From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>, DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/51] drm: add managed resources tied to drm_device Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 11:22:34 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <87blpfqffp.fsf@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uEYxM8BAsp+DHUxw+qdE_B3J+ePAxC-j0V+v+J6trffgw@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, 29 Feb 2020, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:17 PM Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote: >> The header-check infrastructure was dropped again - see: >> fcbb8461fd2376ba3782b5b8bd440c929b8e4980 > > Uh I'm disappoint :-/ To say the least. I thought it was a good *opt-in* feature for whoever wanted it. But the part that got the backlash was applying it to absolutely everything under include/. And then it got removed altogether. From one extreme to the other. Nuts. > Adding Jani in case he missed this too. I guess maybe we should > resurrect it for drm again (and with a file pattern starting in a > .dot). We have a local implementation in i915/Makefile again. It uses 'find' to find the headers which is fine in i915, but the parameters need to be adjusted for drm to not be recursive. -maxdepth 1 or something. Also need to add another local config option. Sad trombone. >> > > > + /** >> > > > + * @managed: >> > > > + * >> > > > + * Managed resources linked to the lifetime of this &drm_device as >> > > > + * tracked by @ref. >> > > > + */ >> > > > + struct { >> > > > + struct list_head resources; >> > > > + void *final_kfree; >> > > > + spinlock_t lock; >> > > > + } managed; >> > > >> > > I am missing kernel-doc here. >> > > At least document that lock is used to guard access to resources. >> > > (s/lock/lock_resources/ ?) >> > >> > Dunno why, but the support for name sub-structures seems to have >> > broken in kerneldoc. So I can type it, but it's not showing up, so I >> > didn't bother. Well I had it, but deleted it again. It's still >> > documented to work, but I have no idea what I'm doing wrong. >> >> Most readers prefer the .c files as the source. >> I personally read the generated kernel doc when I google >> and when I check that my own stuff looks good in kernel-doc format. >> So comments are still valueable despite not being picked up by >> kernel-doc. >> You know this - but I just wanted to encourage you to write the few >> lines that may help me and others :-) > > Hm I thought way back this actually worked. Again ping for Jani, he's > better on top of what's happening in kernel-doc land. I haven't really been all that active lately, but I think the syntax here would be e.g. "@managed.resources:". BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>, DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/51] drm: add managed resources tied to drm_device Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 11:22:34 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <87blpfqffp.fsf@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uEYxM8BAsp+DHUxw+qdE_B3J+ePAxC-j0V+v+J6trffgw@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, 29 Feb 2020, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:17 PM Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote: >> The header-check infrastructure was dropped again - see: >> fcbb8461fd2376ba3782b5b8bd440c929b8e4980 > > Uh I'm disappoint :-/ To say the least. I thought it was a good *opt-in* feature for whoever wanted it. But the part that got the backlash was applying it to absolutely everything under include/. And then it got removed altogether. From one extreme to the other. Nuts. > Adding Jani in case he missed this too. I guess maybe we should > resurrect it for drm again (and with a file pattern starting in a > .dot). We have a local implementation in i915/Makefile again. It uses 'find' to find the headers which is fine in i915, but the parameters need to be adjusted for drm to not be recursive. -maxdepth 1 or something. Also need to add another local config option. Sad trombone. >> > > > + /** >> > > > + * @managed: >> > > > + * >> > > > + * Managed resources linked to the lifetime of this &drm_device as >> > > > + * tracked by @ref. >> > > > + */ >> > > > + struct { >> > > > + struct list_head resources; >> > > > + void *final_kfree; >> > > > + spinlock_t lock; >> > > > + } managed; >> > > >> > > I am missing kernel-doc here. >> > > At least document that lock is used to guard access to resources. >> > > (s/lock/lock_resources/ ?) >> > >> > Dunno why, but the support for name sub-structures seems to have >> > broken in kerneldoc. So I can type it, but it's not showing up, so I >> > didn't bother. Well I had it, but deleted it again. It's still >> > documented to work, but I have no idea what I'm doing wrong. >> >> Most readers prefer the .c files as the source. >> I personally read the generated kernel doc when I google >> and when I check that my own stuff looks good in kernel-doc format. >> So comments are still valueable despite not being picked up by >> kernel-doc. >> You know this - but I just wanted to encourage you to write the few >> lines that may help me and others :-) > > Hm I thought way back this actually worked. Again ping for Jani, he's > better on top of what's happening in kernel-doc land. I haven't really been all that active lately, but I think the syntax here would be e.g. "@managed.resources:". BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-02 9:22 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 228+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-02-27 18:14 [PATCH 00/51] drm managed resources, v3 Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 01/51] mm/sl[uo]b: export __kmalloc_track(_node)_caller Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 02/51] drm/i915: Don't clear drvdata in ->release Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 03/51] drm: add managed resources tied to drm_device Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 22:45 ` Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-28 22:45 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-28 23:14 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 23:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-29 11:17 ` Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-29 11:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-29 11:28 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-29 11:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-03-02 9:22 ` Jani Nikula [this message] 2020-03-02 9:22 ` Jani Nikula 2020-03-02 9:36 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-03-02 9:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-03-02 9:36 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-03-02 9:39 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-03-02 9:39 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-03-02 16:34 ` Sam Ravnborg 2020-03-02 16:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 04/51] drm: Set final_kfree in drm_dev_alloc Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Xen-devel] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 05/51] drm/mipi_dbi: Use drmm_add_final_kfree in all drivers Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 20:55 ` Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-27 20:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 06/51] drm/udl: Use drmm_add_final_kfree Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 20:57 ` Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-27 20:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 07/51] drm/qxl: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 08/51] drm/i915: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 09/51] drm/cirrus: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 21:01 ` Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-27 21:01 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-27 21:01 ` Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 10/51] drm/v3d: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 11/51] drm/tidss: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 12/51] drm/mcde: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 13/51] drm/vgem: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 21:02 ` Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-27 21:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 14/51] drm/vkms: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:59 ` Rodrigo Siqueira 2020-02-27 18:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rodrigo Siqueira 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 15/51] drm/repaper: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 16/51] drm/inigenic: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-03-02 20:12 ` Paul Cercueil 2020-03-02 20:12 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul Cercueil 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 17/51] drm/gm12u320: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 18/51] drm/<drivers>: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:35 ` Liviu Dudau 2020-02-27 18:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Liviu Dudau 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 19/51] drm: Cleanups after drmm_add_final_kfree rollout Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 20/51] drm: Handle dev->unique with drmm_ Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 21/51] drm: Use drmm_ for drm_dev_init cleanup Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 22/51] drm: manage drm_minor cleanup with drmm_ Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 23/51] drm: Manage drm_gem_init " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 24/51] drm: Manage drm_vblank_cleanup " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 25/51] drm: Garbage collect drm_dev_fini Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 26/51] drm: Manage drm_mode_config_init with drmm_ Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 7:30 ` Thomas Zimmermann 2020-02-28 7:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann 2020-02-28 8:43 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 8:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 9:56 ` Thomas Zimmermann 2020-02-28 9:56 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann 2020-02-28 20:26 ` Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-28 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-28 23:11 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 23:11 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-29 10:59 ` Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-29 10:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sam Ravnborg 2020-03-02 14:09 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-03-02 14:09 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 27/51] drm/bochs: Remove leftover drm_atomic_helper_shutdown Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [PATCH 28/51] drm/bochs: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:14 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 29/51] drm/cirrus: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 20:32 ` Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-28 20:32 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-28 20:32 ` Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 30/51] drm/cirrus: Fully embrace devm_ Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 31/51] drm/ingenic: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-03-02 20:13 ` Paul Cercueil 2020-03-02 20:13 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul Cercueil 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 32/51] drm/mcde: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 33/51] drm/mcde: More devm_drm_dev_init Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 34/51] drm/meson: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 35/51] drm/pl111: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 36/51] drm/rcar-du: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 37/51] drm/rockchip: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 21:19 ` kbuild test robot 2020-02-28 21:19 ` kbuild test robot 2020-02-28 21:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " kbuild test robot 2020-02-28 21:19 ` kbuild test robot 2020-02-28 21:19 ` kbuild test robot 2020-02-28 23:34 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 23:34 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 23:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 23:34 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 23:34 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-29 1:53 ` kbuild test robot 2020-02-29 1:53 ` kbuild test robot 2020-02-29 1:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " kbuild test robot 2020-02-29 1:53 ` kbuild test robot 2020-02-29 1:53 ` kbuild test robot 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 38/51] drm/stm: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 39/51] drm/shmob: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 40/51] drm/mtk: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 41/51] drm/tidss: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 42/51] drm/gm12u320: More drmm_ Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 43/51] drm/gm12u320: Use devm_drm_dev_init Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 44/51] drm/gm12u320: Use helpers for shutdown/suspend/resume Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 45/51] drm/gm12u320: Simplify upload work Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 19:04 ` Hans de Goede 2020-02-27 19:04 ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 46/51] drm/repaper: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 47/51] drm/mipi-dbi: Move drm_mode_config_init into mipi library Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 20:34 ` Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-28 20:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 48/51] drm/mipi-dbi: Drop explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup call Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 20:36 ` Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-28 20:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 49/51] drm/udl: " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 20:37 ` Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-28 20:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 50/51] drm/udl: drop drm_driver.release hook Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 7:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann 2020-02-28 7:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann 2020-02-28 8:40 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 8:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 11:46 ` Thomas Zimmermann 2020-02-28 11:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann 2020-02-28 17:43 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-28 17:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-03-02 8:14 ` Thomas Zimmermann 2020-03-02 8:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Zimmermann 2020-03-02 9:01 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-03-02 9:01 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [PATCH 51/51] drm: Add docs for managed resources Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 18:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2020-02-27 20:53 ` Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-27 20:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sam Ravnborg 2020-02-27 22:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm managed resources, v3 Patchwork 2020-02-27 22:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork 2020-02-27 23:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2020-02-29 5:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2020-03-23 14:48 [PATCH 00/51] drm_device managed resources, v5 Daniel Vetter 2020-03-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 03/51] drm: add managed resources tied to drm_device Daniel Vetter 2020-03-23 18:36 ` Sam Ravnborg 2020-03-02 22:25 [PATCH 00/51] drm_device managed resources, v4 Daniel Vetter 2020-03-02 22:25 ` [PATCH 03/51] drm: add managed resources tied to drm_device Daniel Vetter 2020-03-03 8:04 ` Dan Carpenter 2020-03-03 8:04 ` Dan Carpenter 2020-03-03 8:04 ` Dan Carpenter 2020-03-03 8:25 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-03-03 8:25 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-03-11 9:07 ` Thomas Zimmermann 2020-03-11 9:47 ` Thomas Zimmermann 2020-03-16 8:45 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-03-11 9:14 ` Thomas Zimmermann 2020-03-16 8:50 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-21 21:02 [PATCH 00/51] drm managed resources, v2 Daniel Vetter 2020-02-21 21:02 ` [PATCH 03/51] drm: add managed resources tied to drm_device Daniel Vetter 2020-02-25 10:27 ` Andrzej Hajda 2020-02-25 15:03 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-26 9:21 ` Andrzej Hajda 2020-02-26 10:21 ` Daniel Vetter 2020-02-26 14:38 ` Andrzej Hajda
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=87blpfqffp.fsf@intel.com \ --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \ --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \ --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \ --cc=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \ --cc=rafael@kernel.org \ --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.