From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mickael.salaun@ssi.gouv.fr>, "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Aleksa Sarai" <cyphar@cyphar.com>, "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>, "Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>, "Christian Heimes" <christian@python.org>, "Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>, "Eric Chiang" <ericchiang@google.com>, "James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>, "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>, "Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>, "Matthew Garrett" <mjg59@google.com>, "Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>, "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>, "Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>, "Philippe Trébuchet" <philippe.trebuchet@ssi.gouv.fr>, "Scott Shell" <scottsh@microsoft.com>, "Sean Christopherson" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>, "Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>, "Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>, "Steve Dower" <steve.dower@python.org>, "Steve Grubb" <sgrubb@redhat.com>, "Thibaut Sautereau" <thibaut.sautereau@ssi.gouv.fr>, "Vincent Strubel" <vincent.strubel@ssi.gouv.fr>, "Yves-Alexis Perez" <yves-alexis.perez@ssi.gouv.fr>, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] fs: Add support for an O_MAYEXEC flag on sys_open() Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 20:44:03 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <87r24tcljg.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <5a59b309f9d0603d8481a483e16b5d12ecb77540.camel@kernel.org> (Jeff Layton's message of "Fri, 06 Sep 2019 14:38:11 -0400") * Jeff Layton: > Even better would be to declare the new flag in some openat2-only flag > space, so there's no confusion about it being supported by legacy open > calls. Isn't that desirable anyway because otherwise fcntl with F_GETFL will give really confusing results? > If glibc wants to implement an open -> openat2 wrapper in userland > later, it can set that flag in the wrapper implicitly to emulate the old > behavior. I see us rather doing the opposite, i.e. implement openat2 with non-exotic flags using openat. But we've bitten by this in the past, so maybe that's not such a great idea. It's tempting to make the same mistake again for every new system call. Thanks, Florian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mickael.salaun@ssi.gouv.fr>, "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Aleksa Sarai" <cyphar@cyphar.com>, "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>, "Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>, "Christian Heimes" <christian@python.org>, "Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>, "Eric Chiang" <ericchiang@google.com>, "James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>, "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>, "Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>, "Matthew Garrett" <mjg59@google.com>, "Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>, "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>, "Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] fs: Add support for an O_MAYEXEC flag on sys_open() Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 20:44:03 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <87r24tcljg.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <5a59b309f9d0603d8481a483e16b5d12ecb77540.camel@kernel.org> (Jeff Layton's message of "Fri, 06 Sep 2019 14:38:11 -0400") * Jeff Layton: > Even better would be to declare the new flag in some openat2-only flag > space, so there's no confusion about it being supported by legacy open > calls. Isn't that desirable anyway because otherwise fcntl with F_GETFL will give really confusing results? > If glibc wants to implement an open -> openat2 wrapper in userland > later, it can set that flag in the wrapper implicitly to emulate the old > behavior. I see us rather doing the opposite, i.e. implement openat2 with non-exotic flags using openat. But we've bitten by this in the past, so maybe that's not such a great idea. It's tempting to make the same mistake again for every new system call. Thanks, Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-06 18:44 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-09-06 15:24 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add support for O_MAYEXEC Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 15:24 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] fs: Add support for an O_MAYEXEC flag on sys_open() Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 15:24 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 15:56 ` Florian Weimer 2019-09-06 15:56 ` Florian Weimer 2019-09-06 16:06 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 16:06 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 16:48 ` Jeff Layton 2019-09-06 16:48 ` Jeff Layton 2019-09-06 17:13 ` Aleksa Sarai 2019-09-06 17:13 ` Aleksa Sarai 2019-09-06 19:43 ` Jeff Layton 2019-09-06 19:43 ` Jeff Layton 2019-09-06 20:06 ` Andy Lutomirski 2019-09-06 20:06 ` Andy Lutomirski 2019-09-06 20:51 ` Jeff Layton 2019-09-06 20:51 ` Jeff Layton 2019-09-06 21:27 ` Andy Lutomirski 2019-09-06 21:27 ` Andy Lutomirski 2019-09-06 22:12 ` Aleksa Sarai 2019-09-06 22:12 ` Aleksa Sarai 2019-09-09 9:33 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-09 9:33 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 22:05 ` Aleksa Sarai 2019-09-06 22:05 ` Aleksa Sarai 2019-09-06 22:18 ` Aleksa Sarai 2019-09-06 22:18 ` Aleksa Sarai 2019-09-06 17:14 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 17:14 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 18:38 ` Jeff Layton 2019-09-06 18:38 ` Jeff Layton 2019-09-06 18:41 ` Andy Lutomirski 2019-09-06 18:41 ` Andy Lutomirski 2019-09-09 9:18 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-09 9:18 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-09 15:49 ` Andy Lutomirski 2019-09-09 15:49 ` Andy Lutomirski 2019-09-06 18:44 ` Florian Weimer [this message] 2019-09-06 18:44 ` Florian Weimer 2019-09-06 19:03 ` James Morris 2019-09-06 19:03 ` James Morris 2019-09-09 9:25 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-09 9:25 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-09 10:12 ` James Morris 2019-09-09 10:12 ` James Morris 2019-09-09 10:54 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-09 10:54 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-09 12:28 ` Aleksa Sarai 2019-09-09 12:28 ` Aleksa Sarai 2019-09-09 12:33 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-09 12:33 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-09 11:54 ` Aleksa Sarai 2019-09-09 11:54 ` Aleksa Sarai 2019-09-09 12:28 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-09 12:28 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 17:07 ` Aleksa Sarai 2019-09-06 17:07 ` Aleksa Sarai 2019-09-06 17:20 ` Christian Brauner 2019-09-06 17:20 ` Christian Brauner 2019-09-06 17:24 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 17:24 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 17:40 ` Tycho Andersen 2019-09-06 17:40 ` Tycho Andersen 2019-09-06 18:27 ` Florian Weimer 2019-09-06 18:27 ` Florian Weimer 2019-09-06 18:46 ` Tycho Andersen 2019-09-06 18:46 ` Tycho Andersen 2019-09-06 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] fs: Add a MAY_EXECMOUNT flag to infer the noexec mount propertie Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 15:24 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] fs: Enable to enforce noexec mounts or file exec through O_MAYEXEC Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 15:24 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] selftest/exec: Add tests for O_MAYEXEC enforcing Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 15:24 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] doc: Add documentation for the fs.open_mayexec_enforce sysctl Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 15:24 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-06 18:50 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Add support for O_MAYEXEC Steve Grubb 2019-09-06 18:50 ` Steve Grubb 2019-09-06 18:57 ` Florian Weimer 2019-09-06 18:57 ` Florian Weimer 2019-09-06 19:07 ` Steve Grubb 2019-09-06 19:07 ` Steve Grubb 2019-09-06 19:26 ` Andy Lutomirski 2019-09-06 19:26 ` Andy Lutomirski 2019-09-06 22:44 ` Aleksa Sarai 2019-09-06 22:44 ` Aleksa Sarai 2019-09-09 9:09 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-09 9:09 ` Mickaël Salaün 2019-09-09 0:16 ` James Morris 2019-09-09 0:16 ` James Morris
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=87r24tcljg.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com \ --to=fweimer@redhat.com \ --cc=ast@kernel.org \ --cc=christian@python.org \ --cc=corbet@lwn.net \ --cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \ --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \ --cc=ericchiang@google.com \ --cc=jack@suse.cz \ --cc=jannh@google.com \ --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \ --cc=jmorris@namei.org \ --cc=keescook@chromium.org \ --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \ --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=luto@kernel.org \ --cc=mic@digikod.net \ --cc=mickael.salaun@ssi.gouv.fr \ --cc=mjg59@google.com \ --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \ --cc=philippe.trebuchet@ssi.gouv.fr \ --cc=scottsh@microsoft.com \ --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \ --cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \ --cc=shuah@kernel.org \ --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \ --cc=steve.dower@python.org \ --cc=thibaut.sautereau@ssi.gouv.fr \ --cc=vincent.strubel@ssi.gouv.fr \ --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \ --cc=willy@infradead.org \ --cc=yves-alexis.perez@ssi.gouv.fr \ --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.