From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] mac80211: Add airtime accounting and scheduling to TXQs
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 11:30:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h8gzpy9t.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d8415fe50e8505eb62c5a0d1b40bb2a@codeaurora.org>
Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@codeaurora.org> writes:
> On 2018-10-28 15:01, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote:
>> On 2018-10-28 08:48, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>> Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@codeaurora.org> writes:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 4ms 223 (40%) 214 (40%) 109 (10%) 94 (10%)
>>>>
>>>> 4ms 337 (90%) 182 (8%) 23 (1%) 30 (1%)
>>>
>>> So this looks like it's doing *something*, but not like it's
>>> succeeding
>>> in achieving the set percentages. Did you check if the actual airtime
>>> values (in debugfs) corresponds to the configured weights?
>>>
>> No. Will check that.
>>
> Toke,
>
> From above results, different airtime for each station is reflecting on
> output performance. Unfortunately I don't see such tput difference, when
> the tx mode is fixed in push-only. Even low weight station is giving
> same
> performance. Are you also seeing the same behavior in your setup? Could
> you please share your results?
Sorry, I've been travelling this week; I'll be back in the office next
week and can run some tests then. I may also have an idea for a
different algorithm that will work better in pull mode, but need to see
if it works at all first :)
How do I force ath10k into push mode?
-Toke
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] mac80211: Add airtime accounting and scheduling to TXQs
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 11:30:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h8gzpy9t.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d8415fe50e8505eb62c5a0d1b40bb2a@codeaurora.org>
Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@codeaurora.org> writes:
> On 2018-10-28 15:01, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote:
>> On 2018-10-28 08:48, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>> Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@codeaurora.org> writes:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 4ms 223 (40%) 214 (40%) 109 (10%) 94 (10%)
>>>>
>>>> 4ms 337 (90%) 182 (8%) 23 (1%) 30 (1%)
>>>
>>> So this looks like it's doing *something*, but not like it's
>>> succeeding
>>> in achieving the set percentages. Did you check if the actual airtime
>>> values (in debugfs) corresponds to the configured weights?
>>>
>> No. Will check that.
>>
> Toke,
>
> From above results, different airtime for each station is reflecting on
> output performance. Unfortunately I don't see such tput difference, when
> the tx mode is fixed in push-only. Even low weight station is giving
> same
> performance. Are you also seeing the same behavior in your setup? Could
> you please share your results?
Sorry, I've been travelling this week; I'll be back in the office next
week and can run some tests then. I may also have an idea for a
different algorithm that will work better in pull mode, but need to see
if it works at all first :)
How do I force ath10k into push mode?
-Toke
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-02 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-20 11:05 [PATCH 0/6] Move TXQ scheduling and airtime fairness into mac80211 Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-20 11:05 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-20 11:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] mac80211: Add TXQ scheduling API Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-20 11:05 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-11-09 12:00 ` Johannes Berg
2018-11-09 12:00 ` Johannes Berg
2018-11-09 12:39 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-11-09 12:39 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-10-20 11:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] cfg80211: Add airtime statistics and settings Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-20 11:05 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-20 11:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] mac80211: Add airtime accounting and scheduling to TXQs Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-20 11:05 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-26 14:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-10-26 14:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-10-26 23:04 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-26 23:04 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-28 15:48 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-10-28 15:48 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-10-28 22:01 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-28 22:01 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-29 23:50 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-29 23:50 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-11-02 10:30 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2018-11-02 10:30 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-11-05 8:39 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-11-05 8:39 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-11-07 14:53 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-11-07 14:53 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-11-07 22:35 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-11-07 22:35 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-11-08 13:46 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-11-08 13:46 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-10-31 6:17 ` yiboz
2018-10-31 6:17 ` yiboz
2018-10-20 11:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] ath9k: Switch to mac80211 TXQ scheduling and airtime APIs Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-20 11:05 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-20 11:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] ath10k: migrate to mac80211 txq scheduling Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-20 11:05 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-24 8:33 ` Kalle Valo
2018-10-24 8:33 ` Kalle Valo
2018-10-24 18:55 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-24 18:55 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-20 11:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] ath10k: reporting estimated tx airtime for fairness Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-20 11:05 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2018-10-24 8:35 ` Kalle Valo
2018-10-24 8:35 ` Kalle Valo
2018-10-21 11:27 ` [PATCH 0/6] Move TXQ scheduling and airtime fairness into mac80211 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2018-10-21 11:27 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h8gzpy9t.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmanohar@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.