From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> To: balbi@ti.com Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com>, Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>, Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, alan@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 13:53:11 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <87oblhmu6g.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20120907054932.GB3136@arwen.pp.htv.fi> (Felipe Balbi's message of "Fri, 7 Sep 2012 08:49:34 +0300") Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> writes: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:44:13PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> writes: >> >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > here's v4 of the omap uart patchset. No changes other than a rebase on top of >> > Greg's tty-next branch and Tony's Acked-by being added to a couple patches >> > >> > Note: I'm resending the series with Vikram's Software Flow Control fix anyway >> > as it can just be ignored if it's decided it needs to go into this merge >> > window. >> >> Sorry to be late to the party... just getting back from some time off. >> >> I'm assuming that this was not tested with PM, so decided I better do it > > you assumed wrong. See the previous versions of the series and you'll > see I mention all the basic pm testing I did. My apologies for not reading the previous versions. I don't think it's unusual that a reviewer should expect everything he to know about a series (including how it was tested) is in the cover letter or in the changelogs of the latest series. I don't expect to have to look through all the previous versions for this kind of info. Since I wasn't around to review/test the earlier versions, I just looked at the latest (v4) and didn't see any mention of testing of any sort in the cover letter. Looking back at the previous cover letters, I don't see any description of the PM testing either. I only see it was tested on pandaboard. Since mainline doesn't have full PM support for OMAP4, testing on panda doesn't really test UART PM at all. Could you please point me to the descriptions in earlier mails of how you did PM testing, and on what platforms? In addition, IMO, if this was only tested on Panda (as suggested by earlier cover letters), it really should not have been merged until it got some broader testing. >> myself seeing that Greg is has already merge it. To test, I merged >> Greg's tty-next branch with v3.6-rc4 and did some PM testing. >> >> The bad news is that it doesn't even compile (see reply to [PATCH v4 >> 20/21]). > > yeah, that was an automerge issue when rebasing on greg's tty-next > branch, plus me assuming omap serial was already enabled on my .config > and not checking the compile output. Sent a patch now. As I reported in my reply to [PATCH v4 20/21], that patch also had another problem where it introduced a new (but unused) field. Maybe another rebase problem? I see the same problem in v3 and v4. >> Also, there is a big WARNING on boot[1], which seems to be triggered by >> a new check added for v3.6-rc3[2]. This appears to be introduced by >> $SUBJECT series, because I don't see it on vanilla v3.6-rc4. [...] > This doesn't seem to be caused by $SUBJECT at all. See that we are > calling uart_add_one_port() which will call tty_port_register_device() > which, in turn, will call tty_port_link_device() and that will set > driver->ports[index] correctly. > > Have you checked if this doesn't happen without my series before waving > your blame hammer ? FWIW, that part of the code wasn't change by > $SUBJECT at all. Whoa. This was only test report. No need to get personal. All I said is that it "seemed" to introduced by $SUBJECT series. Hardly waiving "blame hammer." And yes, I did check without your series. As I reported above, the warning didn't exist with v3.6-rc4, and it did with yesterday's tty-next branch. The WARNING pointed a finger at ttyO (omap-serial) so I assumed it was in $SUBJECT series. Testing with todays tty-next, the problem is gone. The patch 'tty_register_device_attr updated for tty-next'[1] seems to have made the problem go away. So it's now clear that it wasn't introduced by $SUBJECT series. My bad. Yesterday, it wasn't that obvious, so I made an assumption in order to report a problem uncovered in my testing in the hopes that it would be helpful to you in fixing a potential problem. My assumption was wrong, I was wrong. I'm wrong a lot, and I'm OK with that. The bug was elsewhere, and is already fixed. My apologies if it seemed like I was blaming you. Kevin [1] Author: Tomas Hlavacek <tmshlvck@gmail.com> 2012-09-06 14:17:47 Committer: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 2012-09-06 14:40:18 Parent: 6915c0e487c822e2436683e14302c0b8a6155cc7 (tty: uartclk value from serial_core exposed to sysfs) Child: e36851d0fa94b0f7802b3cc80406dbd3ef4f2f16 (serial: omap: fix compile breakage) Branch: tmp/uart-test-2 Follows: v3.6-rc3 Precedes: tty_register_device_attr updated for tty-next Added tty_device_create_release() and bound to dev->release in tty_register_device_attr(). Added tty_port_register_device_attr() and used in uart_add_one_port() instead of tty_register_device_attr(). Signed-off-by: Tomas Hlavacek <tmshlvck@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@deeprootsystems.com (Kevin Hilman) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 13:53:11 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <87oblhmu6g.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20120907054932.GB3136@arwen.pp.htv.fi> (Felipe Balbi's message of "Fri, 7 Sep 2012 08:49:34 +0300") Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> writes: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:44:13PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> writes: >> >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > here's v4 of the omap uart patchset. No changes other than a rebase on top of >> > Greg's tty-next branch and Tony's Acked-by being added to a couple patches >> > >> > Note: I'm resending the series with Vikram's Software Flow Control fix anyway >> > as it can just be ignored if it's decided it needs to go into this merge >> > window. >> >> Sorry to be late to the party... just getting back from some time off. >> >> I'm assuming that this was not tested with PM, so decided I better do it > > you assumed wrong. See the previous versions of the series and you'll > see I mention all the basic pm testing I did. My apologies for not reading the previous versions. I don't think it's unusual that a reviewer should expect everything he to know about a series (including how it was tested) is in the cover letter or in the changelogs of the latest series. I don't expect to have to look through all the previous versions for this kind of info. Since I wasn't around to review/test the earlier versions, I just looked at the latest (v4) and didn't see any mention of testing of any sort in the cover letter. Looking back at the previous cover letters, I don't see any description of the PM testing either. I only see it was tested on pandaboard. Since mainline doesn't have full PM support for OMAP4, testing on panda doesn't really test UART PM at all. Could you please point me to the descriptions in earlier mails of how you did PM testing, and on what platforms? In addition, IMO, if this was only tested on Panda (as suggested by earlier cover letters), it really should not have been merged until it got some broader testing. >> myself seeing that Greg is has already merge it. To test, I merged >> Greg's tty-next branch with v3.6-rc4 and did some PM testing. >> >> The bad news is that it doesn't even compile (see reply to [PATCH v4 >> 20/21]). > > yeah, that was an automerge issue when rebasing on greg's tty-next > branch, plus me assuming omap serial was already enabled on my .config > and not checking the compile output. Sent a patch now. As I reported in my reply to [PATCH v4 20/21], that patch also had another problem where it introduced a new (but unused) field. Maybe another rebase problem? I see the same problem in v3 and v4. >> Also, there is a big WARNING on boot[1], which seems to be triggered by >> a new check added for v3.6-rc3[2]. This appears to be introduced by >> $SUBJECT series, because I don't see it on vanilla v3.6-rc4. [...] > This doesn't seem to be caused by $SUBJECT at all. See that we are > calling uart_add_one_port() which will call tty_port_register_device() > which, in turn, will call tty_port_link_device() and that will set > driver->ports[index] correctly. > > Have you checked if this doesn't happen without my series before waving > your blame hammer ? FWIW, that part of the code wasn't change by > $SUBJECT at all. Whoa. This was only test report. No need to get personal. All I said is that it "seemed" to introduced by $SUBJECT series. Hardly waiving "blame hammer." And yes, I did check without your series. As I reported above, the warning didn't exist with v3.6-rc4, and it did with yesterday's tty-next branch. The WARNING pointed a finger at ttyO (omap-serial) so I assumed it was in $SUBJECT series. Testing with todays tty-next, the problem is gone. The patch 'tty_register_device_attr updated for tty-next'[1] seems to have made the problem go away. So it's now clear that it wasn't introduced by $SUBJECT series. My bad. Yesterday, it wasn't that obvious, so I made an assumption in order to report a problem uncovered in my testing in the hopes that it would be helpful to you in fixing a potential problem. My assumption was wrong, I was wrong. I'm wrong a lot, and I'm OK with that. The bug was elsewhere, and is already fixed. My apologies if it seemed like I was blaming you. Kevin [1] Author: Tomas Hlavacek <tmshlvck@gmail.com> 2012-09-06 14:17:47 Committer: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 2012-09-06 14:40:18 Parent: 6915c0e487c822e2436683e14302c0b8a6155cc7 (tty: uartclk value from serial_core exposed to sysfs) Child: e36851d0fa94b0f7802b3cc80406dbd3ef4f2f16 (serial: omap: fix compile breakage) Branch: tmp/uart-test-2 Follows: v3.6-rc3 Precedes: tty_register_device_attr updated for tty-next Added tty_device_create_release() and bound to dev->release in tty_register_device_attr(). Added tty_port_register_device_attr() and used in uart_add_one_port() instead of tty_register_device_attr(). Signed-off-by: Tomas Hlavacek <tmshlvck@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-07 20:53 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 219+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-08-23 10:32 [PATCH v3 00/23] OMAP UART patches Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 01/23] serial: omap: define and use to_uart_omap_port() Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-24 19:07 ` Tony Lindgren 2012-08-24 19:07 ` Tony Lindgren 2012-08-24 19:07 ` Tony Lindgren 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 02/23] serial: omap: define helpers for pdata function pointers Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 03/23] serial: omap: don't access the platform_device Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-24 19:07 ` Tony Lindgren 2012-08-24 19:07 ` Tony Lindgren 2012-08-24 19:07 ` Tony Lindgren 2012-09-05 20:27 ` Greg KH 2012-09-05 20:27 ` Greg KH 2012-09-05 20:27 ` Greg KH 2012-09-06 12:29 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:29 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:29 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 01/21] serial: omap: don't access the platform_device Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 02/21] serial: omap: drop DMA support Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 03/21] serial: add OMAP-specific defines Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 04/21] serial: omap: simplify IRQ handling Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 05/21] serial: omap: refactor receive_chars() into rdi/rlsi handlers Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 06/21] serial: omap: move THRE check to transmit_chars() Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 07/21] serial: omap: stick to put_autosuspend Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 08/21] serial: omap: set dev->drvdata before enabling pm_runtime Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 09/21] serial: omap: drop unnecessary check from remove Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 10/21] serial: omap: make sure to suspend device before remove Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 11/21] serial: omap: don't save IRQ flags on hardirq Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 12/21] serial: omap: fix sequence of pm_runtime_* calls Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 13/21] serial: omap: optimization with section annotations Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 14/21] serial: omap: drop "inline" from IRQ handler prototype Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 15/21] serial: omap: unlock the port lock Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 16/21] serial: omap: implement set_wake Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 17/21] serial: omap: make sure to put() on poll_get_char Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 18/21] serial: omap: fix software flow control Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 19/21] serial: omap: remove unnecessary header and add a missing one Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 20/21] serial: omap: move uart_omap_port definition to C file Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 21:58 ` Kevin Hilman 2012-09-06 21:58 ` Kevin Hilman 2012-09-06 21:58 ` Kevin Hilman 2012-09-06 12:45 ` [PATCH v4 21/21] serial: omap: enable RX and TX FIFO usage Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 16:18 ` [PATCH v4 00/21] OMAP UART Patches Greg KH 2012-09-06 16:18 ` Greg KH 2012-09-06 16:18 ` Greg KH 2012-09-06 17:25 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 17:25 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 17:25 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 21:37 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-06 21:37 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-06 21:37 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-11 22:02 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-11 22:02 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-11 22:02 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-12 6:23 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-12 6:23 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-12 6:23 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-12 20:25 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-12 20:25 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-12 20:25 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-13 5:01 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-13 5:01 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-13 5:01 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-16 1:22 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-16 1:22 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-16 1:22 ` Paul Walmsley 2012-09-16 18:36 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-16 18:36 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-16 18:36 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 22:44 ` Kevin Hilman 2012-09-06 22:44 ` Kevin Hilman 2012-09-06 22:44 ` Kevin Hilman 2012-09-07 5:49 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-07 5:49 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-07 5:49 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-07 20:53 ` Kevin Hilman [this message] 2012-09-07 20:53 ` Kevin Hilman 2012-09-07 20:53 ` Kevin Hilman 2012-09-08 19:04 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-08 19:04 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-08 19:04 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-11 11:31 ` Shubhrajyoti 2012-09-11 11:31 ` Shubhrajyoti 2012-09-11 11:31 ` Shubhrajyoti 2012-09-11 11:54 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-11 11:54 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-11 11:54 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 04/23] serial: omap: drop DMA support Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 05/23] serial: add OMAP-specific defines Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 06/23] serial: omap: simplify IRQ handling Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 07/23] serial: omap: refactor receive_chars() into rdi/rlsi handlers Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 08/23] serial: omap: move THRE check to transmit_chars() Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 09/23] serial: omap: stick to put_autosuspend Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 10/23] serial: omap: set dev->drvdata before enabling pm_runtime Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 11/23] serial: omap: drop unnecessary check from remove Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 12/23] serial: omap: make sure to suspend device before remove Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 13/23] serial: omap: don't save IRQ flags on hardirq Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 14/23] serial: omap: fix sequence of pm_runtime_* calls Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 15/23] serial: omap: optimization with section annotations Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 16/23] serial: omap: drop "inline" from IRQ handler prototype Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 17/23] serial: omap: unlock the port lock Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 18/23] serial: omap: implement set_wake Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` [PATCH v3 19/23] serial: omap: make sure to put() on poll_get_char Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:32 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 20/23] serial: omap: fix software flow control Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:33 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:33 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-24 19:08 ` Tony Lindgren 2012-08-24 19:08 ` Tony Lindgren 2012-08-24 19:08 ` Tony Lindgren 2012-09-05 20:27 ` Greg KH 2012-09-05 20:27 ` Greg KH 2012-09-05 20:27 ` Greg KH 2012-09-06 12:31 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:31 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-06 12:31 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 21/23] serial: omap: remove unnecessary header and add a missing one Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:33 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:33 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 22/23] serial: omap: move uart_omap_port definition to C file Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:33 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:33 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-24 19:08 ` Tony Lindgren 2012-08-24 19:08 ` Tony Lindgren 2012-08-24 19:08 ` Tony Lindgren 2012-08-23 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 23/23] serial: omap: enable RX and TX FIFO usage Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:33 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-23 10:33 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-24 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 00/23] OMAP UART patches Felipe Balbi 2012-08-24 10:40 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-08-24 10:40 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-04 11:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-04 11:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-04 11:45 ` Felipe Balbi 2012-09-05 20:18 ` Greg KH 2012-09-05 20:18 ` Greg KH 2012-09-05 20:18 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=87oblhmu6g.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \ --to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \ --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \ --cc=balbi@ti.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \ --cc=shubhrajyoti@ti.com \ --cc=sourav.poddar@ti.com \ --cc=tony@atomide.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.