All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Benjamin Berg <benjamin@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>,
	"Thiagarajan, Vasanthakumar" <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com>,
	"ath10k @ lists . infradead . org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
	"michal.kazior@tieto.com" <michal.kazior@tieto.com>,
	Mathias Kretschmer <mathias.kretschmer@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Add missing CONFIG_ATH10K_DEBUGFS check
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 12:29:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a8fafywg.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160912141105.24085-1-benjamin@sipsolutions.net> (Benjamin Berg's message of "Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:11:05 +0200")

Benjamin Berg <benjamin@sipsolutions.net> writes:

> The patch "ath10k: allow setting coverage class" was missing a check for
> CONFIG_ATH10K_DEBUGFS so it would try to use non-existing struct elements
> in some configurations. Fix this by adding the appropriate ifdef.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin@sipsolutions.net>
> ---
>
> Sorry, so turns out the kbuild test robot is correct and I forgot the ifd=
ef
> to check for CONFIG_ATH10K_DEBUGFS, so here a fixup commit for it.
>
> Other than that everything looks good to me in the pending branch.

Thanks, I folded this to the original patch in the pending branch.

--=20
Kalle Valo=

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Benjamin Berg <benjamin@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>,
	"Thiagarajan, Vasanthakumar" <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ath10k @ lists . infradead . org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
	Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com>,
	"michal.kazior@tieto.com" <michal.kazior@tieto.com>,
	Mathias Kretschmer <mathias.kretschmer@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Add missing CONFIG_ATH10K_DEBUGFS check
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 12:29:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a8fafywg.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160912141105.24085-1-benjamin@sipsolutions.net> (Benjamin Berg's message of "Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:11:05 +0200")

Benjamin Berg <benjamin@sipsolutions.net> writes:

> The patch "ath10k: allow setting coverage class" was missing a check for
> CONFIG_ATH10K_DEBUGFS so it would try to use non-existing struct elements
> in some configurations. Fix this by adding the appropriate ifdef.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin@sipsolutions.net>
> ---
>
> Sorry, so turns out the kbuild test robot is correct and I forgot the ifdef
> to check for CONFIG_ATH10K_DEBUGFS, so here a fixup commit for it.
>
> Other than that everything looks good to me in the pending branch.

Thanks, I folded this to the original patch in the pending branch.

-- 
Kalle Valo
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-14 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-29 14:45 [PATCHv3 0/5] ath10k: Allow setting coverage class and rx cleanups Benjamin Berg
2016-08-29 14:45 ` [PATCHv3 1/5] ath10k: Move ath10k_hw_params definition to hw.h Benjamin Berg
2016-09-13 12:32   ` [PATCHv3,1/5] " Kalle Valo
2016-08-29 14:45 ` [PATCHv3 2/5] ath10k: Add provision for Rx descriptor abstraction Benjamin Berg
2016-08-29 14:45 ` [PATCHv3 3/5] ath10k: Properly remove padding from the start of rx payload Benjamin Berg
2016-08-29 14:45 ` [PATCHv3 4/5] ath10k: Remove 4-addr padding related hw_param configuration Benjamin Berg
2016-08-29 14:45 ` [PATCHv3 5/5] ath10k: Allow setting coverage class Benjamin Berg
2016-09-13 12:14   ` Valo, Kalle
2016-09-14 16:32     ` [PATCH] ath10k: Fix spinlock use in coverage class hack Benjamin Berg
2016-09-14 16:32       ` Benjamin Berg
2016-09-30 12:58       ` Valo, Kalle
2016-09-30 12:58         ` Valo, Kalle
2016-10-04 15:04   ` [PATCHv3,5/5] ath10k: Allow setting coverage class Kalle Valo
2016-09-09 14:59 ` [PATCHv3 0/5] ath10k: Allow setting coverage class and rx cleanups Valo, Kalle
2016-09-09 14:59   ` Valo, Kalle
2016-09-12 14:11   ` [PATCH] ath10k: Add missing CONFIG_ATH10K_DEBUGFS check Benjamin Berg
2016-09-12 14:11     ` Benjamin Berg
2016-09-14 12:29     ` Valo, Kalle [this message]
2016-09-14 12:29       ` Valo, Kalle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a8fafywg.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
    --to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=benjamin@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.kretschmer@fit.fraunhofer.de \
    --cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
    --cc=s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com \
    --cc=sw@simonwunderlich.de \
    --cc=vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.