From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> To: Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com> Cc: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>, "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>, "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, "shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>, "s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>, "kw@linux.com" <kw@linux.com>, "bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>, Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>, "jdmason@kudzu.us" <jdmason@kudzu.us>, "kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>, "festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>, dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>, "kishon@ti.com" <kishon@ti.com>, "lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, "ntb@lists.linux.dev" <ntb@lists.linux.dev>, "lznuaa@gmail.com" <lznuaa@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] irqchip: imx mu worked as msi controller Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:58:46 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <87czd1vq61.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <PAXPR04MB918614DF535DA7FBADC956F988699@PAXPR04MB9186.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> On Sun, 14 Aug 2022 04:12:01 +0100, Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com> wrote: > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000000000..bb111412d598f > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c > > > @@ -0,0 +1,443 @@ > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > > > +/* > > > + * NXP MU worked as MSI controller > > > > Freescale? Or NXP? Please make up your mind. > > > [Frank Li] NXP and freescale is the same thing. > It is mux used at many place. Pick one, and stick to it. Having two names for the same thing is pointlessly confusing. > > > +static struct irq_chip imx_mu_msi_irq_chip = { > > > + .name = "MU-MSI", > > > + .irq_ack = irq_chip_ack_parent, > > > > Crucially, no irq_write_msi_msg callback. So we happily inherit > > platform_msi_write_msg() and use the per descriptor write_msg() > > callback. Who sets this? Nobody. > > [Frank Li] when set flag MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS, > irq_write_msi_msg callback will be set at function platform_msi_update_chip_ops(); That wasn't my question. But never mind, I found the call to platform_msi_domain_alloc_irqs() in patch #4. > > > + > > > + /* Initialize MSI domain parent */ > > > + msi_data->parent = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnodes, > > > + IMX_MU_CHANS, > > > + &imx_mu_msi_domain_ops, > > > + msi_data); > > > > Consider setting the bus_token attribute for this domain to something > > that isn't the default, as it otherwise clashes with the following > > creation. > > [Frank Li] Any suggestion? Which bus_token is good? DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS is what other drivers use. > > > + priv->pd_a = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(dev, "a"); > > > > I'm sorry, but you'll have to come up with something slightly more > > descriptive than "a" or "b". At least add a qualifier to it. Same > > thing for the DT by the way. > > [Frank Li] MU spec using term "A side" and "B side". So I think "a" and "b" > is enough. No, it really isn't. > > Or do you think "a-side" is better? No, I would like something fully descriptive. The DT actually has "Processor A-facing", which seems like a reasonable description. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> To: Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com> Cc: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>, "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>, "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, "shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>, "s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>, "kw@linux.com" <kw@linux.com>, "bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>, Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>, "jdmason@kudzu.us" <jdmason@kudzu.us>, "kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>, "festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>, dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>, "kishon@ti.com" <kishon@ti.com>, "lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, "ntb@lists.linux.dev" <ntb@lists.linux.dev>, "lznuaa@gmail.com" <lznuaa@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] irqchip: imx mu worked as msi controller Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:58:46 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <87czd1vq61.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <PAXPR04MB918614DF535DA7FBADC956F988699@PAXPR04MB9186.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> On Sun, 14 Aug 2022 04:12:01 +0100, Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com> wrote: > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000000000..bb111412d598f > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c > > > @@ -0,0 +1,443 @@ > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > > > +/* > > > + * NXP MU worked as MSI controller > > > > Freescale? Or NXP? Please make up your mind. > > > [Frank Li] NXP and freescale is the same thing. > It is mux used at many place. Pick one, and stick to it. Having two names for the same thing is pointlessly confusing. > > > +static struct irq_chip imx_mu_msi_irq_chip = { > > > + .name = "MU-MSI", > > > + .irq_ack = irq_chip_ack_parent, > > > > Crucially, no irq_write_msi_msg callback. So we happily inherit > > platform_msi_write_msg() and use the per descriptor write_msg() > > callback. Who sets this? Nobody. > > [Frank Li] when set flag MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS, > irq_write_msi_msg callback will be set at function platform_msi_update_chip_ops(); That wasn't my question. But never mind, I found the call to platform_msi_domain_alloc_irqs() in patch #4. > > > + > > > + /* Initialize MSI domain parent */ > > > + msi_data->parent = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnodes, > > > + IMX_MU_CHANS, > > > + &imx_mu_msi_domain_ops, > > > + msi_data); > > > > Consider setting the bus_token attribute for this domain to something > > that isn't the default, as it otherwise clashes with the following > > creation. > > [Frank Li] Any suggestion? Which bus_token is good? DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS is what other drivers use. > > > + priv->pd_a = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(dev, "a"); > > > > I'm sorry, but you'll have to come up with something slightly more > > descriptive than "a" or "b". At least add a qualifier to it. Same > > thing for the DT by the way. > > [Frank Li] MU spec using term "A side" and "B side". So I think "a" and "b" > is enough. No, it really isn't. > > Or do you think "a-side" is better? No, I would like something fully descriptive. The DT actually has "Processor A-facing", which seems like a reasonable description. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-15 8:58 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-08-12 21:52 [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI EP driver support MSI doorbell from host Frank Li 2022-08-12 21:52 ` Frank Li 2022-08-12 21:52 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] irqchip: allow pass down .pm field at IRQCHIP_PLATFORM_DRIVER_END Frank Li 2022-08-12 21:52 ` Frank Li 2022-08-12 21:52 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] irqchip: imx mu worked as msi controller Frank Li 2022-08-12 21:52 ` Frank Li 2022-08-13 9:19 ` Marc Zyngier 2022-08-13 9:19 ` Marc Zyngier 2022-08-14 3:12 ` [EXT] " Frank Li 2022-08-14 3:12 ` Frank Li 2022-08-15 8:58 ` Marc Zyngier [this message] 2022-08-15 8:58 ` Marc Zyngier 2022-08-13 11:57 ` Marc Zyngier 2022-08-13 11:57 ` Marc Zyngier 2022-08-14 2:53 ` [EXT] " Frank Li 2022-08-14 2:53 ` Frank Li 2022-08-12 21:52 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: irqchip: imx mu work " Frank Li 2022-08-12 21:52 ` Frank Li 2022-08-14 20:41 ` Rob Herring 2022-08-14 20:41 ` Rob Herring 2022-08-12 21:52 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] pcie: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: add endpoint MSI support Frank Li 2022-08-12 21:52 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=87czd1vq61.wl-maz@kernel.org \ --to=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \ --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=festevam@gmail.com \ --cc=frank.li@nxp.com \ --cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \ --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \ --cc=kishon@ti.com \ --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \ --cc=kw@linux.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \ --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \ --cc=lznuaa@gmail.com \ --cc=ntb@lists.linux.dev \ --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \ --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.