From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: bqiang@codeaurora.org
Cc: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>,
ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ath11k: change return buffer manager for QCA6390
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 17:10:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6jnftq9.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43fd66ccc28fe80b3ef00e5f1c7e6fbb@codeaurora.org> (bqiang's message of "Wed, 29 Sep 2021 10:42:43 +0800")
bqiang@codeaurora.org writes:
> On 2021-09-28 23:14, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org> writes:
>>
>>> From: Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>
>>>
>>> QCA6390 firmware uses HAL_RX_BUF_RBM_SW1_BM, not
>>> HAL_RX_BUF_RBM_SW3_BM.
>>>
>>> Tested-on: QCA6390 hw2.0 PCI
>>> WLAN.HST.1.0.1-01740-QCAHSTSWPLZ_V2_TO_X86-1
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> Same question as in patch 1, does this fix a bug or is just a
>> theoretical issue found during code review?
>
> Yes, this patch did fix a bug.
>
> QCA6390 firmware expects some specific packets from WBM2SW1 ring,
> which, however, will not happen because they are routed directly to
> host through WBM2SW3 ring due to wrong configuration of RBM.
What specific packets exactly?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: bqiang@codeaurora.org
Cc: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>,
ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ath11k: change return buffer manager for QCA6390
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 17:10:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6jnftq9.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43fd66ccc28fe80b3ef00e5f1c7e6fbb@codeaurora.org> (bqiang's message of "Wed, 29 Sep 2021 10:42:43 +0800")
bqiang@codeaurora.org writes:
> On 2021-09-28 23:14, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org> writes:
>>
>>> From: Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>
>>>
>>> QCA6390 firmware uses HAL_RX_BUF_RBM_SW1_BM, not
>>> HAL_RX_BUF_RBM_SW3_BM.
>>>
>>> Tested-on: QCA6390 hw2.0 PCI
>>> WLAN.HST.1.0.1-01740-QCAHSTSWPLZ_V2_TO_X86-1
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> Same question as in patch 1, does this fix a bug or is just a
>> theoretical issue found during code review?
>
> Yes, this patch did fix a bug.
>
> QCA6390 firmware expects some specific packets from WBM2SW1 ring,
> which, however, will not happen because they are routed directly to
> host through WBM2SW3 ring due to wrong configuration of RBM.
What specific packets exactly?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
--
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-05 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-14 16:37 [PATCH 1/3] ath11k: Change number of TCL rings to one for QCA6390 Jouni Malinen
2021-09-14 16:37 ` Jouni Malinen
2021-09-14 16:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] ath11k: change return buffer manager " Jouni Malinen
2021-09-14 16:37 ` Jouni Malinen
2021-09-16 10:02 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-16 10:02 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-28 15:09 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-28 15:09 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-28 15:14 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-28 15:14 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-29 2:42 ` bqiang
2021-09-29 2:42 ` bqiang
2021-10-01 6:26 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-01 6:26 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-05 14:10 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2021-10-05 14:10 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-25 13:02 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-25 13:02 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-25 13:03 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-25 13:03 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-14 16:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] ath11k: set correct NL80211_FEATURE_DYNAMIC_SMPS for WCN6855 Jouni Malinen
2021-09-14 16:37 ` Jouni Malinen
2021-09-16 10:08 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-16 10:08 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-16 14:09 ` Wen Gong
2021-09-16 14:09 ` Wen Gong
2021-09-16 15:15 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-16 15:15 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-28 10:07 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-28 10:07 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-29 2:30 ` Wen Gong
2021-10-29 2:30 ` Wen Gong
2021-11-01 14:13 ` Kalle Valo
2021-11-01 14:13 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-28 15:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] ath11k: Change number of TCL rings to one for QCA6390 Kalle Valo
2021-09-28 15:12 ` Kalle Valo
2021-09-29 2:15 ` bqiang
2021-09-29 2:15 ` bqiang
2021-10-05 14:06 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-05 14:06 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-11 15:12 ` Kalle Valo
2021-10-11 15:12 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a6jnftq9.fsf@codeaurora.org \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=bqiang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jouni@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.