All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	"Ben Widawsky" <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	linuxarm@huawei.com,
	"Shameerali Kolothum Thodi"
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
	"Saransh Gupta1" <saransh@ibm.com>,
	"Shreyas Shah" <shreyas.shah@elastics.cloud>,
	"Chris Browy" <cbrowy@avery-design.com>,
	"Samarth Saxena" <samarths@cadence.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/42] hw/cxl/device: Implement basic mailbox (8.2.8.4)
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:22:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmoebagl.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220124171705.10432-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>


Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> writes:

> From: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
>
> This is the beginning of implementing mailbox support for CXL 2.0
> devices. The implementation recognizes when the doorbell is rung,
> handles the command/payload, clears the doorbell while returning error
> codes and data.
>
> Generally the mailbox mechanism is designed to permit communication
> between the host OS and the firmware running on the device. For our
> purposes, we emulate both the firmware, implemented primarily in
> cxl-mailbox-utils.c, and the hardware.
>
> No commands are implemented yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
>  hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c   | 129 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c  | 201 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  hw/cxl/meson.build          |   1 +
>  include/hw/cxl/cxl.h        |   3 +
>  include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h |  29 +++++-
>  5 files changed, 358 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> index cb1b0a8217..c9ada7ee94 100644
> --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,115 @@ static uint64_t dev_reg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, unsigned size)
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static uint64_t mailbox_reg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, unsigned size)
> +{
> +    CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate = opaque;
> +
> +    switch (size) {
> +    case 1:
> +        return cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state[offset];
> +    case 2:
> +        return cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state16[offset / 2];
> +    case 4:
> +        return cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state32[offset / 4];
> +    case 8:
> +        return cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state64[offset / 8];
> +    default:
> +        g_assert_not_reached();
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static void mailbox_mem_writel(uint32_t *reg_state, hwaddr offset,
> +                               uint64_t value)
> +{
> +    switch (offset) {
> +    case A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL:
> +        /* fallthrough */
> +    case A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CAP:
> +        /* RO register */
> +        break;
> +    default:
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
> +                      "%s Unexpected 32-bit access to 0x%" PRIx64 " (WI)\n",
> +                      __func__, offset);
> +        break;

The log message implies WI but it isn't. Did you want an early return?

> +    }
> +
> +    reg_state[offset / 4] = value;
> +}
> +
> +static void mailbox_mem_writeq(uint64_t *reg_state, hwaddr offset,
> +                               uint64_t value)
> +{
> +    switch (offset) {
> +    case A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD:
> +        break;
> +    case A_CXL_DEV_BG_CMD_STS:
> +        /* BG not supported */
> +        /* fallthrough */
> +    case A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_STS:
> +        /* Read only register, will get updated by the state machine */
> +        return;
> +    default:
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
> +                      "%s Unexpected 64-bit access to 0x%" PRIx64 " (WI)\n",
> +                      __func__, offset);
> +        return;

which is the behaviour here.

> +    }
> +
> +
> +    reg_state[offset / 8] = value;
> +}
> +
> +static void mailbox_reg_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value,
> +                              unsigned size)
> +{
> +    CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate = opaque;
> +
> +    if (offset >= A_CXL_DEV_CMD_PAYLOAD) {
> +        memcpy(cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state + offset, &value, size);
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Lock is needed to prevent concurrent writes as well as to prevent writes
> +     * coming in while the firmware is processing. Without background commands
> +     * or the second mailbox implemented, this serves no purpose since the
> +     * memory access is synchronized at a higher level (per memory region).
> +     */
> +    RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD();

RCU_READ_LOCK doesn't prevent concurrent writes, although the BQL should.

> +
> +    switch (size) {
> +    case 4:
> +        mailbox_mem_writel(cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state32, offset, value);
> +        break;
> +    case 8:
> +        mailbox_mem_writeq(cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state64, offset, value);
> +        break;
> +    default:
> +        g_assert_not_reached();
> +    }
> +
> +    if (ARRAY_FIELD_EX32(cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state32, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL,
> +                         DOORBELL))
> +        cxl_process_mailbox(cxl_dstate);
> +}
> +
> +static const MemoryRegionOps mailbox_ops = {
> +    .read = mailbox_reg_read,
> +    .write = mailbox_reg_write,
> +    .endianness = DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
> +    .valid = {
> +        .min_access_size = 1,
> +        .max_access_size = 8,
> +        .unaligned = false,
> +    },
> +    .impl = {
> +        .min_access_size = 1,
> +        .max_access_size = 8,
> +    },

with_attrs?

> +};
> +
>  static const MemoryRegionOps dev_ops = {
>      .read = dev_reg_read,
>      .write = NULL, /* status register is read only */
> @@ -80,20 +189,33 @@ void cxl_device_register_block_init(Object *obj, CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
>                            "cap-array", CXL_CAPS_SIZE);
>      memory_region_init_io(&cxl_dstate->device, obj, &dev_ops, cxl_dstate,
>                            "device-status", CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_LENGTH);
> +    memory_region_init_io(&cxl_dstate->mailbox, obj, &mailbox_ops, cxl_dstate,
> +                          "mailbox", CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH);
>  
>      memory_region_add_subregion(&cxl_dstate->device_registers, 0,
>                                  &cxl_dstate->caps);
>      memory_region_add_subregion(&cxl_dstate->device_registers,
>                                  CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_OFFSET,
>                                  &cxl_dstate->device);
> +    memory_region_add_subregion(&cxl_dstate->device_registers,
> +                                CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_OFFSET,
> +                                &cxl_dstate->mailbox);
>  }
>  
>  static void device_reg_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate) { }
>  
> +static void mailbox_reg_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> +{
> +    /* 2048 payload size, with no interrupt or background support */
> +    ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state32, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CAP,
> +                     PAYLOAD_SIZE, CXL_MAILBOX_PAYLOAD_SHIFT);
> +    cxl_dstate->payload_size = CXL_MAILBOX_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE;
> +}
> +
>  void cxl_device_register_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
>  {
>      uint32_t *cap_hdrs = cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state32;
> -    const int cap_count = 1;
> +    const int cap_count = 2;
>  
>      /* CXL Device Capabilities Array Register */
>      ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0);
> @@ -102,4 +224,9 @@ void cxl_device_register_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
>  
>      cxl_device_cap_init(cxl_dstate, DEVICE, 1);
>      device_reg_init_common(cxl_dstate);
> +
> +    cxl_device_cap_init(cxl_dstate, MAILBOX, 2);
> +    mailbox_reg_init_common(cxl_dstate);
> +
> +    assert(cxl_initialize_mailbox(cxl_dstate) == 0);
>  }
> diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..2854682cbe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
> +/*
> + * CXL Utility library for mailbox interface
> + *
> + * Copyright(C) 2020 Intel Corporation.
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2. See the
> + * COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> + */
> +
> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "hw/cxl/cxl.h"
> +#include "hw/pci/pci.h"
> +#include "qemu/log.h"
> +#include "qemu/uuid.h"
> +
> +/*
> + * How to add a new command, example. The command set FOO, with cmd BAR.
> + *  1. Add the command set and cmd to the enum.
> + *     FOO    = 0x7f,
> + *          #define BAR 0
> + *  2. Forward declare the handler.
> + *     declare_mailbox_handler(FOO_BAR);
> + *  3. Add the command to the cxl_cmd_set[][]
> + *     CXL_CMD(FOO, BAR, 0, 0),
> + *  4. Implement your handler
> + *     define_mailbox_handler(FOO_BAR) { ... return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS; }
> + *
> + *
> + *  Writing the handler:
> + *    The handler will provide the &struct cxl_cmd, the &CXLDeviceState, and the
> + *    in/out length of the payload. The handler is responsible for consuming the
> + *    payload from cmd->payload and operating upon it as necessary. It must then
> + *    fill the output data into cmd->payload (overwriting what was there),
> + *    setting the length, and returning a valid return code.
> + *
> + *  XXX: The handler need not worry about endianess. The payload is read out of
> + *  a register interface that already deals with it.
> + */
> +
> +/* 8.2.8.4.5.1 Command Return Codes */
> +typedef enum {
> +    CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS = 0x0,
> +    CXL_MBOX_BG_STARTED = 0x1,
> +    CXL_MBOX_INVALID_INPUT = 0x2,
> +    CXL_MBOX_UNSUPPORTED = 0x3,
> +    CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR = 0x4,
> +    CXL_MBOX_RETRY_REQUIRED = 0x5,
> +    CXL_MBOX_BUSY = 0x6,
> +    CXL_MBOX_MEDIA_DISABLED = 0x7,
> +    CXL_MBOX_FW_XFER_IN_PROGRESS = 0x8,
> +    CXL_MBOX_FW_XFER_OUT_OF_ORDER = 0x9,
> +    CXL_MBOX_FW_AUTH_FAILED = 0xa,
> +    CXL_MBOX_FW_INVALID_SLOT = 0xb,
> +    CXL_MBOX_FW_ROLLEDBACK = 0xc,
> +    CXL_MBOX_FW_REST_REQD = 0xd,
> +    CXL_MBOX_INVALID_HANDLE = 0xe,
> +    CXL_MBOX_INVALID_PA = 0xf,
> +    CXL_MBOX_INJECT_POISON_LIMIT = 0x10,
> +    CXL_MBOX_PERMANENT_MEDIA_FAILURE = 0x11,
> +    CXL_MBOX_ABORTED = 0x12,
> +    CXL_MBOX_INVALID_SECURITY_STATE = 0x13,
> +    CXL_MBOX_INCORRECT_PASSPHRASE = 0x14,
> +    CXL_MBOX_UNSUPPORTED_MAILBOX = 0x15,
> +    CXL_MBOX_INVALID_PAYLOAD_LENGTH = 0x16,
> +    CXL_MBOX_MAX = 0x17
> +} ret_code;
> +
> +struct cxl_cmd;
> +typedef ret_code (*opcode_handler)(struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
> +                                   CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate, uint16_t *len);
> +struct cxl_cmd {
> +    const char *name;
> +    opcode_handler handler;
> +    ssize_t in;
> +    uint16_t effect; /* Reported in CEL */
> +    uint8_t *payload;
> +};
> +
> +#define define_mailbox_handler(name)                \
> +    static ret_code cmd_##name(struct cxl_cmd *cmd, \
> +                               CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate, uint16_t *len)
> +#define declare_mailbox_handler(name) define_mailbox_handler(name)
> +
> +#define define_mailbox_handler_zeroed(name, size)                         \
> +    uint16_t __zero##name = size;                                         \
> +    static ret_code cmd_##name(struct cxl_cmd *cmd,                       \
> +                               CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate, uint16_t *len) \
> +    {                                                                     \
> +        *len = __zero##name;                                              \
> +        memset(cmd->payload, 0, *len);                                    \
> +        return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;                                          \
> +    }
> +#define define_mailbox_handler_const(name, data)                          \
> +    static ret_code cmd_##name(struct cxl_cmd *cmd,                       \
> +                               CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate, uint16_t *len) \
> +    {                                                                     \
> +        *len = sizeof(data);                                              \
> +        memcpy(cmd->payload, data, *len);                                 \
> +        return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;                                          \
> +    }
> +#define define_mailbox_handler_nop(name)                                  \
> +    static ret_code cmd_##name(struct cxl_cmd *cmd,                       \
> +                               CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate, uint16_t *len) \
> +    {                                                                     \
> +        return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;                                          \
> +    }
> +
> +#define CXL_CMD(s, c, in, cel_effect) \
> +    [s][c] = { stringify(s##_##c), cmd_##s##_##c, in, cel_effect }
> +
> +static struct cxl_cmd cxl_cmd_set[256][256] = {};
> +
> +#undef CXL_CMD
> +
> +QemuUUID cel_uuid;

static?

but really this seems more like something that should be in a property
of the device. Will it always be fixed or is it something the user might
want to tweak?

> +
> +void cxl_process_mailbox(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> +{
> +    uint16_t ret = CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
> +    struct cxl_cmd *cxl_cmd;
> +    uint64_t status_reg;
> +    opcode_handler h;
> +
> +    /*
> +     * current state of mailbox interface
> +     *  mbox_cap_reg = cxl_dstate->reg_state32[R_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CAP];
> +     *  mbox_ctrl_reg = cxl_dstate->reg_state32[R_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL];
> +     *  status_reg = *(uint64_t *)&cxl_dstate->reg_state[A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_STS];
> +     */
> +    uint64_t command_reg =
> +        *(uint64_t *)&cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state[A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD];
> +
> +    /* Check if we have to do anything */
> +    if (!ARRAY_FIELD_EX32(cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state32, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL,
> +                          DOORBELL)) {
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "Corrupt internal state for
> firmware\n");

is this actually UNIMP or has something gone wrong internally or is the
guest doing something wrong?

> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    uint8_t set = FIELD_EX64(command_reg, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, COMMAND_SET);
> +    uint8_t cmd = FIELD_EX64(command_reg, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, COMMAND);
> +    uint16_t len = FIELD_EX64(command_reg, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, LENGTH);
> +    cxl_cmd = &cxl_cmd_set[set][cmd];
> +    h = cxl_cmd->handler;
> +    if (!h) {
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "Command %04xh not implemented\n",
> +                                 set << 8 | cmd);
> +        goto handled;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (len != cxl_cmd->in) {
> +        ret = CXL_MBOX_INVALID_PAYLOAD_LENGTH;
> +    }
> +
> +    cxl_cmd->payload = cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state + A_CXL_DEV_CMD_PAYLOAD;
> +    ret = (*h)(cxl_cmd, cxl_dstate, &len);
> +    assert(len <= cxl_dstate->payload_size);
> +
> +handled:
> +    /*
> +     * Set the return code
> +     * XXX: it's a 64b register, but we're not setting the vendor, so we can get
> +     * away with this
> +     */
> +    status_reg = FIELD_DP64(0, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_STS, ERRNO, ret);
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Set the return length
> +     */
> +    command_reg = FIELD_DP64(command_reg, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, COMMAND_SET, 0);
> +    command_reg = FIELD_DP64(command_reg, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, COMMAND, 0);
> +    command_reg = FIELD_DP64(command_reg, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, LENGTH, len);
> +
> +    cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state64[A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD / 8] = command_reg;
> +    cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state64[A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_STS / 8] = status_reg;
> +
> +    /* Tell the host we're done */
> +    ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state32, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL,
> +                     DOORBELL, 0);
> +}
> +
> +int cxl_initialize_mailbox(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> +{
> +    const char *cel_uuidstr = "0da9c0b5-bf41-4b78-8f79-96b1623b3f17";

I'm curious as to where this magic number came from.

> +
> +    for (int set = 0; set < 256; set++) {
> +        for (int cmd = 0; cmd < 256; cmd++) {
> +            if (cxl_cmd_set[set][cmd].handler) {
> +                struct cxl_cmd *c = &cxl_cmd_set[set][cmd];
> +                struct cel_log *log =
> +                    &cxl_dstate->cel_log[cxl_dstate->cel_size];
> +
> +                log->opcode = (set << 8) | cmd;
> +                log->effect = c->effect;
> +                cxl_dstate->cel_size++;
> +            }
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    return qemu_uuid_parse(cel_uuidstr, &cel_uuid);
> +}
> diff --git a/hw/cxl/meson.build b/hw/cxl/meson.build
> index 47154d6850..0eca715d10 100644
> --- a/hw/cxl/meson.build
> +++ b/hw/cxl/meson.build
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>  softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_CXL', if_true: files(
>    'cxl-component-utils.c',
>    'cxl-device-utils.c',
> +  'cxl-mailbox-utils.c',
>  ))
> diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl.h
> index b9d1ac3fad..554ad93b6b 100644
> --- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -14,4 +14,7 @@
>  #include "cxl_component.h"
>  #include "cxl_device.h"
>  
> +#define CXL_COMPONENT_REG_BAR_IDX 0
> +#define CXL_DEVICE_REG_BAR_IDX 2
> +
>  #endif
> diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> index 4bdfa80eb4..b3aa248ee3 100644
> --- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> @@ -85,16 +85,28 @@ typedef struct cxl_device_state {
>      MemoryRegion device_registers;
>  
>      /* mmio for device capabilities array - 8.2.8.2 */
> +    MemoryRegion device;
>      struct {
>          MemoryRegion caps;
>          uint32_t caps_reg_state32[CXL_CAPS_SIZE / 4];
>      };
>  
> -    /* mmio for the device status registers 8.2.8.3 */
> -    MemoryRegion device;
> -

The above code motion should probably be squashed into the original patch 

>      /* mmio for the mailbox registers 8.2.8.4 */
> -    MemoryRegion mailbox;
> +    struct {
> +        MemoryRegion mailbox;
> +        uint16_t payload_size;
> +        union {
> +            uint8_t mbox_reg_state[CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH];
> +            uint16_t mbox_reg_state16[CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH / 2];
> +            uint32_t mbox_reg_state32[CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH / 4];
> +            uint64_t mbox_reg_state64[CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH / 8];
> +        };
> +        struct cel_log {
> +            uint16_t opcode;
> +            uint16_t effect;
> +        } cel_log[1 << 16];
> +        size_t cel_size;
> +    };
>  
>      /* memory region for persistent memory, HDM */
>      uint64_t pmem_size;
> @@ -137,6 +149,9 @@ CXL_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_HEADER_REGISTER(DEVICE, CXL_DEVICE_CAP_HDR1_OFFSET)
>  CXL_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_HEADER_REGISTER(MAILBOX, CXL_DEVICE_CAP_HDR1_OFFSET + \
>                                                 CXL_DEVICE_CAP_REG_SIZE)
>  
> +int cxl_initialize_mailbox(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate);
> +void cxl_process_mailbox(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate);
> +
>  #define cxl_device_cap_init(dstate, reg, cap_id)                           \
>      do {                                                                   \
>          uint32_t *cap_hdrs = dstate->caps_reg_state32;                     \
> @@ -165,6 +180,12 @@ REG32(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL, 4)
>      FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL, INT_EN, 1, 1)
>      FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL, BG_INT_EN, 2, 1)
>  
> +/* XXX: actually a 64b register */
> +REG32(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, 8)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, COMMAND, 0, 8)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, COMMAND_SET, 8, 8)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, LENGTH, 16, 20)
> +
>  /* XXX: actually a 64b register */
>  REG32(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_STS, 0x10)
>      FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_STS, BG_OP, 0, 1)


-- 
Alex Bennée

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Ben Widawsky" <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Samarth Saxena" <samarths@cadence.com>,
	"Chris Browy" <cbrowy@avery-design.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxarm@huawei.com, "Shreyas Shah" <shreyas.shah@elastics.cloud>,
	"Saransh Gupta1" <saransh@ibm.com>,
	"Shameerali Kolothum Thodi"
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel@redhat.com>,
	"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/42] hw/cxl/device: Implement basic mailbox (8.2.8.4)
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:22:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmoebagl.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220124171705.10432-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>


Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> writes:

> From: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
>
> This is the beginning of implementing mailbox support for CXL 2.0
> devices. The implementation recognizes when the doorbell is rung,
> handles the command/payload, clears the doorbell while returning error
> codes and data.
>
> Generally the mailbox mechanism is designed to permit communication
> between the host OS and the firmware running on the device. For our
> purposes, we emulate both the firmware, implemented primarily in
> cxl-mailbox-utils.c, and the hardware.
>
> No commands are implemented yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
>  hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c   | 129 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c  | 201 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  hw/cxl/meson.build          |   1 +
>  include/hw/cxl/cxl.h        |   3 +
>  include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h |  29 +++++-
>  5 files changed, 358 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> index cb1b0a8217..c9ada7ee94 100644
> --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,115 @@ static uint64_t dev_reg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, unsigned size)
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static uint64_t mailbox_reg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, unsigned size)
> +{
> +    CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate = opaque;
> +
> +    switch (size) {
> +    case 1:
> +        return cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state[offset];
> +    case 2:
> +        return cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state16[offset / 2];
> +    case 4:
> +        return cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state32[offset / 4];
> +    case 8:
> +        return cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state64[offset / 8];
> +    default:
> +        g_assert_not_reached();
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static void mailbox_mem_writel(uint32_t *reg_state, hwaddr offset,
> +                               uint64_t value)
> +{
> +    switch (offset) {
> +    case A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL:
> +        /* fallthrough */
> +    case A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CAP:
> +        /* RO register */
> +        break;
> +    default:
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
> +                      "%s Unexpected 32-bit access to 0x%" PRIx64 " (WI)\n",
> +                      __func__, offset);
> +        break;

The log message implies WI but it isn't. Did you want an early return?

> +    }
> +
> +    reg_state[offset / 4] = value;
> +}
> +
> +static void mailbox_mem_writeq(uint64_t *reg_state, hwaddr offset,
> +                               uint64_t value)
> +{
> +    switch (offset) {
> +    case A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD:
> +        break;
> +    case A_CXL_DEV_BG_CMD_STS:
> +        /* BG not supported */
> +        /* fallthrough */
> +    case A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_STS:
> +        /* Read only register, will get updated by the state machine */
> +        return;
> +    default:
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
> +                      "%s Unexpected 64-bit access to 0x%" PRIx64 " (WI)\n",
> +                      __func__, offset);
> +        return;

which is the behaviour here.

> +    }
> +
> +
> +    reg_state[offset / 8] = value;
> +}
> +
> +static void mailbox_reg_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value,
> +                              unsigned size)
> +{
> +    CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate = opaque;
> +
> +    if (offset >= A_CXL_DEV_CMD_PAYLOAD) {
> +        memcpy(cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state + offset, &value, size);
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Lock is needed to prevent concurrent writes as well as to prevent writes
> +     * coming in while the firmware is processing. Without background commands
> +     * or the second mailbox implemented, this serves no purpose since the
> +     * memory access is synchronized at a higher level (per memory region).
> +     */
> +    RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD();

RCU_READ_LOCK doesn't prevent concurrent writes, although the BQL should.

> +
> +    switch (size) {
> +    case 4:
> +        mailbox_mem_writel(cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state32, offset, value);
> +        break;
> +    case 8:
> +        mailbox_mem_writeq(cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state64, offset, value);
> +        break;
> +    default:
> +        g_assert_not_reached();
> +    }
> +
> +    if (ARRAY_FIELD_EX32(cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state32, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL,
> +                         DOORBELL))
> +        cxl_process_mailbox(cxl_dstate);
> +}
> +
> +static const MemoryRegionOps mailbox_ops = {
> +    .read = mailbox_reg_read,
> +    .write = mailbox_reg_write,
> +    .endianness = DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
> +    .valid = {
> +        .min_access_size = 1,
> +        .max_access_size = 8,
> +        .unaligned = false,
> +    },
> +    .impl = {
> +        .min_access_size = 1,
> +        .max_access_size = 8,
> +    },

with_attrs?

> +};
> +
>  static const MemoryRegionOps dev_ops = {
>      .read = dev_reg_read,
>      .write = NULL, /* status register is read only */
> @@ -80,20 +189,33 @@ void cxl_device_register_block_init(Object *obj, CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
>                            "cap-array", CXL_CAPS_SIZE);
>      memory_region_init_io(&cxl_dstate->device, obj, &dev_ops, cxl_dstate,
>                            "device-status", CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_LENGTH);
> +    memory_region_init_io(&cxl_dstate->mailbox, obj, &mailbox_ops, cxl_dstate,
> +                          "mailbox", CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH);
>  
>      memory_region_add_subregion(&cxl_dstate->device_registers, 0,
>                                  &cxl_dstate->caps);
>      memory_region_add_subregion(&cxl_dstate->device_registers,
>                                  CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_OFFSET,
>                                  &cxl_dstate->device);
> +    memory_region_add_subregion(&cxl_dstate->device_registers,
> +                                CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_OFFSET,
> +                                &cxl_dstate->mailbox);
>  }
>  
>  static void device_reg_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate) { }
>  
> +static void mailbox_reg_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> +{
> +    /* 2048 payload size, with no interrupt or background support */
> +    ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state32, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CAP,
> +                     PAYLOAD_SIZE, CXL_MAILBOX_PAYLOAD_SHIFT);
> +    cxl_dstate->payload_size = CXL_MAILBOX_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE;
> +}
> +
>  void cxl_device_register_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
>  {
>      uint32_t *cap_hdrs = cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state32;
> -    const int cap_count = 1;
> +    const int cap_count = 2;
>  
>      /* CXL Device Capabilities Array Register */
>      ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0);
> @@ -102,4 +224,9 @@ void cxl_device_register_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
>  
>      cxl_device_cap_init(cxl_dstate, DEVICE, 1);
>      device_reg_init_common(cxl_dstate);
> +
> +    cxl_device_cap_init(cxl_dstate, MAILBOX, 2);
> +    mailbox_reg_init_common(cxl_dstate);
> +
> +    assert(cxl_initialize_mailbox(cxl_dstate) == 0);
>  }
> diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..2854682cbe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
> +/*
> + * CXL Utility library for mailbox interface
> + *
> + * Copyright(C) 2020 Intel Corporation.
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2. See the
> + * COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> + */
> +
> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "hw/cxl/cxl.h"
> +#include "hw/pci/pci.h"
> +#include "qemu/log.h"
> +#include "qemu/uuid.h"
> +
> +/*
> + * How to add a new command, example. The command set FOO, with cmd BAR.
> + *  1. Add the command set and cmd to the enum.
> + *     FOO    = 0x7f,
> + *          #define BAR 0
> + *  2. Forward declare the handler.
> + *     declare_mailbox_handler(FOO_BAR);
> + *  3. Add the command to the cxl_cmd_set[][]
> + *     CXL_CMD(FOO, BAR, 0, 0),
> + *  4. Implement your handler
> + *     define_mailbox_handler(FOO_BAR) { ... return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS; }
> + *
> + *
> + *  Writing the handler:
> + *    The handler will provide the &struct cxl_cmd, the &CXLDeviceState, and the
> + *    in/out length of the payload. The handler is responsible for consuming the
> + *    payload from cmd->payload and operating upon it as necessary. It must then
> + *    fill the output data into cmd->payload (overwriting what was there),
> + *    setting the length, and returning a valid return code.
> + *
> + *  XXX: The handler need not worry about endianess. The payload is read out of
> + *  a register interface that already deals with it.
> + */
> +
> +/* 8.2.8.4.5.1 Command Return Codes */
> +typedef enum {
> +    CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS = 0x0,
> +    CXL_MBOX_BG_STARTED = 0x1,
> +    CXL_MBOX_INVALID_INPUT = 0x2,
> +    CXL_MBOX_UNSUPPORTED = 0x3,
> +    CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR = 0x4,
> +    CXL_MBOX_RETRY_REQUIRED = 0x5,
> +    CXL_MBOX_BUSY = 0x6,
> +    CXL_MBOX_MEDIA_DISABLED = 0x7,
> +    CXL_MBOX_FW_XFER_IN_PROGRESS = 0x8,
> +    CXL_MBOX_FW_XFER_OUT_OF_ORDER = 0x9,
> +    CXL_MBOX_FW_AUTH_FAILED = 0xa,
> +    CXL_MBOX_FW_INVALID_SLOT = 0xb,
> +    CXL_MBOX_FW_ROLLEDBACK = 0xc,
> +    CXL_MBOX_FW_REST_REQD = 0xd,
> +    CXL_MBOX_INVALID_HANDLE = 0xe,
> +    CXL_MBOX_INVALID_PA = 0xf,
> +    CXL_MBOX_INJECT_POISON_LIMIT = 0x10,
> +    CXL_MBOX_PERMANENT_MEDIA_FAILURE = 0x11,
> +    CXL_MBOX_ABORTED = 0x12,
> +    CXL_MBOX_INVALID_SECURITY_STATE = 0x13,
> +    CXL_MBOX_INCORRECT_PASSPHRASE = 0x14,
> +    CXL_MBOX_UNSUPPORTED_MAILBOX = 0x15,
> +    CXL_MBOX_INVALID_PAYLOAD_LENGTH = 0x16,
> +    CXL_MBOX_MAX = 0x17
> +} ret_code;
> +
> +struct cxl_cmd;
> +typedef ret_code (*opcode_handler)(struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
> +                                   CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate, uint16_t *len);
> +struct cxl_cmd {
> +    const char *name;
> +    opcode_handler handler;
> +    ssize_t in;
> +    uint16_t effect; /* Reported in CEL */
> +    uint8_t *payload;
> +};
> +
> +#define define_mailbox_handler(name)                \
> +    static ret_code cmd_##name(struct cxl_cmd *cmd, \
> +                               CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate, uint16_t *len)
> +#define declare_mailbox_handler(name) define_mailbox_handler(name)
> +
> +#define define_mailbox_handler_zeroed(name, size)                         \
> +    uint16_t __zero##name = size;                                         \
> +    static ret_code cmd_##name(struct cxl_cmd *cmd,                       \
> +                               CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate, uint16_t *len) \
> +    {                                                                     \
> +        *len = __zero##name;                                              \
> +        memset(cmd->payload, 0, *len);                                    \
> +        return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;                                          \
> +    }
> +#define define_mailbox_handler_const(name, data)                          \
> +    static ret_code cmd_##name(struct cxl_cmd *cmd,                       \
> +                               CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate, uint16_t *len) \
> +    {                                                                     \
> +        *len = sizeof(data);                                              \
> +        memcpy(cmd->payload, data, *len);                                 \
> +        return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;                                          \
> +    }
> +#define define_mailbox_handler_nop(name)                                  \
> +    static ret_code cmd_##name(struct cxl_cmd *cmd,                       \
> +                               CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate, uint16_t *len) \
> +    {                                                                     \
> +        return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;                                          \
> +    }
> +
> +#define CXL_CMD(s, c, in, cel_effect) \
> +    [s][c] = { stringify(s##_##c), cmd_##s##_##c, in, cel_effect }
> +
> +static struct cxl_cmd cxl_cmd_set[256][256] = {};
> +
> +#undef CXL_CMD
> +
> +QemuUUID cel_uuid;

static?

but really this seems more like something that should be in a property
of the device. Will it always be fixed or is it something the user might
want to tweak?

> +
> +void cxl_process_mailbox(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> +{
> +    uint16_t ret = CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
> +    struct cxl_cmd *cxl_cmd;
> +    uint64_t status_reg;
> +    opcode_handler h;
> +
> +    /*
> +     * current state of mailbox interface
> +     *  mbox_cap_reg = cxl_dstate->reg_state32[R_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CAP];
> +     *  mbox_ctrl_reg = cxl_dstate->reg_state32[R_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL];
> +     *  status_reg = *(uint64_t *)&cxl_dstate->reg_state[A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_STS];
> +     */
> +    uint64_t command_reg =
> +        *(uint64_t *)&cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state[A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD];
> +
> +    /* Check if we have to do anything */
> +    if (!ARRAY_FIELD_EX32(cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state32, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL,
> +                          DOORBELL)) {
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "Corrupt internal state for
> firmware\n");

is this actually UNIMP or has something gone wrong internally or is the
guest doing something wrong?

> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    uint8_t set = FIELD_EX64(command_reg, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, COMMAND_SET);
> +    uint8_t cmd = FIELD_EX64(command_reg, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, COMMAND);
> +    uint16_t len = FIELD_EX64(command_reg, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, LENGTH);
> +    cxl_cmd = &cxl_cmd_set[set][cmd];
> +    h = cxl_cmd->handler;
> +    if (!h) {
> +        qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "Command %04xh not implemented\n",
> +                                 set << 8 | cmd);
> +        goto handled;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (len != cxl_cmd->in) {
> +        ret = CXL_MBOX_INVALID_PAYLOAD_LENGTH;
> +    }
> +
> +    cxl_cmd->payload = cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state + A_CXL_DEV_CMD_PAYLOAD;
> +    ret = (*h)(cxl_cmd, cxl_dstate, &len);
> +    assert(len <= cxl_dstate->payload_size);
> +
> +handled:
> +    /*
> +     * Set the return code
> +     * XXX: it's a 64b register, but we're not setting the vendor, so we can get
> +     * away with this
> +     */
> +    status_reg = FIELD_DP64(0, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_STS, ERRNO, ret);
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Set the return length
> +     */
> +    command_reg = FIELD_DP64(command_reg, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, COMMAND_SET, 0);
> +    command_reg = FIELD_DP64(command_reg, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, COMMAND, 0);
> +    command_reg = FIELD_DP64(command_reg, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, LENGTH, len);
> +
> +    cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state64[A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD / 8] = command_reg;
> +    cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state64[A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_STS / 8] = status_reg;
> +
> +    /* Tell the host we're done */
> +    ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state32, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL,
> +                     DOORBELL, 0);
> +}
> +
> +int cxl_initialize_mailbox(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> +{
> +    const char *cel_uuidstr = "0da9c0b5-bf41-4b78-8f79-96b1623b3f17";

I'm curious as to where this magic number came from.

> +
> +    for (int set = 0; set < 256; set++) {
> +        for (int cmd = 0; cmd < 256; cmd++) {
> +            if (cxl_cmd_set[set][cmd].handler) {
> +                struct cxl_cmd *c = &cxl_cmd_set[set][cmd];
> +                struct cel_log *log =
> +                    &cxl_dstate->cel_log[cxl_dstate->cel_size];
> +
> +                log->opcode = (set << 8) | cmd;
> +                log->effect = c->effect;
> +                cxl_dstate->cel_size++;
> +            }
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    return qemu_uuid_parse(cel_uuidstr, &cel_uuid);
> +}
> diff --git a/hw/cxl/meson.build b/hw/cxl/meson.build
> index 47154d6850..0eca715d10 100644
> --- a/hw/cxl/meson.build
> +++ b/hw/cxl/meson.build
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>  softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_CXL', if_true: files(
>    'cxl-component-utils.c',
>    'cxl-device-utils.c',
> +  'cxl-mailbox-utils.c',
>  ))
> diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl.h
> index b9d1ac3fad..554ad93b6b 100644
> --- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -14,4 +14,7 @@
>  #include "cxl_component.h"
>  #include "cxl_device.h"
>  
> +#define CXL_COMPONENT_REG_BAR_IDX 0
> +#define CXL_DEVICE_REG_BAR_IDX 2
> +
>  #endif
> diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> index 4bdfa80eb4..b3aa248ee3 100644
> --- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> @@ -85,16 +85,28 @@ typedef struct cxl_device_state {
>      MemoryRegion device_registers;
>  
>      /* mmio for device capabilities array - 8.2.8.2 */
> +    MemoryRegion device;
>      struct {
>          MemoryRegion caps;
>          uint32_t caps_reg_state32[CXL_CAPS_SIZE / 4];
>      };
>  
> -    /* mmio for the device status registers 8.2.8.3 */
> -    MemoryRegion device;
> -

The above code motion should probably be squashed into the original patch 

>      /* mmio for the mailbox registers 8.2.8.4 */
> -    MemoryRegion mailbox;
> +    struct {
> +        MemoryRegion mailbox;
> +        uint16_t payload_size;
> +        union {
> +            uint8_t mbox_reg_state[CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH];
> +            uint16_t mbox_reg_state16[CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH / 2];
> +            uint32_t mbox_reg_state32[CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH / 4];
> +            uint64_t mbox_reg_state64[CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH / 8];
> +        };
> +        struct cel_log {
> +            uint16_t opcode;
> +            uint16_t effect;
> +        } cel_log[1 << 16];
> +        size_t cel_size;
> +    };
>  
>      /* memory region for persistent memory, HDM */
>      uint64_t pmem_size;
> @@ -137,6 +149,9 @@ CXL_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_HEADER_REGISTER(DEVICE, CXL_DEVICE_CAP_HDR1_OFFSET)
>  CXL_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_HEADER_REGISTER(MAILBOX, CXL_DEVICE_CAP_HDR1_OFFSET + \
>                                                 CXL_DEVICE_CAP_REG_SIZE)
>  
> +int cxl_initialize_mailbox(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate);
> +void cxl_process_mailbox(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate);
> +
>  #define cxl_device_cap_init(dstate, reg, cap_id)                           \
>      do {                                                                   \
>          uint32_t *cap_hdrs = dstate->caps_reg_state32;                     \
> @@ -165,6 +180,12 @@ REG32(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL, 4)
>      FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL, INT_EN, 1, 1)
>      FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL, BG_INT_EN, 2, 1)
>  
> +/* XXX: actually a 64b register */
> +REG32(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, 8)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, COMMAND, 0, 8)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, COMMAND_SET, 8, 8)
> +    FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, LENGTH, 16, 20)
> +
>  /* XXX: actually a 64b register */
>  REG32(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_STS, 0x10)
>      FIELD(CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_STS, BG_OP, 0, 1)


-- 
Alex Bennée


  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-26 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 182+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-24 17:16 [PATCH v4 00/42] CXl 2.0 emulation Support Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 01/42] hw/pci/cxl: Add a CXL component type (interface) Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-25 13:53   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-25 13:53     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 02/42] hw/cxl/component: Introduce CXL components (8.1.x, 8.2.5) Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-26 12:32   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-26 12:32     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-28 14:22     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-28 14:22       ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-28 14:46       ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-28 14:46         ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 03/42] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Compute Express Link Emulation Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-26 18:06   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-26 18:06     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 04/42] hw/cxl/device: Introduce a CXL device (8.2.8) Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-26 18:07   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-26 18:07     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-28 15:02     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-28 15:02       ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 05/42] hw/cxl/device: Implement the CAP array (8.2.8.1-2) Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-26 18:17   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-26 18:17     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-28 15:16     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-28 15:16       ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-28 16:37       ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-28 16:37         ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 06/42] hw/cxl/device: Implement basic mailbox (8.2.8.4) Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-26 18:22   ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2022-01-26 18:22     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-28 15:52     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-28 15:52       ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-27 11:31   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-27 11:31     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 07/42] hw/cxl/device: Add memory device utilities Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-27 11:28   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-27 11:28     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 08/42] hw/cxl/device: Add cheap EVENTS implementation (8.2.9.1) Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-27 11:43   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-27 11:43     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 09/42] hw/cxl/device: Timestamp implementation (8.2.9.3) Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-27 11:50   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-27 11:50     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-28 17:52     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-28 17:52       ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 10/42] hw/cxl/device: Add log commands (8.2.9.4) + CEL Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-27 11:55   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-27 11:55     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-28 16:47     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-28 16:47       ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 11/42] hw/pxb: Use a type for realizing expanders Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-27 12:01   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-27 12:01     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 12/42] hw/pci/cxl: Create a CXL bus type Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-27 12:05   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-27 12:05     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 13/42] hw/pxb: Allow creation of a CXL PXB (host bridge) Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-27 13:59   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-27 13:59     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-28 18:20     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-28 18:20       ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-28 18:48       ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-28 18:48         ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 14/42] tests/acpi: allow DSDT.viot table changes Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-27 14:06   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-27 14:06     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-28 18:26     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-28 18:26       ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-28 18:34       ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-28 18:34         ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 15/42] acpi/pci: Consolidate host bridge setup Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-27 14:10   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-27 14:10     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 16/42] tests/acpi: Add update DSDT.viot Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-27 14:12   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-27 14:12     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 17/42] cxl: Machine level control on whether CXL support is enabled Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-27 14:18   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-27 14:18     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 18/42] hw/cxl/component: Implement host bridge MMIO (8.2.5, table 142) Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 19/42] hw/cxl/rp: Add a root port Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 20/42] hw/cxl/device: Add a memory device (8.2.8.5) Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 21/42] hw/cxl/device: Implement MMIO HDM decoding (8.2.5.12) Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 22/42] acpi/cxl: Add _OSC implementation (9.14.2) Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 23/42] tests/acpi: allow CEDT table addition Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-02-09 18:18   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-09 18:18     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-02-09 19:09     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-02-09 19:09       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 24/42] acpi/cxl: Create the CEDT (9.14.1) Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 25/42] hw/cxl/device: Add some trivial commands Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 26/42] hw/cxl/device: Plumb real Label Storage Area (LSA) sizing Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 27/42] hw/cxl/device: Implement get/set Label Storage Area (LSA) Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-28 17:29   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-28 17:29     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 28/42] hw/cxl/component: Add utils for interleave parameter encoding/decoding Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 29/42] hw/cxl/host: Add support for CXL Fixed Memory Windows Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-25 17:02   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-25 17:02     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-25 17:51     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-25 17:51       ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-25 22:53       ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-25 22:53         ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 30/42] acpi/cxl: Introduce CFMWS structures in CEDT Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 31/42] hw/pci-host/gpex-acpi: Add support for dsdt construction for pxb-cxl Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-25 17:15   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-25 17:15     ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-25 18:13     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-25 18:13       ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-25 18:16       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-25 18:16         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-26 12:24       ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-26 12:24         ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 32/42] pci/pcie_port: Add pci_find_port_by_pn() Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 33/42] CXL/cxl_component: Add cxl_get_hb_cstate() Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 34/42] mem/cxl_type3: Add read and write functions for associated hostmem Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 35/42] cxl/cxl-host: Add memops for CFMWS region Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 36/42] arm/virt: Allow virt/CEDT creation Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:16   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v4 37/42] hw/arm/virt: Basic CXL enablement on pci_expander_bridge instances pxb-cxl Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:17   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v4 38/42] RFC: softmmu/memory: Add ops to memory_region_ram_init_from_file Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:17   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v4 39/42] hw/cxl/component Add a dumb HDM decoder handler Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:17   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v4 40/42] i386/pc: Enable CXL fixed memory windows Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:17   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v4 41/42] qtest/acpi: Add reference CEDT tables Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:17   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v4 42/42] qtest/cxl: Add very basic sanity tests Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 17:17   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-24 18:11 ` [PATCH v4 00/42] CXl 2.0 emulation Support Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-24 18:11   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-25 13:55 ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-25 13:55   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-25 15:49   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-25 15:49     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-25 19:18 ` Ben Widawsky
2022-01-25 19:18   ` Ben Widawsky
2022-01-25 23:55   ` Ben Widawsky
2022-01-25 23:55     ` Ben Widawsky
2022-01-26  9:46     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-26  9:46       ` Jonathan Cameron via
2022-01-27 14:22 ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-27 14:22   ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-27 16:42   ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-01-27 16:42     ` Jonathan Cameron via

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pmoebagl.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=cbrowy@avery-design.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=marcel@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=samarths@cadence.com \
    --cc=saransh@ibm.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=shreyas.shah@elastics.cloud \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.