All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Deming Wang <wangdeming@inspur.com>, shuah@kernel.org
Cc: Deming Wang <wangdeming@inspur.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/powerpc: Replace obsolete memalign() with posix_memalign()
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 22:02:50 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7nti9zp.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230412111237.2007-1-wangdeming@inspur.com>

Deming Wang <wangdeming@inspur.com> writes:
> memalign() is obsolete according to its manpage.
>
> Replace memalign() with posix_memalign() and remove malloc.h include
> that was there for memalign().
>
> As a pointer is passed into posix_memalign(), initialize *s to NULL
> to silence a warning about the function's return value being used as
> uninitialized (which is not valid anyway because the error is properly
> checked before p is returned).

The patch doesn't do that. There is no p?

I think you've copied the change log for a whole bunch of commits but
not updated them to be accurate for each change?

cheers

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/strlen.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/strlen.c
> index 9055ebc484d0..f9c1f9cc2d32 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/strlen.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/strlen.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> -#include <malloc.h>
>  #include <stdlib.h>
>  #include <string.h>
>  #include <time.h>
> @@ -51,10 +50,11 @@ static void bench_test(char *s)
>  static int testcase(void)
>  {
>  	char *s;
> +	int ret;
>  	unsigned long i;
>  
> -	s = memalign(128, SIZE);
> -	if (!s) {
> +	ret = posix_memalign((void **)&s, 128, SIZE);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
>  		perror("memalign");
>  		exit(1);
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.27.0

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Deming Wang <wangdeming@inspur.com>, shuah@kernel.org
Cc: npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Deming Wang <wangdeming@inspur.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/powerpc: Replace obsolete memalign() with posix_memalign()
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 22:02:50 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7nti9zp.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230412111237.2007-1-wangdeming@inspur.com>

Deming Wang <wangdeming@inspur.com> writes:
> memalign() is obsolete according to its manpage.
>
> Replace memalign() with posix_memalign() and remove malloc.h include
> that was there for memalign().
>
> As a pointer is passed into posix_memalign(), initialize *s to NULL
> to silence a warning about the function's return value being used as
> uninitialized (which is not valid anyway because the error is properly
> checked before p is returned).

The patch doesn't do that. There is no p?

I think you've copied the change log for a whole bunch of commits but
not updated them to be accurate for each change?

cheers

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/strlen.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/strlen.c
> index 9055ebc484d0..f9c1f9cc2d32 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/strlen.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/strlen.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> -#include <malloc.h>
>  #include <stdlib.h>
>  #include <string.h>
>  #include <time.h>
> @@ -51,10 +50,11 @@ static void bench_test(char *s)
>  static int testcase(void)
>  {
>  	char *s;
> +	int ret;
>  	unsigned long i;
>  
> -	s = memalign(128, SIZE);
> -	if (!s) {
> +	ret = posix_memalign((void **)&s, 128, SIZE);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
>  		perror("memalign");
>  		exit(1);
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.27.0

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-12 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-12 11:12 [PATCH] selftests/powerpc: Replace obsolete memalign() with posix_memalign() Deming Wang
2023-04-12 11:12 ` Deming Wang
2023-04-12 12:02 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2023-04-12 12:02   ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-13  1:02 Deming Wang
2023-04-13  1:02 ` Deming Wang
2023-04-28  8:09 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-04-28  8:09   ` Muhammad Usama Anjum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o7nti9zp.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=wangdeming@inspur.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.