All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <dennis@kernel.org>,
	<tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>, <hughd@google.com>,
	<hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <mhocko@suse.com>, <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	<alexs@kernel.org>, <david@redhat.com>, <minchan@kernel.org>,
	<richard.weiyang@gmail.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/swap: remove confusing checking for non_swap_entry() in swap_ra_info()
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:53:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v98jkpjt.fsf@yhuang6-desk1.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210417094039.51711-5-linmiaohe@huawei.com> (Miaohe Lin's message of "Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:40:38 -0400")

Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> writes:

> While we released the pte lock, somebody else might faulted in this pte.
> So we should check whether it's swap pte first to guard against such race
> or swp_type would be unexpected. But the swap_entry isn't used in this
> function and we will have enough checking when we really operate the PTE
> entries later. So checking for non_swap_entry() is not really needed here
> and should be removed to avoid confusion.

Please rephrase the change log to describe why we have the code and why
it's unnecessary now.  You can dig the git history via git-blame to find
out it.

The patch itself looks good to me.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
> ---
>  mm/swap_state.c | 6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
> index 272ea2108c9d..df5405384520 100644
> --- a/mm/swap_state.c
> +++ b/mm/swap_state.c
> @@ -721,7 +721,6 @@ static void swap_ra_info(struct vm_fault *vmf,
>  {
>  	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
>  	unsigned long ra_val;
> -	swp_entry_t entry;
>  	unsigned long faddr, pfn, fpfn;
>  	unsigned long start, end;
>  	pte_t *pte, *orig_pte;
> @@ -739,11 +738,6 @@ static void swap_ra_info(struct vm_fault *vmf,
>  
>  	faddr = vmf->address;
>  	orig_pte = pte = pte_offset_map(vmf->pmd, faddr);
> -	entry = pte_to_swp_entry(*pte);
> -	if ((unlikely(non_swap_entry(entry)))) {
> -		pte_unmap(orig_pte);
> -		return;
> -	}
>  
>  	fpfn = PFN_DOWN(faddr);
>  	ra_val = GET_SWAP_RA_VAL(vma);

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-19  1:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-17  9:40 [PATCH v2 0/5] close various race windows for swap Miaohe Lin
2021-04-17  9:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/swapfile: add percpu_ref support " Miaohe Lin
2021-04-19  2:48   ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-19  2:48     ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-19  6:46     ` Miaohe Lin
2021-04-19  7:09       ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-19  7:09         ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-19  7:35         ` Miaohe Lin
2021-04-19  7:52           ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-19  7:52             ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-19  8:20             ` Miaohe Lin
2021-04-17  9:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/swapfile: use percpu_ref to serialize against concurrent swapoff Miaohe Lin
2021-04-19  2:54   ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-19  2:54     ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-19  6:57     ` Miaohe Lin
2021-04-17  9:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] swap: fix do_swap_page() race with swapoff Miaohe Lin
2021-04-19  2:23   ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-19  2:23     ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-19  6:54     ` Miaohe Lin
2021-04-17  9:40 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/swap: remove confusing checking for non_swap_entry() in swap_ra_info() Miaohe Lin
2021-04-19  1:53   ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2021-04-19  1:53     ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-19  6:46     ` Miaohe Lin
2021-04-17  9:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/shmem: fix shmem_swapin() race with swapoff Miaohe Lin
2021-04-19  2:15   ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-19  2:15     ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-19  6:49     ` Miaohe Lin
2021-04-19  7:04       ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-19  7:04         ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-19  7:14         ` Miaohe Lin
2021-04-19  7:41           ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-19  7:41             ` Huang, Ying
2021-04-19  8:18             ` Miaohe Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v98jkpjt.fsf@yhuang6-desk1.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexs@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.