All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alistair@popple.id.au, agust@denx.de, keescook@chromium.org,
	bhsharma@redhat.com, dcashman@android.com, oss@buserror.net,
	paulus@samba.org, dcashman@google.com, bhupesh.linux@gmail.com,
	agraf@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: mm: support ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:06:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87shlcq0es.fsf@skywalker.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490730347-5165-1-git-send-email-bhsharma@redhat.com>

Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com> writes:

> powerpc arch_mmap_rnd() currently uses hard-coded values - (23-PAGE_SHIFT) for
> 32-bit and (30-PAGE_SHIFT) for 64-bit, to generate the random offset
> for the mmap base address for a ASLR ELF.
>
> This patch makes sure that powerpc mmap arch_mmap_rnd() implementation
> is similar to other ARCHs (like x86, arm64) and uses mmap_rnd_bits
> and helpers to generate the mmap address randomization.
>
> The maximum and minimum randomization range values represent
> a compromise between increased ASLR effectiveness and avoiding
> address-space fragmentation.
>
> Using the Kconfig option and suitable /proc tunable, platform
> developers may choose where to place this compromise.
>
> Also this patch keeps the default values as new minimums.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> * Changes since v2:
> v2 can be seen here (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9551509/)
>     - Changed a few minimum and maximum randomization ranges as per Michael's suggestion.
>     - Corrected Kees's email address in the Reviewed-by line.
>     - Added further comments in kconfig to explain how the address ranges were worked out.
>
> * Changes since v1:
> v1 can be seen here (https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2017-February/153594.html)
>     - No functional change in this patch.
>     - Dropped PATCH 2/2 from v1 as recommended by Kees Cook.
>
>  arch/powerpc/Kconfig   | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/powerpc/mm/mmap.c |  7 ++++---
>  2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index 97a8bc8..84aae67 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -22,6 +22,48 @@ config MMU
>  	bool
>  	default y
>  
> +# min bits determined by the following formula:
> +# VA_BITS - PAGE_SHIFT - CONSTANT
> +# where,
> +# 	VA_BITS = 46 bits for 64BIT and 4GB - 1 Page = 31 bits for 32BIT


Where did we derive that 46 bits from ? is that based on TASK_SIZE ?


> +# 	CONSTANT = 16 for 64BIT and 8 for 32BIT
> +config ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS_MIN
> +       default 5 if PPC_256K_PAGES && 32BIT  # 31 - 18 - 8 = 5
> +       default 7 if PPC_64K_PAGES && 32BIT   # 31 - 16 - 8 = 7
> +       default 9 if PPC_16K_PAGES && 32BIT   # 31 - 14 - 8 = 9
> +       default 11 if PPC_4K_PAGES && 32BIT   # 31 - 12 - 8 = 11
> +       default 12 if PPC_256K_PAGES && 64BIT # 46 - 18 - 16 = 12
> +       default 14 if PPC_64K_PAGES && 64BIT  # 46 - 16 - 16 = 14
> +       default 16 if PPC_16K_PAGES && 64BIT  # 46 - 14 - 16 = 16
> +       default 18 if PPC_4K_PAGES && 64BIT   # 46 - 12 - 16 = 18
> +
> +# max bits determined by the following formula:


-aneesh

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alistair@popple.id.au, agust@denx.de, keescook@chromium.org,
	dcashman@android.com, oss@buserror.net, paulus@samba.org,
	dcashman@google.com, bhupesh.linux@gmail.com, agraf@suse.com
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: mm: support ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:06:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87shlcq0es.fsf@skywalker.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490730347-5165-1-git-send-email-bhsharma@redhat.com>

Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com> writes:

> powerpc arch_mmap_rnd() currently uses hard-coded values - (23-PAGE_SHIFT) for
> 32-bit and (30-PAGE_SHIFT) for 64-bit, to generate the random offset
> for the mmap base address for a ASLR ELF.
>
> This patch makes sure that powerpc mmap arch_mmap_rnd() implementation
> is similar to other ARCHs (like x86, arm64) and uses mmap_rnd_bits
> and helpers to generate the mmap address randomization.
>
> The maximum and minimum randomization range values represent
> a compromise between increased ASLR effectiveness and avoiding
> address-space fragmentation.
>
> Using the Kconfig option and suitable /proc tunable, platform
> developers may choose where to place this compromise.
>
> Also this patch keeps the default values as new minimums.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> * Changes since v2:
> v2 can be seen here (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9551509/)
>     - Changed a few minimum and maximum randomization ranges as per Michael's suggestion.
>     - Corrected Kees's email address in the Reviewed-by line.
>     - Added further comments in kconfig to explain how the address ranges were worked out.
>
> * Changes since v1:
> v1 can be seen here (https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2017-February/153594.html)
>     - No functional change in this patch.
>     - Dropped PATCH 2/2 from v1 as recommended by Kees Cook.
>
>  arch/powerpc/Kconfig   | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/powerpc/mm/mmap.c |  7 ++++---
>  2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index 97a8bc8..84aae67 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -22,6 +22,48 @@ config MMU
>  	bool
>  	default y
>  
> +# min bits determined by the following formula:
> +# VA_BITS - PAGE_SHIFT - CONSTANT
> +# where,
> +# 	VA_BITS = 46 bits for 64BIT and 4GB - 1 Page = 31 bits for 32BIT


Where did we derive that 46 bits from ? is that based on TASK_SIZE ?


> +# 	CONSTANT = 16 for 64BIT and 8 for 32BIT
> +config ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS_MIN
> +       default 5 if PPC_256K_PAGES && 32BIT  # 31 - 18 - 8 = 5
> +       default 7 if PPC_64K_PAGES && 32BIT   # 31 - 16 - 8 = 7
> +       default 9 if PPC_16K_PAGES && 32BIT   # 31 - 14 - 8 = 9
> +       default 11 if PPC_4K_PAGES && 32BIT   # 31 - 12 - 8 = 11
> +       default 12 if PPC_256K_PAGES && 64BIT # 46 - 18 - 16 = 12
> +       default 14 if PPC_64K_PAGES && 64BIT  # 46 - 16 - 16 = 14
> +       default 16 if PPC_16K_PAGES && 64BIT  # 46 - 14 - 16 = 16
> +       default 18 if PPC_4K_PAGES && 64BIT   # 46 - 12 - 16 = 18
> +
> +# max bits determined by the following formula:


-aneesh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-13  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-28 19:45 [PATCH v3] powerpc: mm: support ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS Bhupesh Sharma
2017-03-28 19:45 ` [kernel-hardening] " Bhupesh Sharma
2017-04-10 17:20 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2017-04-10 17:20   ` [kernel-hardening] " Bhupesh Sharma
2017-04-13  6:36 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2017-04-13  6:36   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-04-13  6:52   ` Bhupesh Sharma
2017-04-13  6:52     ` [kernel-hardening] " Bhupesh Sharma
2017-04-13  6:58     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-04-13  6:58       ` [kernel-hardening] " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-04-13  7:09       ` Balbir Singh
2017-04-13  7:09         ` [kernel-hardening] " Balbir Singh
2017-04-13  7:09         ` Balbir Singh
2017-04-17  4:48         ` Bhupesh SHARMA
2017-04-17  4:48           ` [kernel-hardening] " Bhupesh SHARMA
2017-04-17  4:48           ` Bhupesh SHARMA
2017-04-13  7:46       ` Bhupesh Sharma
2017-04-13  7:46         ` [kernel-hardening] " Bhupesh Sharma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87shlcq0es.fsf@skywalker.in.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.com \
    --cc=agust@denx.de \
    --cc=alistair@popple.id.au \
    --cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhupesh.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=dcashman@android.com \
    --cc=dcashman@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=oss@buserror.net \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.