
>  	else
>  		BUF_PRINT("(%02X)", cmd);
>  
> -	WARN_ON(pos >= sizeof(buffer) - 1);
> +	drm_WARN_ON(intel_sdvo->base.base.dev, pos >= sizeof(buffer) - 1);
>  #undef BUF_PRINT
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: W: %02X %s\n", SDVO_NAME(intel_sdvo), cmd, buffer);
> @@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static bool intel_sdvo_read_response(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo,
>  		BUF_PRINT(" %02X", ((u8 *)response)[i]);
>  	}
>  
> -	WARN_ON(pos >= sizeof(buffer) - 1);
> +	drm_WARN_ON(intel_sdvo->base.base.dev, pos >= sizeof(buffer) - 1);
>  #undef BUF_PRINT
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: R: %s\n", SDVO_NAME(intel_sdvo), buffer);
> @@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ static bool intel_sdvo_compute_avi_infoframe(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo,
>  					   HDMI_QUANTIZATION_RANGE_FULL);
>  
>  	ret = hdmi_avi_infoframe_check(frame);
> -	if (WARN_ON(ret))
> +	if (drm_WARN_ON(intel_sdvo->base.base.dev, ret))
>  		return false;
>  
>  	return true;
> @@ -1123,11 +1123,12 @@ static bool intel_sdvo_set_avi_infoframe(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo,
>  	     intel_hdmi_infoframe_enable(HDMI_INFOFRAME_TYPE_AVI)) == 0)
>  		return true;
>  
> -	if (WARN_ON(frame->any.type != HDMI_INFOFRAME_TYPE_AVI))
> +	if (drm_WARN_ON(intel_sdvo->base.base.dev,
> +			frame->any.type != HDMI_INFOFRAME_TYPE_AVI))
>  		return false;
>  
>  	len = hdmi_infoframe_pack_only(frame, sdvo_data, sizeof(sdvo_data));
> -	if (WARN_ON(len < 0))
> +	if (drm_WARN_ON(intel_sdvo->base.base.dev, len < 0))

For most places, but especially places like this, I'd rather you added a
i915 local variable and used &i915->drm instead.

BR,
Jani.


>  		return false;
>  
>  	return intel_sdvo_write_infoframe(intel_sdvo, SDVO_HBUF_INDEX_AVI_IF,
> @@ -1257,7 +1258,8 @@ static void i9xx_adjust_sdvo_tv_clock(struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
>  		clock->m1 = 12;
>  		clock->m2 = 8;
>  	} else {
> -		WARN(1, "SDVO TV clock out of range: %i\n", dotclock);
> +		drm_WARN(pipe_config->uapi.crtc->dev, 1,
> +			 "SDVO TV clock out of range: %i\n", dotclock);
>  	}
>  
>  	pipe_config->clock_set = true;
> @@ -2294,7 +2296,7 @@ intel_sdvo_connector_atomic_get_property(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  				return 0;
>  			}
>  
> -		WARN_ON(1);
> +		drm_WARN_ON(connector->dev, 1);
>  		*val = 0;
>  	} else if (property == intel_sdvo_connector->top ||
>  		   property == intel_sdvo_connector->bottom)

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-21  6:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-06 11:27 [PATCH 00/18] Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 01/18] drm/i915/display/icl_dsi: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 18:08   ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 18:08     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 18:08     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 02/18] drm/i915/display/atomic_plane: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 03/18] drm/i915/display/ddi: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 20:21   ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 20:21     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 20:21     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 04/18] drm/i915/display/display: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 05/18] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-21  7:53   ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-21  9:19     ` Imre Deak
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 06/18] drm/i915/display/dp: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-21  6:56   ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-21  6:56     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 07/18] drm/i915/display/dpll_mgr: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915/display/frontbuffer: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 09/18] drm/i915/display/global_state: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 10/18] drm/i915/display/overlay: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 11/18] drm/i915/display/sdvo: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-21  6:55   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2020-04-21  6:55     ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 12/18] drm/i915/display/tc: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-21  6:57   ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-21  6:57     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 13/18] drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 22:41   ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 14/18] drm/i915/gem: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-21  8:30   ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 15/18] drm/i915/i915_drv: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-21  8:24   ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-21  8:24     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2020-04-21  9:59     ` Bharadiya,Pankaj
2020-04-21  9:59       ` [Intel-gfx] " Bharadiya,Pankaj
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 16/18] drm/i915/pmu: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 17/18] drm/i915/pm: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-21  8:26   ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-21  8:26     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2020-04-06 11:28 ` [PATCH 18/18] drm/i915/runtime_pm: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:28   ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-21  8:28   ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-21  9:48     ` Imre Deak
2020-04-06 11:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2020-04-06 12:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-04-06 14:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* (rev2) Patchwork
2020-04-06 15:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-04-06 19:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-04-21  8:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/18] Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Jani Nikula
2020-04-21 10:01   ` Bharadiya,Pankaj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875zdt1g65.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.